JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 445)

RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

What gave you the idea that they [the two "Marguerite Oswalds" that appear in John Armstrong's 2003 book "Harvey And Lee"] were intended to impersonate each other?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Okay. Whatever.

There's nothing like needless complications surrounding the MOTHER of the "patsy" to make your Patsy Plot go off smooth as clockwork. Right, Rich?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

They used the same name but lived separate lives in separate locations. Nowhere did Armstrong indicate they tried to pass as each other.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Using the "same name" certainly sounds like a form of "impersonation" to me.

Or was it a mere coincidence that the "fake" Marguerite decided to use the name of the real Marguerite?

Just make up an answer. After all, I'm sure that's what Armstrong does in his case-solving gem "Harvey And Lee". Right, Rich?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

If you read the book and looked at the evidence[,] you'd know that.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I'm fairly certain that my weak bladder wouldn't last beyond the table of contents.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

I don't know if you'd know bullshit if you stepped in it.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Sure I would. After all, I'm talking to you about this silly nonsense that never happened regarding LHO and his mother, aren't I? And nothing stinks worse than this BS we're talking about in this thread.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

I made no statement regarding whether or not H&L sold well. It had a limited printing.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Well, since I wasn't talking to you when I said what I said (I was replying to Rudy Lasparri's post there [CLICK HERE]), your comment here doesn't mean much.

But, just for the record, I did misunderstand and misinterpret Rudy's response on that point regarding his wife and the distribution of the book from 2003 to 2007.

I guess he meant he could check the sales records for "Harvey And Lee" (aka: Tripe Between Book Covers) and find out if I personally had bought a copy between '03 and '07.

Obviously, he's not going to find my name in his records. But since he also apparently has me mixed up with David A. Reitzes, perhaps he wouldn't even be looking for DVP when conducting such a search. ~shrug~


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

It's all there, but I'm not surprised that Bug [Vincent T. Bugliosi, Esq.] couldn't find it.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Funny, though, that not a single soul who worked for the Warren Commission or the HSCA or the Rockefeller Commission, or anybody else on the planet, could come up with this definitive "evidence" that there were double Lee Harvey Oswalds AND double Marguerite Oswalds wandering around prior to JFK's assassination.

I guess you're probably not surprised, though, that the big, bad Government couldn't find any hint of this "evidence" either. Right, Rich?

After all, the WC and HSCA (15 years apart) probably couldn't find a streetcar if they had a transfer in their hands and the steetcar was pointed out to them. (Per Jim Garrison's funny comment to Johnny Carson on January 31, 1968.)
Right, Rich?

It took John Armstrong to come to the rescue and reveal the real truth about the assassination and its participants. Right?

Gotcha.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

I guess the SBT [Single-Bullet Theory] uses common sense.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Yep. Sure does. Every step of the way. Like HERE.

But I guess an anti-SBTer's "THREE BULLETS DID THE SAME JOB AS JUST CE399 AND NOBODY IN GOVERNMENT REALLY NOTICED (OR CARED)" theory is supposedly much higher up on the "Common Sense" scale than is the Single-Bullet Conclusion.

Right, Rich?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

Armstrong never said they [the two "Oswalds"] both worked at the TSBD. Nor did he say they were identical in appearance. One was 5'7" and the other 5'10". One was 135 lbs, the other was 165. One had blue eyes, the other hazel.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:



Another great job by the Patsy Plotters there! They're going to try to pass off one of those "Oswalds" as the other one, despite the differences in appearance you just mentioned.

Or wasn't the "second" Oswald supposed to be "impersonating" the first Oswald at all? If not, then what the hell was he doing in the Depository along with the "other" Oswald on November 22nd? (Or did Vince B. supposedly get that wrong too?)

Great plot you're placing your faith in there, Rich. You might be only a couple of baby steps away from endorsing Brian David Andersen at this rate.

From having talked with you a year or two ago during my short stay as a participant on your forum at JFKResearch.com [now defunct], I had the impression that you were a reasonable CTer (vs. being really "out there" in cuckoo land). I can see now I should re-evaluate that original assessment.

And your last Black Op Radio appearance didn't help either. I couldn't believe some of the shit you uttered on that program. Will next Thursday's Black Op appearance be any better in the "reasonable" department?


REPLAY:

One was 5'7" and the other 5'10". One was 135 lbs, the other was 165.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

So, then, I guess the Lee H. Oswald who was picked up by the Dallas Police in the Texas Theater is yet a THIRD "Oswald", huh Rich?

Because the "Texas Theater" Oswald was 5'9" tall and weighed 150 pounds. And yet you've described NEITHER of your two "Oswalds" as having those physical stats.

Care to go for a fourth?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

RH ["Reclaiming History"] is on the top of the crap pile -- I know, because
I read it.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Well, then, tell me -- how did you like this excellent part of that book?:

"The conspiracy community regularly seizes on one slip of the tongue, misunderstanding, or slight discrepancy to defeat twenty pieces of solid evidence; accepts one witness of theirs, even if he or she is a provable nut, as being far more credible than ten normal witnesses on the other side; treats rumors, even questions, as the equivalent of proof; leaps from the most minuscule of discoveries to the grandest of conclusions; and insists that the failure to explain everything perfectly negates all that is explained." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Page xliii of "Reclaiming History" (c.2007)


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

If you knew what you're talking about, you'd know that they were aware that the FBI located and seized school records of both men.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Let's see those records. Does Armstrong have copies of them, by chance?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

If there was only one [Lee Harvey Oswald], how did he attend 2 schools, one in Fort Worth and one in New Orleans, at the same time?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Beats me. This is Armstrong's batch of nonsense. Let him figure it out. (And he has figured it out to his "Double Oswald" satisfaction, right? Right.)


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

Everyone who disagrees with you is retarded.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Not necessarily. But everybody who puts a lot of faith and stock in a stupid, never-could-have-happened-in-a-million-years fairy tale of a theory like John Armstrong's theory could be looked upon as being kind of "retarded", yes.

But sometimes CTers are just "wrong" -- not really "retarded". Of course, when we're talking about the conspiracy-loving kooks at the acj forum, then being retarded is a prerequisite for posting there, yes.

David Von Pein
February 21, 2009

JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 510)

RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

Folks,

Today [April 10, 2009] I received this bizarre email purportedly from Judyth Vary Baker. I had not had any communication with her in over 6 years. I am as bewildered by this as anyone could be.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Dave Reitzes,

Did you get specific permission from Rich DellaRosa to cross-post that JFKResearch.com message on this forum?


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

No, he did not. He should not have had access to the post at all since he is not a member.


DAVE REITZES SAID:

I let my [JFKResearch.com] membership lapse some years back when they started demanding a donation.

Someone was clearly willing to risk their membership in order to forward me this breaking news about Judyth.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I'm just curious, because cross-posting is the reason I was booted off Rich's forum:

"IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THIS FORUM, NO PORTION OF THE ABOVE POST IS TO BE CROSS-POSTED ON ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP OR FORUM."

Oddly, Rich won't even allow non-members to read any posts at his forum, which is something I've never understood at all. A most curious restriction.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

My forum is not intended for people who need to hide behind aliases or those who cannot abide by the rules. My members are entitled to know who their audience is when they post and feel confident that they know who can and cannot read their submissions.


JOHN McADAMS SAID:

Why?

If somebody is telling the truth, should they not be willing to shout it to the whole wide world?

Are your posters only willing to address posts to just a certain small group of people?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

As I said before, it's a very odd stance to take when it comes to "Internet Forums" (IMO).

I would think that if people are proud of what they post and they think it's worthy of being posted on a JFK forum (and why would anyone post stuff that they DON'T feel is worthy of posting?)....then why on Earth would any such person object to his or her messages being seen by the Internet world at-large?

~shrug of bewilderment~

I truly wish Mr. DellaRosa would remove his "Only Members Can Read Posts" restriction at JFKResearch.com, because I'd enjoy reading some of the stuff that is posted at that forum.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

Not having certain provocateurs turn submissions into strawmen and fanning the flames of dissent causes many members to post freely and confidently. There's no one there to call them "kooks" or "retards."

Further, there's no need for moderators to review submissions prior to allowing them to be posted. All that is required is that members conduct themselves with civility.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

What has that got to do with allowing people to simply READ your forum's content?

I'd very much like to read the posts at JFKResearch.com, but Rich just won't permit it.

You might as well just make it a forum accessible only by private e-mails. Your current set-up is practically the same as that.


RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

That is how we evolved. In the late 90s, we had various email groups, but at the time not everyone was capable of attaching or viewing photos. So we moved to a web based forum.

The folks who abide by the simple rules of civility can read and post to their heart's delight. And it is not necessary to agree with me or any other member. There is considerable debate, but the debaters don't use the "sharp stick in the eye" technique to get their points across.


JUDYTH VARY BAKER SAID:

I have given up everything for the sake of one person--Lee Oswald--and I seek his exoneration and vindication.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

The above quote is a truly sad one indeed.

Judyth Vary Baker has some serious problems it would seem. I often wonder if Judyth has ever even studied ANY of the many, many pieces of hard evidence that easily would have convicted her "lover" (Lee Harvey Oswald) in a court of law, had he lived to stand trial, such as the stuff discussed at my blog below?



My guess is that Judyth probably has not seriously studied and evaluated the hard evidence that exists against Lee Oswald in the TWO murders that he was charged with in 1963.

Nor has Judyth focused very heavily on another very important aspect of the JFK murder case -- the ACTIONS and the PROVABLE LIES of her "lover", both before and after the assassination of President Kennedy.

Judyth even admits (as recently as her April 10, 2009, e-mail to Rich DellaRosa) that "I am not a 'researcher' about the JFK assassination".

In short, Judyth Vary Baker either has been inflicted with a terminal case of "denial" regarding the obvious guilt of Lee Oswald, or (perhaps) she can be defined as author Vincent Bugliosi defines her in VB's 2007 JFK book "Reclaiming History" -- "a sick puppy".


PAMELA BROWN SAID:

Interesting that you are comfortable pushing the fairy tale of the WCR, not to mention Bug's [Vincent Bugliosi's] fiasco, and yet complain at Judyth speaking out on behalf of Lee's innocence.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Yeah, imagine the gall of me complaining about a proven liar (Judyth Baker) telling lies. Who'd ever thunk it?!

Two words that can never be placed together are these words:

1.) Lee's.

2.) Innocence.


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

That's the easy way to avoid discussing tough issues. Just call everyone a liar.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I've called very few people outright liars. Very, very few, in fact.

By my rough count, I think I've only called three people who are connected in some way with the JFK case "liars" in any of my forum posts over the years:

1.) Roger Craig
2.) Jean Hill
3.) Judyth Vary Baker

It's possible (and probable) that a few more people could/should be added to the above list as proven liars, but I think I've used the word "liar" only when speaking of the three individuals named above. (Not counting members of JFK newsgroups and forums, of course.)


PAMELA BROWN SAID:

You seem to be comfortable calling people names who don't agree with you. You claim Judyth is a liar for believing in Lee's innocence? Guess that's an easy way to debate when you don't have any evidence.

[...]

"DVP" seems to think his credentials allow him to designate people as liars.

But just what does he say his credentials are?


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

Did Judyth ever say Lee was innocent?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Good gosh, Tony....READ!!

What do you think these words from Judyth's own mouth mean?:

"I have given up everything for the sake of one person--Lee Oswald--and I seek his exoneration and vindication." -- Judyth Vary Baker; April 10, 2009

Tony,

Do you think that Judyth is seeking to "exonerate" and "vindicate" a person whom she believes to be GUILTY of killing President Kennedy and Officer Tippit? That would be a rather strange (not to mention evil) thing to do, wouldn't it (even if she DID have a love affair with Lee Harvey)?

David Von Pein
May 4, 2009
May 5, 2009

JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 174)

RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

>>> "You called this forum [the now-defunct "JFK Research" forum] "a ghost town." If it is, why are you here??" <<<


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Even a ghost town has a passing tumbleweed roll by every now and then.


>>> "You do not have all the bullets. Not even close." <<<

The LN side has all the bullets and fragments that aren't in the "Make-Believe Conspiracy" drawer, that's for sure. Conspiracy theorists like to pretend that additional bullets exist in the case. Unfortunately, a "pretend" bullet doesn't hold much weight with a jury. (Or at least...it shouldn't hold very much weight.)


>>> "There are fragments still in Connally's corpse than are missing from CE 399." <<<

I'm assuming you meant to put the word "more" in your last sentence
(between "are" and "fragments").

Of course, if that's what you meant to say, you couldn't be more
incorrect, because the total amount of bullet fragments that were
buried with Mr. Connally in 1993 wouldn't amount to half-a-grain, and
everybody knows it. Just check Dr. Gregory's detailed WC testimony.

Two related articles HERE and HERE.


>>> "Todd Vaughn [sic] and Jean Davison are long time members [of the "JFK RESEARCH ASSASSINATION FORUM"]." <<<

Oh, really? I didn't realize that. That's two (strong) points in your
Forum Favor, indeed. But have they ever written a post here? Or are
they merely visitors who never post (like I was for five months before
making my first actual post a few days ago)?

Anyway, no matter. I love Jean, though.


>>> "Do you suppose that your reputation didn't precede you here?? But you were allowed in anyway. Now, the ball is in your court." <<<

I'll try not to dribble on your feet, Rich.


>>> "The members of the WC, each of them before they passed, admitted that they didn't believe their own report. So, why do you??" <<<

There's a very good reason for such an "OSWALD SHOT KENNEDY" belief in
the post-WC era. And that very good reason is --- the HSCA.

The HSCA fully agreed with the WC with respect to the number of
bullets that hit any victims in Limo SS-100-X and the HSCA fully
agreed with the WC with respect to the name of the one and only gunman
who fired any bullets that hit any victims on 11/22 -- Lee H. Oswald.

Imagine the coincidence of the WC and the HSCA both getting those
last two facts dead wrong.

But you (and many, many other CTers like you) think the Warren Commission
and the HSCA both got it wrong, don't you?

Amazing Governmental incompetence, huh?


>>> "The [Mannlicher-Carcano bullets] purchased by the Marine Corps on behalf of the CIA??" <<<

Huh?

Plus: "WTF"?

Plus: WTF does the above have to do with Oswald shooting Kennedy on
Elm Street in Dallas in November of 1963? Anything at all? (Didn't think so.)


>>> "There is one data point for Oswald taking a package to work: Buell Wesley Frazier/Linnie Mae Randle." <<<

That's two total "points", isn't it?

Anyway, to believe that anything OTHER than Rifle #C2766 [CE139] was
inside that paper bag that Oswald carried with him on the morning of
November 22nd is to believe in a fairy tale that would rival Aesop's
best effort. More here.

And we know that Oswald didn't take any "lunch" bag to work on 11/22
either. How can we know that for sure? Because Oswald TOLD US so:

"He [LHO] didn't take his lunch because I remember right when I got in the car I asked him where was his lunch and he said he was going to buy his lunch that day." -- Buell Wesley Frazier


>>> "And why would Oswald buy a gun by mail order?" <<<

Shame on Mr. Oswald for not meeting a CTer's expectations of how he
should have obtained the weapon that he used to shoot some people in
Nov. '63.

He should have called you first, Rich, before he mailed in that Klein's
coupon. You could have set him straight.


>>> "As for Bugliosi, I paid 20 cents for his book. I overpaid." <<<

You want me to get you a refund?


>>> "You can tell him [Vince Bugliosi] he can come here and address the issues -- but he wouldn't last a nanosecond, because we don't allow personal attacks." <<<

You want to spoil everybody's fun, don't you Rich? ~sniff~




>>> "One of our best supporters, Jim Fetzer, has issued his smoking guns -- you can start there." <<<

~~LOL Break~~ Already done that (here).

And after looking over Mr. Fetzer's pathetic (and desperate) list of
"Smokers", I get the distinct feeling that something stronger than
just gunsmoke was being inhaled by Jim "The Zapruder Film Has Been
Wholly Fabricated" Fetzer when he authored his inane list of 16 items.


>>> "Let's see the old LN rant: LHO did it because he wanted the fame -- but, from the first moment he went in front of national TV cameras, he proclaimed he didn't do it!" <<<

And you think that Oswald DIDN'T get any fame by saying he didn't kill
anybody?

Think again. His denials got him all the fame he desired....just as if
he had said "I did it". He knew he left a popcorn trail a mile long
leading back to him. He obviously knew that. He HAD to have known
that.

In fact, I've postulated recently that it's quite possible that Oswald
deliberately left such a trail for the cops (multiplied by two murders
too, including the trail of four bullet shells on 10th St. that obviously
lead straight back into the gun that Oswald failed to ditch after murdering
a policeman with it).

So he knew that that popcorn trail would convict him, regardless of what
he himself said. As to WHY he would intentionally leave such a lengthy
trail of "Oswald Was Here" evidence for the authorities to find afterward,
while ALSO denying all guilt....I cannot say.

Maybe I'll try to dig up Oswald and ask him to explain his oddball
behavior that he exhibited on November 22, 1963. (Think he'll be nice
enough to tell me the truth?)

In any event, in the final analysis of Oswald's actions and behavior
in wake of the events in Dallas that day, double-murderer Lee Harvey
Oswald most certainly achieved any "fame" he may have been seeking by
merely remaining silent and lying his worthless ass off.

Oswald also seemed to enjoy keeping secrets. And I think he also loved
the little game he was playing with the cops and the FBI after he was
arrested.

To quote Oswald himself: "Well, you're the cops--YOU figure it out!"




>>> "LHO shot JFK with surgical precision as he was a moving target traveling away from him..." <<<

And yet LHO missed the actual target (JFK's head) two times out of three
shots. So, your "surgical precision" really equates to only a .333 average.
That average, of course, is very good in baseball, but it's not really so hot
when we're talking about Presidential assassinations.


>>> "...But when he [Oswald] supposedly shot at General Walker sitting
in his stationary dining room with all the time he wished to aim, he missed!" <<<

The bullet hit something before it reached General Walker's body, of
course. The window sill. You know that, of course. And you also no
doubt know that the window-sill ledge (latticework) that the bullet
struck before entering Walker's home was said to be virtually invisible
from the gunman's (Oswald's) POV, due to the lighting in the room
where Walker was sitting.

But there was no window sill between the barrel of Oswald's Mannlicher-
Carcano and JFK's body on 11/22/63. There was an oak tree that
partially blocked LHO's view for a few seconds, yes.

And that tree, IMO, is the reason that the first shot (at about Z-Film
frame 160) ended up totally missing JFK and the limousine.

BTW, I love the insertion of the word "supposedly" in Rich DellaRosa's
last comment above. I guess you (Rich) think Marina was just one of
the many liars and cover-uppers who got together to paint Saint Ozzie
as the "patsy" who fired a shot at Walker in April '63, huh?

How long is your list of "plotters" and "cover-uppers", btw? (Can you
keep it under 1,000? I doubt it.)

David Von Pein
March 2008

LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (MARCH 17, 2008)

DAVID VON PEIN VS. VARIOUS CONSPIRACY THEORISTS

DVP vs. DAVID LIFTON

DVP vs. JAMES DiEUGENIO

DVP vs. VINCE PALAMARA

DVP vs. DOUG HORNE

DVP vs. JAMES FETZER

DVP vs. JUDYTH VARY BAKER

DVP vs. PAT SPEER

DVP vs. ROBERT HARRIS

DVP vs. ANTHONY MARSH

DVP vs. GREG PARKER

DVP vs. GARY AGUILAR

DVP vs. JAMES R. GORDON

DVP vs. WILLIAM KELLY

DVP vs. JOSEPH McBRIDE

DVP vs. GIL JESUS

DVP vs. BARB JUNKKARINEN

DVP vs. LEE FARLEY

DVP vs. PAMELA BROWN

DVP vs. ORLANDO MARTIN

DVP vs. DON JEFFRIES

DVP vs. RAY MITCHAM

DVP vs. CLIFF VARNELL

DVP vs. COLIN CROW

DVP vs. WILLY WHITTEN

DVP vs. JIM HARGROVE

DVP vs. MARTIN HAY

DVP vs. BEN HOLMES

DVP vs. DAVID JOSEPHS

DVP vs. RAMON F. HERRERA

DVP vs. BART KAMP

DVP vs. HERBERT BLENNER

DVP vs. RON ECKER

DVP vs. GARRY PUFFER

DVP vs. SANDY LARSEN

DVP vs. THOMAS H. PURVIS

DVP vs. JON G. TIDD

DVP vs. DONALD WILLIS

DVP vs. STEVE THOMAS

DVP vs. GLENN NALL

DVP vs. TOM SCULLY

DVP vs. RICH DELLAROSA

DVP vs. SEAN MURPHY

DVP vs. MARTIN WEIDMANN

DVP vs. WALT CAKEBREAD

DVP vs. TOM ROSSLEY

DVP vs. CORY SANTOS

DVP vs. ALAN FORD

DVP vs. BOB PRUDHOMME

DVP vs. TONY FRATINI

DVP vs. DENNY ZARTMAN

DVP vs. JOHN IACOLETTI

DVP vs. KENNETH DREW

DVP vs. PAUL JOLLIFFE

DVP vs. RICH POPE

DVP vs. RON BULMAN

DVP vs. GREG DOUDNA

DVP vs. ROBERT CAPRIO

DVP vs. DAVID HEALY

DVP vs. MICHAEL CLARK

DVP vs. JOHN BARBOUR

DVP vs. RALPH CINQUE

DVP vs. EDUCATION FORUM


===============================


ALSO SEE:

JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 101)

ROB CAPRIO SAID:

>>> "I know which call he [Rich DellaRosa] is talking about." <<<


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

So do I. And he quoted Russell and LBJ incorrectly...and definitely
out of context.


>>> "Russell said he didn't believe it and Johnson said he didn't
either." <<<

Right. They're talking about the Single-Bullet Theory there. They are
certainly NOT discussing whether Lee Harvey Oswald was or was not
the sole assassin.


>>> "You claimed Rich was wrong and this was not to the overall conclusion of the WC, but rather the SBT only. Without the SBT you have NO WC conclusion." <<<

At that point in time (Sep. '64), before the WCR even came out, LBJ
certainly hadn't looked deeply into the case, and he could most
certainly have been of the opinion that even without the SBT Oswald
could have been the lone assassin. If you listen to the whole 9/18/64
call [below], it's obvious that BOTH men feel this way at that point in time.





I'll replay this hunk of Rob idiocy --- "Without the SBT you have
NO WC conclusion" --- which is total bullshit. The WC was NOT
boxing itself in to accepting the SBT at all costs (due to James Tague's
injury).

How do we know they weren't boxed in? Because of Page #117, where it
states in B&W that the WC was readily acknowledging the possibility
that Tague's injury could have very well been caused by a fragment
from the HEAD SHOT.

Therefore, via that "Tague Possibly Wounded By Head-Shot Fragment"
scenario, the SBT is not a MANDATORY conclusion to reach to still
arrive at the "LHO Alone" final conclusion.

Better read page 117 a few times, Rob. It'll do you good (maybe).


>>> "You messed up." <<<

No I didn't. But if you want to think I did, it'll be perfectly
consistent with your current .000 CT Batting Average; i.e., you never
get anything right, no matter what the subject matter is.


>>> "I want your boss' name to complain..." <<<

I'd like to hear from your bosses too, Rob. But Moe and Curly have
both passed away. So, it appears I'm out of luck there.


>>> "They are one in the same, Dave. The fact that you can't get that is scary." <<<

Then you'd better go back and read page #117 of the WCR again, Rob.
Obviously, the significance of that page has failed to sink in.

Footnote......

To repeat -- I, myself, DO think that the SBT is mandatory in order
for Lee Oswald to be the lone assassin of JFK. But the Warren
Commission's collective opinion was NOT as strict and restrictive as
my own on the SBT matter....and Page 117 of the WR proves that fact.

David Von Pein
December 2007

LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (DECEMBER 26, 2007)

JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 175)

RICH DELLAROSA SAID:

>>> "I will not address the above point-by-point, because if you
really believe what you wrote your cognitive faculties are most likely impaired." <<<


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Yeah, why believe the ACTUAL EVIDENCE ON THE TABLE, when I could crawl
into bed with the likes of Mr. Fetzer and Mr. Lifton and believe stupid shit?

Right, Rich?


>>> "None of the WC actually believed those things and stated so." <<<

You're WAY overstating things here. There's no way that ALL SEVEN of
the Warren Commissioners went on record as having totally disbelieved
their own final "LN/LHO" conclusions.

Anyone believing that was the case probably possesses "cognitive
faculties" that "are most likely impaired".


>>> "As for the Bug [Vincent T. Bugliosi], if his research could stand on its own merit, he would not need to resort to ad hominem attacks." <<<

But the "ad homs" are so much fun (and deserved). I love 'em. :)


>>> "They do not enhance his position IMO." <<<

They definitely enhance his position. Why in the world shouldn't a
"zany" be called a "zany"?

It's odd that people who side with the likes of Fetzer and Lifton and
Armstrong and Waldron actually seem to think that their crazy notions
are worthy of NOT being ridiculed.

Curious indeed.


>>> "Fortunately [Bugliosi's] book will not likely make back what it cost to produce it." <<<

And I think even Bugs knows this is probably true.


>>> "And his million dollar promotion tour is out of gas." <<<

~chuckle~

Well, sure it is. His book tour and radio tour was pretty much over in
June/July 2007. (Except for a few later appearances.)

But, thanks to me, you can re-live almost all of Vince's radio appearances
regarding "Reclaiming History", including the SBT debate he had with Wecht
on June 14th, 2007. And I won't even charge you anything to access my
online files either (although donations via VISA or personal check are
welcome; after all, I can't be expected to work as a CIA/VB Disinfo Agent
for free, 24/7, can I?): ;)







>>> "The last Roper poll showed that nearly 90% of the American public believe there was a conspiracy to kill JFK." <<<

A virtually meaningless stat, seeing as how probably 90% of that 90%
more-than-likely don't even know who J.D. Tippit is.

But keep plugging those polls. It can't HURT your make-believe case
for conspiracy anyway.

David Von Pein
March 2008

LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (MARCH 17, 2008)

JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 481)

TOM ROSSLEY SAID:

I was surprised to hear [John] McAdams admit that he doesn't have the 26 volumes though!!


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Why would John (or anyone) need the PHYSICAL VOLUMES themselves, Tom? I don't own a set of the physical volumes either.

The 27 WC volumes (including the 888-page Warren Report itself) are available for free all over the Internet...and (for a very small price) are also available on CD-ROM. (I got my CD copy last year from Rich DellaRosa's website; a good deal too.)

So possessing the physical volumes themselves is totally unnecessary, and you (Tom) must surely know it's unnecessary in today's "Internet" age.

And that's something that I was trying to get Vincent Bugliosi to fully understand when Vince was doing his many radio interviews when promoting his JFK book in 2007.

Through his secretary, I think I wrote a couple of e-mails to her on this very subject, attempting to get word to Vince to stop embarrassing himself (slightly) when he continued to seemingly insist that the ONLY possible way to read all of the information in the 26 Warren Commission volumes is by possessing the physical volumes themselves....which is just a ridiculous claim in this computer age we live in.

Unfortunately, I was never able to get Vince to stop making that incorrect claim about the WC volumes. Just as I was also unsuccessful in getting Vince to stop making the VERY wrong statement that he made in 2007 when he claimed that "Reclaiming History" was the "only book" ever published to include pictures of Zapruder frames 312 and 313. I, alone, have five JFK books that have those frames printed in them.

But that just goes to show that even a master of a subject can make an occasional innocuous error every now and then.

Perhaps Mr. Bugliosi should debate Thomas Rossley sometime. That would be a howl....with Rossley calling VB a liar for two or three straight hours....and with Vince countering with gobs of evidence favoring the guilt of the man whom Rossley thinks was completely innocent of killing anybody on November 22, 1963.

About the only points Rossley could score with Vince would be to inform him of the couple of minor verbal gaffes that Vince made on radio and TV in 2007 (the ones I discussed above). Other than that [and a few other small errors that do crop up in "Reclaiming History"], ol' Tom would be toasted by the physical evidence of the guilt of Lee Harvey Oswald--for two or three straight hours (or until it got too embarrassing for ol' Tom R. to continue the debate).

David Von Pein
April 6, 2009

JUDYTH VARY BAKER

"I have given up everything for the sake of one person--Lee Oswald--and I seek his exoneration and vindication." -- Judyth Vary Baker; April 10, 2009


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

The above quote is a truly sad one indeed.

Judyth Vary Baker, who has made the claim that she was Lee Harvey Oswald's lover in the months leading up to President Kennedy's assassination in 1963, has some serious problems it would seem.

I often wonder if Judyth has ever even studied ANY of the many, many pieces
of hard evidence that easily would have convicted her "lover", Lee Oswald, in
a court of law, had he lived to stand trial, such as the stuff discussed in the articles HERE and HERE.

My guess is that Judyth probably has not seriously studied and evaluated the hard evidence that exists against Lee Oswald in the TWO murders that he was charged with in 1963.

Nor has Judyth focused very heavily on another very important aspect of the JFK murder case -- the ACTIONS and the PROVABLE LIES of her "lover", both before and after the assassination of President Kennedy.

Judyth even admits (as recently as her April 10, 2009, e-mail to Rich DellaRosa) that "I am not a 'researcher' about the JFK assassination".

In short, Judyth Vary Baker either has been inflicted with a terminal case of "denial" regarding the obvious guilt of Lee Oswald, or (perhaps) she can be
defined as author Vincent Bugliosi defines her in Vince's 2007 JFK book "Reclaiming History" -- "a sick puppy".

==================================================

FOLLOW-UP POSTS:


MARTIN SHACKELFORD SAID:

[John] McAdams claims Judyth [Vary Baker] "must have" studied the literature extensively. You take the opposite position to argue the same conclusion.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Judyth no doubt studied a lot of the details regarding Oswald and his whereabouts on certain days prior to 11/22/63, etc., yes. She would have HAD to study those kind of pre-November 22 details in order for her lies to have any chance whatsoever of being believed (by anyone).

The chronology of Judyth's fairy tale, though, ends in mid-November of 1963 (prior to the assassination itself, of course), so she doesn't need to memorize any of the details pertaining to LHO or the assassination AFTER the point in time when she says she last saw him or talked to him.

Which makes me continue to wonder if Judyth ever studied (in some depth) the details of THE ASSASSINATION ITSELF, which includes Lee Oswald's own actions and lies AFTER the murders that LHO so obviously committed in Dallas.

So, I was referring mainly to the evidence against Oswald AFTER 12:30 PM on 11/22/63 when I said this in an earlier post:

"My guess is that Judyth probably has not seriously studied and evaluated the hard evidence that exists against Lee Oswald in the TWO murders that he was charged with in 1963. Nor has Judyth focused very heavily on another very important aspect of the JFK murder case -- the ACTIONS and the PROVABLE LIES of her "lover", both before and after the assassination of President Kennedy." -- DVP; May 4, 2009


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

That's the easy way to avoid discussing tough issues. Just call everyone a liar.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I've called very few people outright "liars". Very, very few, in fact.

By my rough count, I think I've only called three people who are "connected" in some way with the JFK case "liars" in any of my forum posts over the years:

1.) Roger Craig
2.) Jean Hill
3.) Judyth Vary Baker

It's possible (and probable) that a few more people could/should be added to the above list as proven "liars" (such as Paul O'Connor, Ed Hoffman, and Gordon Arnold, to name just three more); but I think I've used the word "liar" only when speaking of the three individuals named above. (Not counting members of JFK newsgroups and forums, of course.)


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

Did Judyth ever say Lee was innocent?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Good gosh, Tony....READ!!

What do you think these words from Judyth's own mouth mean?:

"I have given up everything for the sake of one person--Lee Oswald--and I seek his exoneration and vindication." -- Judyth Vary Baker; April 10, 2009

Tony,

Do you think that Judyth is seeking to "exonerate" and "vindicate" a person whom she believes to be GUILTY of killing President Kennedy and Officer Tippit? That would be a rather strange (not to mention evil) thing to do, wouldn't it (even if she DID have a love affair with Lee Harvey)?

Marsh Addendum---

I've come to the conclusion that conspiracy theorist Anthony Marsh just simply loves to be confrontational--regardless of the subject matter or assassination sub-topic. He just flat-out craves an argument...no matter what.

