JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
DAVID G. HEALY SAID:
There's a published article that announces my JFK-Zapruder film-alteration bonifides (and then some).
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
But that's not at all what I was talking about, was it Healy? No. Here's what I said:
"If somebody could point me toward the last acj post authored by Healy that says anything at all about the JFK case, I'd appreciate it." -- DVP; April 5, 2010
Where's your last ACJ post that contains even one granule of "JFK" substance? Even half-a-granule would suffice.
DAVID HEALY SAID:
Only problem with you lone nut morons is this: none of you have an ounce of Z-film alteration debate in you other than what Gary Mack & Company want you to profess.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
A six-year-old can easily debunk any of the silly Zapruder Film alterationists. The only thing that that six-year-old has to do is ask the conspiracy-loving nuts like David Healy and Doug Horne the following unanswerable question:
IF THE ZAPRUDER FILM HAS BEEN ALTERED IN ORDER TO HIDE ALL SIGNS OF A FRONTAL GUNSHOT (AND WHAT OTHER CONCEIVABLE REASON UNDER THE MOON COULD THERE BE FOR ANYONE TO WANT TO FAKE THE Z-FILM, OTHER THAN TO GET RID OF ALL OF THE VISUAL THINGS IN THE FILM THAT MIGHT LEAD PEOPLE TO THE IDEA THAT THERE WAS A "CONSPIRACY" INVOLVED IN JFK'S DEATH?)....THEN WHY DOES THE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ZAPRUDER FILM CONTAIN FOOTAGE OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S HEAD MOVING VIOLENTLY BACKWARD AND TO THE LEFT AFTER THE FATAL HEAD SHOT?
No loopy conspiracy theorist has ever once come up with even a halfway reasonable answer to the question I just asked. And they never will be able to provide any kind of a reasonable or logical or rational answer to that question I just now asked--and that's because there is no reasonable answer to that inquiry from the point-of-view of the silly alterationists like Douglas P. Horne and James H. Fetzer, et al.
Or do the alterationists like Horne and Fetzer REALLY want people to believe that the technicians who supposedly altered the Z-Film didn't think that the "back and to the left" motion of Kennedy's head in the film was an important enough thing to get rid of completely? Even though, as we all know, that very same "back and to the left" motion in the film is certainly the NUMBER ONE thing that causes most people to shout "He was shot from the front!"
Or maybe people like Horne and Fetzer want to believe that the idiots who undertook the evil project of altering Zapruder's home movie did not have the same mindset concerning the famous "back and to the left" motion of the President's head that almost all other conspiracy theorists have when watching the film.
Maybe Horne and Fetzer (et al) think that the film-fakers really thought that the rear head snap would be a GOOD thing to leave in the altered version of the film.
Or, alternately, maybe Horne and Fetzer believe that the film-alterers simply DIDN'T NOTICE the rear head snap at all, and that's why it wasn't removed from Zapruder's film.
Or, as another alternative (based on Fetzer's theory of the Z-Film being
"wholly fabricated"), perhaps the people who were "wholly fabricating" the film thought it would be a good idea to ADD IN the rear head snap, thereby causing millions of Americans to think that the FABRICATED FROM WHOLE CLOTH film was really revealing the exact thing that the film-fakers were (supposedly) attempting to cover up -- A CONSPIRACY TO MURDER JOHN F. KENNEDY.
Isn't it time for common sense to take center stage in the debate concerning "Zapruder Film fakery"?
David Von Pein
April 5, 2010
Posted By: David Von Pein
MY YouTube CHANNELS:
DVP's JFK CHANNEL
DVP's OLD-TIME RADIO CHANNEL
MY JFK BOOK:
"BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT"
THE ASSASSINATION OF
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY:
A LONE-GUNMAN VIEWPOINT:
DVP's VIDEO & AUDIO ARCHIVE: