GIL JESUS SAID:
The alleged Klein's deposit slip of 3/13/63 (Waldman [Exhibit No.] 10) has a date of 2/15/63 and is not stamped by the First National Bank of Chicago, which it should have been had it been deposited.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The "WRONG DATE ON THE EXTRA COPY OF THE DEPOSIT SLIP" is just one more example (among dozens of others) where the conspiracy theorists SHOULD be asking themselves the following logical question:
WHAT THE HELL WERE THE CONSPIRATORS THINKING WHEN THEY DID SOMETHING THIS STUPID -- LIKE PUTTING A FEBRUARY 15 DATE ON A DEPOSIT TICKET THAT THE PLOTTERS HAD TO HAVE KNOWN FROM THE GET-GO WAS A DEPOSIT THAT NEEDED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE
MARCH 13 KLEIN'S DEPOSIT --- OR LIKE PLANTING A MAUSER RIFLE IN
THE BOOK DEPOSITORY, WHEN THEY CERTAINLY MUST HAVE KNOWN
THAT THEIR PATSY NAMED OSWALD DIDN'T OWN A MAUSER--HE OWNED A MANNLICHER-CARCANO?
Errors such as the one with the incorrect date on this deposit ticket are errors that are MUCH easier to associate with normal fallible human errors than they are associated with any kind of perceived "plot" that has been PRE-arranged by a group of conspirators for the purpose of faking evidence in the JFK murder case.
Why is this so?
Because if that February 15 date was really written there by a person who deliberately was trying to create a fake and false paper trail to Rifle C2766 (and, hence, incriminate a "patsy" named Lee Harvey Oswald), then the plotters would have KNOWN from the start that they would need to be very very careful when placing all of this FORGED EVIDENCE into the record, and they would make doubly certain to cross every T and dot every I in the proper places.
And they would have also known to have placed the proper bank stamps on the documents in question too (or they SHOULD have factored that detail into their "Let's Frame Oswald" ruse, unless all of these plotters, to a man, were brainless morons).
The fact that we have discrepancies like the "February 15" deposit slip existing in the record at all is, in my opinion, much more indicative of NO CONSPIRACY connected with items like that deposit slip than it is with the type of vast "Every Document Is Phony" plot that a lot of conspiracy theorists believe in today.
My last paragraph above is either pretty accurate...or: the alleged patsy-framers screwed up YET AGAIN with a piece of evidence in this case.
I wonder how many stupid, reckless, idiotic errors the conspiracy theorists are willing to allow their patsy-framers before they put on the brakes and realize that such discrepancies WOULD NOT EXIST AT ALL if there really had been a concerted effort by a band of plotters to doctor and manipulate all of the evidence in the JFK case?
Now seems like a good time to repeat one of my favorite passages from Vincent Bugliosi's book "Reclaiming History":
"The conspiracy community regularly seizes on one slip of the tongue, misunderstanding, or slight discrepancy to defeat twenty pieces of solid evidence; .... treats rumors, even questions, as the equivalent of proof; leaps from the most minuscule of discoveries to the grandest of conclusions; and insists that the failure to explain everything perfectly negates all that is explained." -- Vincent T. Bugliosi; Page xliii of "Reclaiming History: The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy" (c.2007)
David Von Pein
March 8, 2011