A curious hobby indeed. But it's one that Anthony has apparently devoted his life to.


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

Maybe it means, just like Oswald's mother, she [Judyth Vary Baker] thinks that Lee participated in the assassination, but under orders of the CIA.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Nope. Judyth thinks Lee Harvey Oswald was totally innocent of "participating" in the assassination (with "participating" meaning taking a gun and firing it at JFK). At least that was Judyth's position as of May 13, 2004.

Judyth Vary Baker's make-believe fantasies can be heard (in some detail) in the 2-part "Black Op Radio" program from 5/13/04. It's a real howl. [That program is now unavailable.]

And to hear more of Judyth Baker's lies and fairy tales, click the links below (which contain two interviews Baker did with conspiracy kook James H. Fetzer in 2010):

PART 1 (APRIL 30, 2010)

PART 2 (MAY 3, 2010)

==================================================

EXCERPTS FROM VINCENT BUGLIOSI'S BOOK "RECLAIMING HISTORY" (CONCERNING THE
TOPIC OF JUDYTH VARY BAKER):

"The story Judyth [Vary Baker] came up with was so fraudulent on its face that even most conspiracy theorists have ganged up on her to debunk it. .... Judyth's story started when she saw Oliver Stone's fantasy film 'JFK' in 1998 and decided she had an even bigger fantasy story to tell, partially through the technique of "recovered" memory.

"And as with so many of the fantastic tales told by nuts in the assassination saga, there's some small kernel of truth on which she built her fable: the fact that for a short period in the late spring and summer of 1963, she may have worked for the same company in New Orleans that Oswald did, William B. Reily and Company, Inc. ....

"Before she got her job there, Judyth...was on the fast track to a bright and promising future flipping hamburgers at a small White Castle chain restaurant in New Orleans. But because Judyth had shown promise [in high school]...for her amateur work on cancer research...she says she was recruited...into a clandestine project funded by the CIA and Mafia: developing a bioweapon with which to kill Fidel Castro. ....

"It was around this time that she met and fell hopelessly in love with Lee Harvey Oswald, who became a part of the project and with whom she had a torrid sexual affair.

"In an amusing footnote to the affair, Judyth said that their feelings for each other got "out of control," and they "were so desperate we even slept together in a red van that was being overhauled in Adrian Alba's garage." .... But she said that when Clay Shaw learned about their lack of money forcing them to make love in such places, he felt sorry for them and started paying for their trysts at nice hotels in the city. ....

"Just how does Judyth say she came by her knowledge? She claims she either personally met conspiracy icons like Jack Ruby, David Ferrie, Carlos Marcello, Clay Shaw, Guy Banister, et cetera, or Lee told her about them during pillow talk. So the remarkable 20-year-old, in just a few months, had more contact in New Orleans with the leading figures of conspiracy lore than perhaps any other known figure in the conspiracy community. I, for one, find this to be perfectly reasonable. ....

"Judyth claims the National Enquirer offered her $600,000 for her story (an amount the publisher might offer if Jesus returned and his agent promised an exclusive), but Judyth apparently wasn't interested. Only British producer Nigel Turner, who has made a fortune peddling phony stories, gave Judyth national exposure, devoting a full segment to her on his television show 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy'. ....

"It is an established fact that the CIA did do research...to develop some medical concoction to kill Castro. But what we didn't know until Judyth told us was that the CIA decided to also fund the motley group in New Orleans [consisting of Judyth, Oswald, and David Ferrie]. ....

"Judyth Baker has been called a "pathological liar." Although her story is a lie, this might be too harsh an indictment. From what I have read, she sounds more like a sick puppy to me. ....

"If anyone even had the smallest doubt that Judyth is a gold-plated phony, all he or she has to do to remove that doubt is to read (if you can withstand the pain) Baker's book ["Lee Harvey Oswald: The True Story Of The Accused Assassin Of President John F. Kennedy By His Lover"; Volumes 1 and 2]. ....

"Baker's book is a total, embarrassing failure. Is there any way to stop Judyth from continuing to propagate her fantasy? Two volumes of nonsense [and it's now up to three volumes], at this late date, show that the answer to this question is no."

-- Vincent T. Bugliosi; Pages 539-541 and 543-544 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History: The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy" (c.2007)

==================================================

David Von Pein
May 2009
September 2010

LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (MAY 4, 2009)

==================================================


JUDYTH VARY BAKER
(PART 2)

==================================================

MISC. JFK POSTS OF INTEREST (PART 23)

IN LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S ROOM:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/DfAImX9BK7c/Llyr0EBKiYcJ
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/In Oswald's Room


THE MINOX CAMERA:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/lGlxSif5zTM/-mD1UZVo-PkJ


JACK E. DOUGHERTY:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/rbRE9hZRuT8J
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/3Z158evTYQwJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/MMH0SMLbSZQJ


OSWALD'S NOVEMBER 22 CAB RIDE:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/Ag7n4P0Pq4U/52T_tF75PvoJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/Ag7n4P0Pq4U/LORx71wZNcMJ


THE SBT AND CE903 (AGAIN):
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/pxcmcp3_WhE/jpGb0PwUq1EJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/bga8EjFFXpo/nEn4bb1IzmYJ


WC, HSCA, HUMES, VB, AND RH:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/w86fMKfLViMJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/b6Dw_uYGhz0/WVP0ZBSR6AcJ


OLIVER STONE:
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/index.html#Oliver-Stone


A NEARLY PERFECT DESCRIPTION OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/JTxGkSYZrZ4/_E_4sNzo85IJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/JTxGkSYZrZ4/c2Rpb04R8H0J


"AN OUT AND OUT SHILL FOR BUGLIOSI":
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/Vxu57Cn8qv8/b9gPrqSDgYkJ


DVP VS. RICH DELLAROSA:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/qfeI_EGGwk4/qZ_3WNY4SqkJ


DVP VS. WALT CAKEBREAD:
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/dv-l_ljuy0oJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/3pIiMh4ewl8/rRFCG0EtwTwJ
https://alt.conspiracy.jfk/JTxGkSYZrZ4/5X7gwWl_mRoJ


================================

INDEX / TABLE OF CONTENTS

THIS WEBSITE'S
INDEX AND
TABLE OF CONTENTS:





























--------------------------


















JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(CBS-TV COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(NBC-TV COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(ABC-TV COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WFAA-TV COVERAGE)
(DALLAS, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(NBC-RADIO COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(ABC-RADIO COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KLIF-RADIO COVERAGE)
(DALLAS, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WBAP-RADIO COVERAGE)
(FORT WORTH, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KRLD-RADIO COVERAGE)
(DALLAS, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KBOX-RADIO COVERAGE)
(DALLAS, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WFAA-RADIO COVERAGE)
(DALLAS, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WLW-RADIO COVERAGE)
(CINCINNATI, OHIO)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KILT-RADIO COVERAGE)
(HOUSTON, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WCCO-RADIO COVERAGE)
(MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WTIC-RADIO COVERAGE)
(HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KXOL-RADIO COVERAGE)
(FORT WORTH, TEXAS)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KNX-RADIO COVERAGE)
(LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WHBC-RADIO COVERAGE)
(CANTON, OHIO)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(KXA-RADIO COVERAGE)
(SEATTLE, WASHINGTON)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING
RADIO COVERAGE)


JFK ASSASSINATION: AS IT HAPPENED
(MUTUAL BROADCASTING
RADIO COVERAGE)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD
HAS BEEN SHOT!


JFK ASSASSINATION AFTERMATH
(VIDEO & AUDIO FROM
NOVEMBER 23-27, 1963)


JFK ASSASSINATION
RADIO BULLETINS


TELEVISION NEWS FILMS
FROM NOVEMBER 22, 1963


CHICAGO RADIO & TV CLIPS
FROM NOVEMBER 22-23, 1963


BBC-RADIO NEWS & COMMENTARY
(NOVEMBER 24, 1963)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S
FUNERAL SERVICES


JFK EULOGIES


JFK ASSASSINATION FILMS


"JFK: 3 SHOTS THAT
CHANGED AMERICA"
(2009 DOCUMENTARY)


"JOHN F. KENNEDY:
YEARS OF LIGHTNING, DAY OF DRUMS"


DAVID L. WOLPER'S
"FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER"
(1964)


"FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER"
(VARIOUS LINKS)


"THE LAST TWO DAYS"


"FACES OF NOVEMBER"


"THE DAY THE PRESIDENT WAS SHOT"
(ABC-RADIO SPECIAL PROGRAM)


"FOUR DAYS THAT SHOCKED THE WORLD: NOVEMBER 22-25, 1963"


JFK IN FORT WORTH, TEXAS,
ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963


JFK ARRIVES IN DALLAS, TEXAS,
ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963


"PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S FINAL HOUR"
(DALLAS CINEMA ASSOCIATES FILM)


"PRESIDENT KENNEDY IN TEXAS"
(1963 WBAP-TV SPECIAL)


INTERVIEWS WITH
THE GENERAL PUBLIC
FOLLOWING JFK'S ASSASSINATION
(NOVEMBER 22-25, 1963)


MEDIA ERRORS IN REPORTING
JFK'S ASSASSINATION


PRE-ASSASSINATION
RADIO NEWSCASTS
FROM NOVEMBER 22, 1963


"A YEAR AGO TODAY"
(1964 WFAA-TV SPECIAL)


"WHO SHOT PRESIDENT KENNEDY?"
(1988 PBS-TV DOCUMENTARY)


"WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD?"
(1993 PBS-TV DOCUMENTARY)


"A CBS NEWS EXTRA:
NOV. 22ND AND THE WARREN REPORT"
(1964 CBS-TV SPECIAL)


"A CBS NEWS INQUIRY:
THE WARREN REPORT"
(1967 CBS-TV SPECIAL)


"THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION:
BEYOND CONSPIRACY"
(2003 ABC-TV DOCUMENTARY)


"JFK: THE FINAL HOURS"
(2013 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
DOCUMENTARY)


"THE WARREN COMMISSION"
(1999 DOCUMENTARY)


"JFK: BEYOND THE MAGIC BULLET"
(2004 DOCUMENTARY)


"JFK: BREAKING THE NEWS"
(2003 DOCUMENTARY)


"PRESIDENT KENNEDY HAS BEEN SHOT"
(2003 DOCUMENTARY)


PRESS CONFERENCES WITH DALLAS
DISTRICT ATTORNEY HENRY WADE


INTERVIEWS WITH DALLAS
POLICE CHIEF JESSE CURRY
(NOVEMBER 22 & 23, 1963)


INTERVIEWS WITH DALLAS POLICEMEN
M.N. McDONALD AND PAUL BENTLEY


INTERVIEWS WITH DALLAS POLICE
SERGEANT GERALD HILL
(NOVEMBER 22, 1963)


COMMENTARY BY PAUL HARVEY ON
NOVEMBER 22 & NOVEMBER 26, 1963


THE CBS EVENING NEWS
WITH WALTER CRONKITE
(NOVEMBER 22, 1963)


THE CBS EVENING NEWS
WITH WALTER CRONKITE
(NOVEMBER 25, 1963)


"PRESIDENTS AND ASSASSINS"
(CBS NEWS SPECIAL REPORT,
AIRED ON NOVEMBER 25, 1963)


"THE FOUR DARK DAYS"
(CBS NEWS SPECIAL,
AIRED ON NOVEMBER 25, 1963)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD
ON THE RADIO


IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW
WITH MARY MOORMAN
(MAY 24, 2011)


2009 INTERVIEW WITH
DR. ROBERT McCLELLAND


INTERVIEWS WITH DR. JAMES HUMES
AND DR. J. THORNTON BOSWELL
(SEPTEMBER 16, 1977)


INTERVIEW WITH DR. PIERRE FINCK
(MARCH 12, 1978)


INTERVIEW WITH EVELYN LINCOLN
(JANUARY 21, 1964)


MISC. HSCA TESTIMONY
(AUDIO VERSIONS)


VIDEO PLAYLIST:
JFK ASSASSINATION WITNESSES


WITNESSES
(PART 2)


RADIO PROGRAM WITH THREE WARREN
COMMISSION COUNSEL MEMBERS
(NOVEMBER 7, 1966)


TWO CONSPIRACY MYTHS DEBUNKED
IN UNDER THREE MINUTES


1963 SECRET SERVICE RECONSTRUCTION FILM


1964 SECRET SERVICE FILM
(NARRATED BY JIM UNDERWOOD)


BOSTON SYMPHONY ANNOUNCEMENT
ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963


AIRCRAFT RADIO TRANSMISSIONS
FROM NOVEMBER 22, 1963


DALLAS POLICE RADIO TAPES
FROM NOVEMBER 22, 1963


JOHN F. KENNEDY
TELEPHONE CALLS
AND AUDIO RECORDINGS


LYNDON B. JOHNSON PHONE CALLS
(1963-1964)


JIM GARRISON VS. JOHNNY CARSON
(JANUARY 31, 1968)


INTERVIEWS AND DEBATES
WITH MARK LANE


MARK LANE'S "RUSH TO JUDGMENT"
(1967)


"THE TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD"
(1964)


"THE TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD"
(1977 TV MOVIE)


"RUBY AND OSWALD"
(1978 TV MOVIE)


"SUDDENLY"
(1954 FRANK SINATRA FILM)


1966 INTERVIEW WITH JACK RUBY
(SHORTLY BEFORE HIS DEATH)


RADIO DEBATES FEATURING
JOHN McADAMS


MORE JFK ASSASSINATION DEBATES
AND DISCUSSION


"THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT:
THE PRESS CONFERENCES OF JFK"


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S
FIRST AND LAST
PRESS CONFERENCES


ALL 64 OF JFK'S PRESIDENTIAL
PRESS CONFERENCES


THE 1960 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
(INCLUDING ALL FOUR
KENNEDY-NIXON DEBATES)


"THE MAKING OF THE PRESIDENT 1960"
(1963 DAVID L. WOLPER FILM)


"NBC WHITE PAPER:
THE AGE OF KENNEDY"
(1966 NBC-TV DOCUMENTARY)


"THE LIFE AND TIMES OF
JOHN F. KENNEDY"
(1964 DOCUMENTARY)


"KENNEDYS DON'T CRY"
(1975 DOCUMENTARY)


"THE END OF CAMELOT"
(1993 DOCUMENTARY)


"THE KENNEDY MYSTIQUE:
CREATING CAMELOT"
(2004 DOCUMENTARY)


"THE DEATH OF JFK AND
THE WARREN REPORT"
(1994 DOCUMENTARY)


"JFK IN IRELAND"
(1993 DOCUMENTARY)


NBC NEWS TIME CAPSULE
FEATURING JOHN F. KENNEDY
(INCLUDES JFK'S OLDEST SURVIVING
TELEVISION INTERVIEW, FROM 1951)


CANDID KENNEDY FILMS


"MEET THE PRESS"
(FEATURING JFK, RFK, & OTHERS)


THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS


"THE MISSILES OF OCTOBER"
(1974 TV MOVIE)


JFK TALKS ABOUT CUBA
(FEBRUARY 7, 1963)


JFK IN SAN DIEGO
(JUNE 6, 1963)


FUTURE PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON
MEETS JOHN F. KENNEDY
(JULY 24, 1963)


A TOUR OF THE WHITE HOUSE
WITH MRS. JOHN F. KENNEDY


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S
INAUGURAL ADDRESS
(JANUARY 20, 1961)


ALL THREE OF JFK'S
"STATE OF THE UNION"
ADDRESSES


JFK'S "HEALTH CARE" SPEECH FROM MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
(MAY 20, 1962)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S
"PEACE" SPEECH
(JUNE 10, 1963)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S
"CIVIL RIGHTS" SPEECH
(JUNE 11, 1963)


JFK'S "SPACE" SPEECH
(SEPTEMBER 12, 1962)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY
IN CHICAGO
(MARCH 23, 1963)


JFK'S SPEECH IN NEW YORK CITY
SHORTLY AFTER THE BAY OF PIGS
(APRIL 27, 1961)


JFK'S SPEECH ON THE STATE OF
THE NATION'S ECONOMY
(AUGUST 13, 1962)


WGN-TV INTERVIEW WITH JFK
ON OPENING DAY OF THE 1961
BASEBALL SEASON IN WASHINGTON


JFK'S SPEECH IN
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
(MARCH 10, 1962)


JFK'S SPEECH IN MILWAUKEE
(MAY 12, 1962)


"AFTER TWO YEARS"
(1962 INTERVIEW WITH JFK)


1963 INTERVIEWS WITH
PRESIDENT KENNEDY


JFK'S CONSERVATION TOUR
(SEPTEMBER 24-28, 1963)


Q&A SESSIONS
WITH JFK


JFK'S LAST SPEECHES
(SEPTEMBER—NOVEMBER 1963)


A&E BIOGRAPHY:
JACKIE KENNEDY


A&E BIOGRAPHY:
LEE HARVEY OSWALD


ROBERT F. KENNEDY SPEAKS OUT IN FAVOR OF THE WARREN COMMISSION
(MARCH 25, 1968)


RFK AND JFK PRESENT MEDALS TO
THREE YOUNG AMERICANS
(JUNE 8, 1962)


TELEPHONE CALLS BETWEEN
JFK AND RFK


"THE U.S. SENATOR
JOHN F. KENNEDY STORY"
(1958)


"THE FIRST FAMILY"
RECORD ALBUMS
(FEATURING VAUGHN MEADER)


THE DEATH OF
JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.


KENNEDY PHOTO ALBUM


JFK MARATHON VIDEOS


DEALEY PLAZA SLIDESHOW
(JUNE 2004)


DEALEY PLAZA VIDEO AND PHOTOS
(OCTOBER 30, 2012)


NEWSREELS FROM 1961


NEWSREELS FROM 1962


THE HISTORY OF THE
SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM
AT DEALEY PLAZA


"PARKLAND"
(2013 MOVIE)


THE JFK ASSASSINATION
AND WOODY ALLEN


ALSO VISIT THESE
AUDIO/VIDEO WEBSITES:















-----------------------------




"BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT"
BY MEL AYTON with DAVID VON PEIN
(BOOK PAGE)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT:
POINT-BY-POINT


OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT
(PART 2)


SIX THINGS MADE TO ORDER FOR
LEE HARVEY OSWALD


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S MOTIVE
(PART 1)


OSWALD'S MOTIVE
(PART 2)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S DECISION
TO SHOOT PRESIDENT KENNEDY


NOVEMBER 22, 1963:
A LEE HARVEY OSWALD "TIMELINE"
(PART 1)


NOVEMBER 22, 1963:
A LEE HARVEY OSWALD "TIMELINE"
(PART 2)


RECONSTRUCTING THE STEPS OF
A PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSIN


THESE TWO THINGS PROVE
LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S GUILT


SOLID VALIDATION THAT
LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS
IN THE SNIPER'S NEST


CONSTRUCTING
LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S
SNIPER'S NEST


POSITIONING THE GUNMAN
IN THE SNIPER'S NEST


IN LEE OSWALD'S ROOM ON
NOVEMBER 22, 1963


EVERYTHING LEE HARVEY OSWALD
DID INDICATES HIS GUILT


IF OSWALD WAS INNOCENT,
WHY DID HE ACT SO GUILTY?


WHY DID OSWALD DENY
KILLING PRESIDENT KENNEDY?


DUPLICATING OSWALD'S FEAT


"WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD?"
(1993 PBS-TV DOCUMENTARY)


SYLVIA ODIO
(PART 1)


SYLVIA ODIO
(PART 2)


OSWALD IN MEXICO CITY
(PART 1)


OSWALD IN MEXICO CITY
(PART 2)


WAS OSWALD PAID $6,500 TO
KILL PRESIDENT KENNEDY?


IF OSWALD HAD ACCOMPLICES,
WHERE WERE THEY WHEN HE
NEEDED THEM THE MOST?


GENERAL EDWIN WALKER
AND LEE HARVEY OSWALD


WALKER AND OSWALD
(PART 2)


THE WALKER SHOOTING
(PART 3)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND
THE NIXON INCIDENT


LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS A LIAR (PART 1)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS A LIAR (PART 2)


MORE OSWALD LIES (VIA HIS BOOK DEPOSITORY WORK APPLICATION)


OSWALD'S "A.J. HIDELL" ALIAS


CAPTAIN FRITZ' NOTES


LEE OSWALD, HIS CO-WORKERS, AND THE DEPOSITORY ELEVATORS


THE SECOND-FLOOR
LUNCHROOM ENCOUNTER


LEE HARVEY OSWALD, MARRION BAKER, ROY TRULY, AND THE COCA-COLA


DR. PEPPER TALK


WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD
"DOORWAY MAN"?


"DOORWAY MAN"
(PART 2)


"OUT WITH BILL SHELLEY IN FRONT"


MORE DISCUSSION ABOUT OSWALD'S
WHEREABOUTS AT 12:30 PM
ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963


LEE HARVEY OSWALD IN
NEW ORLEANS IN AUGUST 1963
(A LOOK AT COMMISSION EXHIBIT 826)


PROSECUTING LEE HARVEY OSWALD (PART 1)


PROSECUTING LEE HARVEY OSWALD (PART 2)


HOW WOULD YOU DEFEND
LEE HARVEY OSWALD
IN A COURT OF LAW?


EXAMINING LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S
"I'M JUST A PATSY" STATEMENT


THE "PATSY PLOT" SILLINESS
(PART 1)


THE "PATSY PLOT" SILLINESS
(PART 2)


THE "PATSY PLOT" SILLINESS
(PART 3)


HOW TO FRAME A LONE PATSY
FOR JFK'S MURDER -- AND HOW
NOT TO DO IT


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S ALIBI


"WELL, THEY SAY IT JUST
TAKES A SECOND TO DIE"


DID LEE HARVEY OSWALD HATE
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?


WAS LEE OSWALD "PLACED" IN THE BOOK DEPOSITORY BY PLOTTERS?


THE "TWO OSWALDS" THEORY


DID OSWALD REALLY LIVE AT
1026 NORTH BECKLEY AVENUE?


MORE OSWALD IMPOSTERS?


THE POLICE LINEUPS


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S
MIDNIGHT PRESS CONFERENCE


LEE HARVEY OSWALD
ON THE RADIO


PRE-11/22/63 NEWSPAPER ARTICLES
ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD


MOCK TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD
HELD IN DALLAS ON JUNE 21, 2013

-----------------------------




THE WARREN COMMISSION
GOT IT RIGHT (PART 1)


THE WARREN COMMISSION
GOT IT RIGHT (PART 2)


THE WARREN COMMISSION'S OBJECTIVES


THE SHOOTING TIMELINE AND THE
"5.6 SECONDS" CONSPIRACY MYTH


DID THE WARREN COMMISSION LIE?


INDEX OF
WARREN COMMISSION
EXHIBITS

-----------------------------




A COMMON-SENSE APPROACH TO
THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY


THE ULTIMATE IN "SBT" DENIAL
AMONG CONSPIRACY THEORISTS


THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY IN ACTION (PART 1)


THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY IN ACTION (PART 2)


THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY IN ACTION (PART 3)


"SBT" ZAPRUDER FILM CLIPS


WHERE'S THE LOGICAL CONSPIRACY-ORIENTED ALTERNATIVE TO THE SBT?


MORE SBT TALK (WITH A LARGE DOSE OF COMMON SENSE INCLUDED)


GERALD FORD AND THE SBT


THE "SBT PERFECTION" OF WARREN COMMISSION EXHIBIT 903


CE903 (PART 2)


CE903 (PART 3)


CE903 (PART 4)


ARLEN SPECTER'S SBT NOTEBOOK
(TONGUE-IN-CHEEK VERSION)


DVP VS. A CONSPIRACY THEORIST (THE TOPIC: THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S WOUNDS AND
MORE SINGLE-BULLET DISCUSSION


SOME THINGS RELATING TO THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY HAD
TO BE APPROXIMATED


THE MOVEMENT OF
GOVERNOR CONNALLY'S LAPEL


JOHN CONNALLY SAID THE
SINGLE-BULLET THEORY
IS "POSSIBLE"


ANOTHER
"SINGLE-BULLET THEORY"
LINK


AND STILL MORE "SBT" TALK


VINCE BUGLIOSI, DALE MYERS,
3-D DIAGRAMS, AND THE
SINGLE-BULLET THEORY


DALE MYERS' COMPUTER ANIMATION AND THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY
(PART 1)


DALE MYERS' COMPUTER ANIMATION AND THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY
(PART 2)


AND YET ANOTHER "SBT" DISCUSSION
(JUST FOR GOOD MEASURE)

-----------------------------




LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S
MANNLICHER-CARCANO


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 2)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 3)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 4)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 5)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 6)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 7)


OSWALD'S RIFLE
(PART 8)


THE
"OSWALD NEVER ORDERED THE RIFLE"
MYTH


OSWALD AND
KLEIN'S SPORTING GOODS


THE "HIDELL" MONEY ORDER


MAUSER OR CARCANO?


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S REVOLVER


OSWALD'S RIFLE -- STOLEN BY PLOTTERS? OR USED BY
OSWALD TO KILL JFK?


THE "BACKYARD PHOTOS"
(PART 1)


THE "BACKYARD PHOTOS"
(PART 2)


TWO IMPORTANT POINTS
ABOUT THE EVIDENCE
AND LEE HARVEY OSWALD


LIEUTENANT J.C. DAY AND THE
PRINTS FOUND ON OSWALD'S RIFLE


WAS OSWALD FINGERPRINTED
AFTER HE DIED?


CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE


NOW, ABOUT THOSE "CURTAIN RODS"
OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S...


CURTAIN RODS
(PART 2)


OSWALD'S JACKET AND
OSWALD'S HANDWRITING


OSWALD'S POST OFFICE BOX APPLICATIONS


THE POSTMARK ON
OSWALD'S ENVELOPE
(COMMISSION EXHIBIT 773)


TAKING IT TO THE "2 BULLETS" BANK


THE FRONT-SEAT BULLET FRAGMENTS
(CE567 AND CE569)


DIGITALLY PRESERVING THE
JFK ASSASSINATION BULLETS


WAS THERE A HOLE IN THE
LIMOUSINE'S WINDSHIELD?


BUELL WESLEY FRAZIER,
LINNIE MAE RANDLE,
AND THE PAPER BAG


LEE HARVEY OSWALD, HIS RIFLE,
AND THE PAPER BAG


MORE "PAPER BAG"
DISCUSSION


STILL MORE ABOUT FRAZIER, RANDLE,
PAPER BAGS, CARPORT SLATS,
AND CURTAIN RODS


SOME QUESTIONS FOR
BUELL WESLEY FRAZIER


VINCENT DRAIN'S CONFLICTING
REPORTS CONCERNING THE
TSBD PAPER SAMPLES


PARAFFIN TESTS
(PART 1)


PARAFFIN TESTS
(PART 2)


PARAFFIN TESTS
(PART 3)


JFK'S SHIRT FIBERS


BULLET SHELL EJECTION TESTS


DOCTORED EVIDENCE?
OR ORDINARY HUMAN ERRORS?


DEBUNKING THE ACOUSTICS EVIDENCE
(PART 1)


DEBUNKING THE ACOUSTICS EVIDENCE
(PART 2)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S WALLETS
(PART 1)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S WALLETS
(PART 2)


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S WALLETS
(PART 3)


THE HEAD SHOT, THE BULLET FRAGMENTS, AND
DR. VINCENT GUINN'S "NAA" ANALYSIS


MORE ABOUT DR. GUINN AND THE NAA BULLET-FRAGMENT TESTS


IS THERE ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
OF A CONSPIRACY?


DID THE POLICE FAKE THE EVIDENCE
IN THE SNIPER'S NEST?


WAS ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE PLANTED
TO FRAME LEE HARVEY OSWALD?


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


DISCUSSING THE EVIDENCE (AGAIN)

-----------------------------




JACK RUBY:
THE SECOND "LONE NUT"
ASSASSIN IN DALLAS


HOW DID JACK RUBY GET INTO THE DALLAS POLICE BASEMENT?


JACK RUBY AND THE BASEMENT
(PART 2)


WHY DID JACK RUBY SHOOT
LEE HARVEY OSWALD?


JACK RUBY AND KAREN CARLIN


THE UBIQUITOUS JACK RUBY
AND RUBY'S POLYGRAPH TEST


INTERVIEWS WITH HENRY WADE THAT
WERE ARRANGED BY JACK RUBY

-----------------------------




THE MURDER OF OFFICER J.D. TIPPIT
(PART 1)


THE MURDER OF OFFICER J.D. TIPPIT
(PART 2)


THE MURDER OF OFFICER J.D. TIPPIT
(PART 3)


THE MURDER OF OFFICER J.D. TIPPIT
(PART 4)


ACQUILLA CLEMONS AND THE
MURDER OF OFFICER TIPPIT


JOHNNY BREWER AND THE
TIPPIT SHOOTING


THE TIPPIT MURDER AND THE HILARIOUS DEFENSE OF
LEE HARVEY OSWALD


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S REVOLVER


DALE MYERS, DON THOMAS, AND THE MURDER OF OFFICER J.D. TIPPIT


PHOTO GALLERY OF THE J.D. TIPPIT
MURDER SITE & SURROUNDING AREA

-----------------------------




THE MINDSET OF
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS


QUESTIONS NEVER ANSWERED
BY CONSPIRACY THEORISTS


ISOLATING THE EVIDENCE:
A CONSPIRACIST'S FORTE


HOW FAR WILL CONSPIRACY KOOKS GO IN TRYING TO EXONERATE OSWALD?


THERE'S NO ROOM FOR OCCAM IN A CONSPIRACY THEORIST'S WORLD


JFK CONSPIRACY THEORIES GALORE


FOR JFK CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, THE DUST NEVER SETTLES IN DEALEY PLAZA


WHY DO SO MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE
THIS CRAZY THEORY?


DAVID LIFTON


HAROLD WEISBERG


JOSIAH THOMPSON


MARK LANE


JIM GARRISON


OLIVER STONE


JAMES DiEUGENIO


ROBERT GRODEN


SYLVIA MEAGHER


JESSE VENTURA


ORLANDO MARTIN
(PART 1)


ORLANDO MARTIN
(PART 2)


DOUGLAS P. HORNE'S SILLINESS
(PART 1)


DOUG HORNE
(PART 2)


DOUG HORNE
(PART 3)


DOUG HORNE
(PART 4)

-----------------------------




ATTEMPTING TO EXPLAIN HOW SO MANY WITNESSES COULD HAVE BEEN MISTAKEN AS TO THE LOCATION OF
THE EXIT WOUND IN JFK'S HEAD


THE FORWARD MOTION OF
PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S HEAD
AT ZAPRUDER FRAME 313


THE ILLOGIC OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S HEAD WOUNDS (IF YOU'RE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST LIKE
DR. ROBERT McCLELLAND, THAT IS)


A VERY IMPORTANT AUTOPSY X-RAY


WAS THE BACK OF JFK'S HEAD
"BLACKED OUT"?


THE BACK-OF-THE-HEAD WOUND ("BOH") WITNESSES VS. THE AUTOPSY DOCTORS -- WHO'S RIGHT?


"BOH" TALK (PART 2)


"BOH" TALK (PART 3)


"BOH" TALK (PART 4)


"BOH" TALK (PART 5)


"BOH" TALK (PART 6)


"BOH" TALK (PART 7)


"BOH" TALK (PART 8)


"BOH" TALK (PART 9)


"BOH" TALK (PART 10)


"BOH" TALK (PART 11)


"BOH" TALK (PART 12)


"BOH" TALK (PART 13)


"BOH" TALK (PART 14)


"BOH" TALK (PART 15)


"BOH" TALK (PART 16)


"BOH" TALK (PART 17)


"BOH" TALK (PART 18)


"BOH" TALK (PART 19)


"BOH" TALK (PART 20)


"BOH" TALK (PART 21)


"BOH" TALK (PART 22)


"BOH" TALK (PART 23)


"BOH" TALK (PART 24)


"BOH" TALK (PART 25)


"BOH" TALK (PART 26)

-----------------------------




WITNESS AFFIDAVITS


MARINA OSWALD


MARINA OSWALD'S
PERSONAL NARRATIVE


DVP's CONVERSATION WITH
ASSASSINATION EYEWITNESS
MARY MOORMAN


RUTH PAINE (PART 1)


RUTH PAINE (PART 2):



JAMES TAGUE (PART 1)


JAMES TAGUE (PART 2)


JAMES TAGUE (PART 3)


HOWARD BRENNAN (PART 1)


HOWARD BRENNAN (PART 2)


HAROLD NORMAN (PART 1)


HAROLD NORMAN (PART 2)


BILL AND GAYLE NEWMAN


BILL NEWMAN (PART 2)


JOHN & NELLIE CONNALLY


BUELL WESLEY FRAZIER


LINNIE MAE RANDLE


JAMES LEAVELLE


ROBERT MacNEIL


IKE PAPPAS


BOB JACKSON


MAL COUCH


MARY WOODWARD


BOB HUFFAKER


GARY DeLAUNE


CHARLES BREHM


S.M. HOLLAND


JAMES ALTGENS


LEE BOWERS


JEAN HILL


KAREN WESTBROOK


DOMINGO BENAVIDES AND
EDWARD H. BENAVIDEZ


JACK TATUM


CAROLYN WALTHER


CECIL McWATTERS


JULIA ANN MERCER


ROGER CRAIG


TONY ZOPPI


DR. JAMES HUMES


RICHARD LIPSEY


MERRIMAN SMITH


CLAY SHAW & DEAN ANDREWS


RICHARD HELMS


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF MARGUERITE OSWALD


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
BUELL WESLEY FRAZIER


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
WILLIAM WHALEY


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
BARBARA DAVIS


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
JACK DOUGHERTY


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
ROBERT FRAZIER


EXAMINING THE TESTIMONY OF
DR. CHARLES PETTY


JACQUELINE KENNEDY'S TESTIMONY -- A MISSED OPPORTUNITY?


THE STRANGE TALES OF
PAUL O'CONNOR


VICTORIA ADAMS & SANDRA STYLES


HOWARD BRENNAN, MARRION BAKER,
AND ROY TRULY


MARRION BAKER, ROY TRULY,
AND JACK DOUGHERTY


CHARLES GIVENS


CAROLYN ARNOLD


MRS. ROBERT A. REID


GEORGE DeMOHRENSCHILDT'S
SUICIDE


HENRY WADE


BUDDY WALTHERS


H. LOUIS NICHOLS


JERRY BELKNAP


JULIA POSTAL


DAVID FERRIE


JAMES FILES


JUDYTH VARY BAKER (PART 1)


JUDYTH VARY BAKER (PART 2)


"BLACK DOG MAN"


THE DEALEY PLAZA EARWITNESSES


THREE SHOTS AND THREE SHELLS


THE 11/22/63 PARKLAND HOSPITAL PRESS CONFERENCE WITH DR. MALCOLM PERRY AND DR. KEMP CLARK


THE PARKLAND DOCTORS AND THEIR 1988 "NOVA" PBS-TV APPEARANCE

-----------------------------




ABRAHAM ZAPRUDER'S FAMOUS FILM
(VERSION CREATED BY DVP BY USING
EACH OF THE FILM'S 486 FRAMES)


THE ZAPRUDER FILM AND
THE FATAL HEAD SHOT


ZAPRUDER FILM CLIPS


THE MISSING FRAMES OF
THE ZAPRUDER FILM


WFAA-TV INTERVIEW WITH ABRAHAM ZAPRUDER ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963
(AND MORE)


THE ZAPRUDER FILM IS SHOWN ON
TELEVISION FOR THE FIRST TIME
(MARCH 6, 1975)


WAS THE ZAPRUDER FILM ALTERED?
(PART 1)


WAS THE ZAPRUDER FILM ALTERED?
(PART 2)

-----------------------------




JAMES HUMES AND
J. THORNTON BOSWELL


PIERRE FINCK


ROBERT McCLELLAND


JAMES W. SIBERT


FRANCIS X. O'NEILL


CLINT HILL AND GERALD BLAINE


THE ACOUSTICS/DICTABELT EVIDENCE:
AN INTERVIEW WITH CHARLES RADER


JFK ASSASSINATION DEBATE:
MARK LANE VS. JOSEPH BALL
(DECEMBER 4, 1964)


JFK ASSASSINATION DEBATE:
MARK LANE VS. WESLEY LIEBELER
(JANUARY 25, 1967)


MICHAEL BADEN VS. CYRIL WECHT


RADIO DEBATES FEATURING
JOHN McADAMS


INTERVIEWS WITH JOHN McADAMS


GERALD POSNER


MEL AYTON


Q&A WITH MEL AYTON &
DAVID VON PEIN


HUGH AYNESWORTH


HOWARD WILLENS


MARK FUHRMAN


DAVID REITZES


STEVE BARBER


ROBERT STONE


JAMES DiEUGENIO


DAVID MANTIK


BILL PAXTON


MORE JFK ASSASSINATION
DEBATES AND DISCUSSION


DVP INTERVIEW #1


DVP INTERVIEW #2


DEBATING THE JFK CASE
(A 60-PART SERIES)

-----------------------------




MARK LANE VS. VINCENT BUGLIOSI


MARK LANE AND HELEN MARKHAM


MARK LANE AND HELEN MARKHAM
(PART 2)


INTERVIEWS AND DEBATES
WITH MARK LANE

-----------------------------




JIM GARRISON WAS WRONG
(PART 1)


JIM GARRISON WAS WRONG
(PART 2)


JIM GARRISON VS. JOHNNY CARSON
(JANUARY 31, 1968)


JIM GARRISON ON
"THE STEVE ALLEN SHOW"
IN 1971


JIM GARRISON AND HIS
1967 NBC-TV "REBUTTAL"


IF CLAY SHAW WAS GUILTY, WHY DIDN'T JIM GARRISON DO THIS?

-----------------------------




OSWALD'S SHOOTING PERFORMANCE AND OLIVER STONE'S BLUNDER


THE BRAINWASHING OF AMERICA
(A LA OLIVER STONE)


OLIVER STONE AND
J.D. TIPPIT'S MURDER


MORE OLIVER STONE DISCUSSION


AND STILL MORE TALK ABOUT OLIVER STONE (AND JIM GARRISON TOO)


OLIVER STONE SPEAKS


DAVID BELIN TALKS ABOUT
OLIVER STONE'S MOVIE

-----------------------------




WAS CE399 A "PLANTED" BULLET?
(PART 1)


WAS CE399 A "PLANTED" BULLET?
(PART 2)


WAS CE399 A "PLANTED" BULLET?
(PART 3)


THE SECRET SERVICE
AND CE399


THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
FOR BULLET CE399


ELMER TODD'S INITIALS ARE ON
COMMISSION EXHIBIT 399
(SEE THOSE INITIALS HERE)


INTERVIEWS WITH PAUL LANDIS,
PLUS DISCUSSION ABOUT LANDIS'
ALLEGED BULLET DISCOVERY


A LETTER FROM VINCENT BUGLIOSI (CONCERNING THE ADMISSIBILITY
OF CE399 IN A COURT OF LAW)


TOO MANY CE399 BULLET FRAGMENTS IN JOHN CONNALLY? HARDLY


THE FACKLER BULLET


DARRELL TOMLINSON AND CE399
(PART 1)


DARRELL TOMLINSON AND CE399
(PART 2)


DARRELL TOMLINSON AND CE399
(PART 3)


DARRELL TOMLINSON AND CE399
(PART 4)

-----------------------------




THE DECEMBER 9, 1963, FBI REPORT
ON THE ASSASSINATION


THE FBI'S EARLY MISTAKES


J. EDGAR HOOVER, THE FBI,
AND LEE HARVEY OSWALD


THE HOSTY NOTE

-----------------------------




HENRY RYBKA, DON LAWTON, AND SECRET SERVICE CONFUSION
AT LOVE FIELD


THE SECRET SERVICE
AND CE399


FAKE SECRET SERVICE AGENTS
IN DEALEY PLAZA?


DID SECRET SERVICE AGENT
GEORGE HICKEY ACCIDENTALLY
KILL PRESIDENT KENNEDY?


THE FALSE RUMOR ABOUT A
SECRET SERVICE AGENT BEING
KILLED ON 11/22/63


1963 SECRET SERVICE FILM


1964 SECRET SERVICE FILM

-----------------------------




DAVID VON PEIN VS. JAMES DiEUGENIO
(PART 1)


DAVID VON PEIN VS. JAMES DiEUGENIO
(PART 2)


DAVID VON PEIN VS. JAMES DiEUGENIO
(PART 3)


QUESTIONS FOR JAMES DiEUGENIO


THE COMPLETE SERIES (137 PARTS):


-----------------------------




DAVID VON PEIN VS. DAVID LIFTON


DVP VS. JAMES DiEUGENIO


DVP VS. VINCENT PALAMARA


DVP VS. DOUG HORNE


DVP VS. ROBERT HARRIS


DVP VS. ANTHONY MARSH


DVP VS. PAT SPEER


DVP VS. GREG PARKER


DVP VS. WILLIAM KELLY


DVP VS. LEE FARLEY


DVP VS. PAMELA BROWN


DVP VS. DON JEFFRIES


DVP VS. RAY MITCHAM


DVP VS. JUDYTH VARY BAKER


DVP VS. CLIFF VARNELL


DVP VS. MARTIN HAY


DVP VS. JAMES FETZER


DVP VS. GARY AGUILAR


DVP VS. WILLY WHITTEN


DVP VS. BEN HOLMES


DVP VS. DAVID JOSEPHS


DVP VS. GIL JESUS


DVP VS. HERBERT BLENNER


DVP VS. JAMES R. GORDON


DVP VS. SANDY LARSEN


DVP VS. DONALD WILLIS


DVP VS. RICH DELLAROSA


DVP VS. JOSEPH McBRIDE


DVP VS. WALT CAKEBREAD


DVP VS. ROBERT PRUDHOMME


DVP VS. TONY FRATINI


DVP VS. ROBERT CAPRIO




-----------------------------




"ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD" (1986 TELEVISION DOCU-TRIAL, FEATURING VINCENT BUGLIOSI
AS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY)


"ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"
(TEXT EXCERPTS)


JULY 2007 TELEVISION INTERVIEW WITH VINCENT BUGLIOSI


VINCENT BUGLIOSI INTERVIEW
ON C-SPAN (NEARLY 3 HOURS)
(NOVEMBER 4, 2007)


RADIO INTERVIEW WITH
VINCENT BUGLIOSI
(OCTOBER 15, 2013)


MANY MORE INTERVIEWS
WITH VINCE BUGLIOSI
(60+ VIDEOS)


DVP's FAVORITE QUOTES
FROM "RECLAIMING HISTORY"


A DISCUSSION ABOUT
VINCENT BUGLIOSI'S
"53 PIECES OF EVIDENCE"


REFUTING DAVID LIFTON'S ALLEGATION THAT VINCENT BUGLIOSI'S "RECLAIMING HISTORY" WAS GHOSTWRITTEN BY SEVERAL
DIFFERENT AUTHORS


SETTING THE RECORD A LITTLE STRAIGHTER -- CORRECTING A FEW "RECLAIMING HISTORY" ERRORS


"RECLAIMING HISTORY" ERRORS
(PART 2)


"RECLAIMING HISTORY" ERRORS
(PART 3)


16 "SMOKING GUNS"?
OR 16 MISFIRES?


DVP VS. A CONSPIRACY THEORIST
(TOPICS: VINCENT BUGLIOSI,
"RECLAIMING HISTORY",
AND SOME OTHER STUFF TOO)


DVP's CORRESPONDENCE
WITH VINCENT BUGLIOSI
AND VINCE'S SECRETARY,
ROSEMARY NEWTON


VINCENT T. BUGLIOSI
(1934—2015)

-----------------------------




"RECLAIMING HISTORY"
BY VINCENT BUGLIOSI


"FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER"
BY VINCENT BUGLIOSI


"BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT"
BY MEL AYTON & DAVID VON PEIN


"WITH MALICE"
BY DALE MYERS


"THE JFK MYTHS"
BY LARRY STURDIVAN


"CASE CLOSED"
BY GERALD POSNER


"THE DEATH OF A PRESIDENT"
BY WILLIAM MANCHESTER


"THE DAY KENNEDY WAS SHOT"
BY JIM BISHOP


"NATIONAL NIGHTMARE
ON SIX FEET OF FILM"
BY RICHARD TRASK


"THAT DAY IN DALLAS"
BY RICHARD TRASK


"OSWALD'S GAME"
BY JEAN DAVISON


"CONSPIRACY OF ONE"
BY JIM MOORE


"KENNEDY AND LINCOLN"
BY DR. JOHN K. LATTIMER


"NOVEMBER 22, 1963:
YOU ARE THE JURY"
BY DAVID BELIN


"A SIMPLE ACT OF MURDER"
BY MARK FUHRMAN


"THE MEMORIES--JFK--1961-1963"


"WHEN THE NEWS WENT LIVE:
DALLAS 1963"
BY BOB HUFFAKER, BILL MERCER,
GEORGE PHENIX, & WES WISE


"BEST EVIDENCE"
BY DAVID LIFTON


"THE KILLING OF A PRESIDENT"
BY ROBERT GRODEN


DAVID L. WOLPER'S
"FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER"
(1964)


OLIVER STONE'S "JFK"
(1991)


MARK LANE'S "RUSH TO JUDGMENT"
(1967)


"EXECUTIVE ACTION"
(1973)


"OSWALD'S GHOST"
(2007)(PBS-TV)


"THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION: BEYOND CONSPIRACY" (2003)(ABC-TV)


"PRIMARY" (1960)(A DOCUMENTARY FILM BY ROBERT DREW)


"CRISIS" (1963)(A DOCUMENTARY FILM BY ROBERT DREW)


"NBC WHITE PAPER:
THE AGE OF KENNEDY"
(1966 NBC-TV DOCUMENTARY)


"THE MURDER OF JFK:
A REVISIONIST HISTORY"
(1999 DOCUMENTARY)


"JFK: A PRESIDENCY REVEALED"
(2003 DOCUMENTARY FROM
THE HISTORY CHANNEL)


"JFK: BEYOND THE MAGIC BULLET"
(2004)(THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL)


"JFK: THE LOST BULLET"
(2011)(NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)


"KENNEDY"
(1983 TELEVISION MINI-SERIES)


"JACQUELINE KENNEDY ONASSIS REMEMBERED" (CBS-TV)


"FOUR DAYS THAT SHOCKED THE WORLD: NOVEMBER 22-25, 1963"
(AUDIO CD)


"EVIDENCE OF REVISION"

-----------------------------




ASSORTED ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(MORE THAN 1,000 POSTS)


THE JFK ASSASSINATION
CONSPIRACY MYTHS
CONTINUE TO BE BELIEVED


CONSPIRACY MYTHS
(PART 2)


WAS JFK'S MOTORCADE ROUTE CHANGED AT THE LAST MINUTE?


WHAT DO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS
AND "LNers" AGREE ON?
ANYTHING AT ALL?


THE KATZENBACH MEMO


THE "6.5 MM. OBJECT"
ON JFK'S X-RAY


DO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS PROPERLY
AND FAIRLY EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE?


IF ONLY....


JFK'S BACK WOUND
(PART 1)


JFK'S BACK WOUND
(PART 2)


DR. PERRY, DAVID LIFTON, AND
THE TRACHEOTOMY WOUND
IN JFK'S THROAT


LET'S "DISSECT" JFK'S
NECK WOUND


MORE TALK ABOUT JFK'S WOUNDS
(PLUS SOME OTHER TOPICS)


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S BRAIN


WAS THERE "SECURITY STRIPPING"
IN DALLAS ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963?


THE "BUNCHING UP"
OF JFK'S CLOTHING


PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S NECKTIE


DR. HUMES AND THE
SIBERT/O'NEILL REPORT


REMOVING JFK'S
BODY FROM DALLAS


DID THE LIMOUSINE COME TO A
COMPLETE STOP ON ELM STREET?


THE SPACING OF THE GUNSHOTS
FIRED IN DEALEY PLAZA
(PLUS SOME "OCCIPITAL" TALK)


THE SMELL OF GUNPOWDER
IN DEALEY PLAZA


JFK'S ARM-RAISING: WAS IT "THORBURN'S POSITION"?
OR DOES IT MATTER?


WHAT ARE THE ODDS...?


ARE THESE SO-CALLED "MYSTERY DEATHS" REALLY SO MYSTERIOUS?


BACK AND TO THE LEFT


WHAT WAS JACKIE DOING
ON THE TRUNK?


SHOULD LEE HARVEY OSWALD BE
CONSIDERED THE "ALLEGED" ASSASSIN
OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY?


THE CHICAGO PLOT


FACTS VS. FANTASY


WAS THERE A SECOND WHOLE BULLET
FOUND AT PARKLAND HOSPITAL?


LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S CAB RIDE
ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963


EVALUATING ASSASSINATION POLLS


ALBERT THOMAS' “WINK”


THE ROLL CALL AT THE DEPOSITORY


HELEN MARKHAM'S BUS


BONNIE RAY WILLIAMS AND
THE CHICKEN BONES


ALTERED WITNESS STATEMENTS?


THE AUTOPSY, NSAM 263,
CE399's CHAIN OF CUSTODY,
AND A FEW OTHER THINGS


"PRAYER MAN"


A POTPOURRI OF
ASSASSINATION-RELATED
ARGUMENTS


"JFK: INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"
(PART 1)


"JFK: INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"
(PART 2)


"JFK: INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"
(PART 3)


"JFK: INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"
(PART 4)


"JFK: INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"
(PART 5)

-----------------------------




MISCELLANEOUS JFK-RELATED
POSTS AND ARTICLES
(MORE THAN 2,000 POSTS)


DEBATING THE JFK CASE
(A 60-PART SERIES)


JFK TRIVIA PAGE


THE 1968 CLARK PANEL REPORT


QUOTING COMMON SENSE


GETTING BACK TO BASICS


KNOWN VS. UNKNOWN EVIDENCE


LET'S BE REASONABLE
(PART 1)


LET'S BE REASONABLE
(PART 2)


WHY WOULD A PLOTTER DO THIS?


TOM ALYEA'S FILM


CHARLES BRONSON'S FILM


WHAT DID GOVERNOR CONNALLY
SEE ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963?
AND WHAT DIDN'T HE SEE?


A SHORTCUT TO BECOMING A LONE-ASSASSIN BELIEVER: WATCH THE 11/22/63 TELEVISION COVERAGE


AMERICA'S LONG VIGIL:
WHAT WE WATCHED ON TELEVISION
FROM NOVEMBER 22 TO 25, 1963


WHEN WAS LEE OSWALD'S NAME FIRST
MENTIONED ON TELEVISION & RADIO?


UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL:
THE FIRST BULLETINS


THE SHOT THAT MISSED
(PART 1)


THE SHOT THAT MISSED
(PART 2)


SCOPE VS. IRON SIGHTS


CE510 AND CE512
(THE TSBD BULLET SHELLS)


THE DEATH OF
DOROTHY KILGALLEN


GARY MACK
(1946—2015)


WALTER CRONKITE


STRIKING SIMILARITIES BETWEEN
THE JFK ASSASSINATION AND
THE O.J. SIMPSON MURDER CASE


HAPPENSTANCE OR CONSPIRACY?
(PART 1)


HAPPENSTANCE OR CONSPIRACY?
(PART 2)


HAPPENSTANCE OR CONSPIRACY?
(PART 3)


WERE THE CONSPIRATORS
USING A CRYSTAL BALL?


JFK ASSASSINATION DOCUMENTS:
HOW MANY REMAIN UNRELEASED?


DEJA VU IN DALLAS IN 2016?


ANNA K. NELSON AND THE
ASSASSINATION RECORDS
REVIEW BOARD


DVP VS. THE EDUCATION FORUM


STEPHEN KING
AND HIS BOOK "11/22/63"


"KILLING KENNEDY"
BY BILL O'REILLY


"CONSPIRACY THEORISTS LIE"
BY JAMES K. LAMBERT


"FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER"
(RE-CREATED MOVIE SCENES)


JFK PRESS CONFERENCES


THE TEXAS SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY
(PHOTOGRAPHS AND FLOOR PLANS)


DEALEY PLAZA PHOTOS
(DATING BACK TO 1935)


DVP's FAVORITE
KENNEDY PHOTOS


AIR FORCE ONE
PHOTO GALLERY


HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS FROM THE TV
COVERAGE OF JFK'S ASSASSINATION


NEWSPAPER ARTICLES CONCERNING
PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S TRIP TO TEXAS
(SEPTEMBER—NOVEMBER 1963)


NEWSPAPER FRONT PAGES FOR EACH
OF JOHN F. KENNEDY'S 1,037 DAYS
AS PRESIDENT (1961—1963)


SENATOR JOHN F. KENNEDY
VISITS DALLAS IN 1960
(PHOTO GALLERY)


---ENTERTAINMENT BREAK---
TELEVISION GAME SHOW:
"WHAT'S MY LINE?"
(KENNEDY-RELATED EPISODES)


DVP's AUDIO/VIDEO
MASTER INDEX
(LINKS & DISCUSSION)


A DAY WITH PRESIDENT KENNEDY
(MARCH 16, 1961)


LIFE MAGAZINE:
NOVEMBER 29, 1963


LIFE WITH JOHN F. KENNEDY


A REMARKABLE PAINTING
DEPICTING THE ASSASSINATION


THE KENNEDY FAMILY


HAPPY BIRTHDAY,
MR. PRESIDENT!


REMEMBERING NOVEMBER 22, 1963

-----------------------------

RELATED LINKS:










































-----------------------------



-----------------------------