BEN HOLMES SAID:
If they *had* looked at the back wound, the *first* thing they would have noted is that the back wound was *larger* than the neck wound.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Spoken by a kook named Ben who seems to think that the throat wound was actually MEASURED BY SOMEBODY at Parkland before the trach was performed right through that bullet hole.
Who measured it, Ben?
Answer -- Nobody did.
But, Ben (being the kook he is) seems to think he KNOWS that the hole in John Kennedy's throat was positively smaller than the back wound....even though he can't possibly know that, since the wound in the throat was never measured by anybody, and was observed for a very short period of time by doctors who were busy doing other things as well.
Ben's tactic is known as Kook Logic. And he has applied for a patent on it. It's pending as we speak.
BEN HOLMES SAID:
No examination of the neck wound was permitted at Bethesda.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
More kookshit from a kook named Ben. The throat wound was positively examined by Humes, et al, at the autopsy. But it wasn't KNOWN to be anything but a PROBABLE TRACH INCISION by the Bethesda doctors. Not a bullet hole. But it definitely WAS examined.
Let's listen to James J. Humes regarding this matter that Ben has just misrepresented (as per usual):
DR. HUMES -- "When examining the wounds in the base of the President's neck anteriorly, the region of the tracheotomy performed at Parkland Hospital, we noted and we noted in our record, some contusion and bruising of the muscles of the neck of the President. We noted that at the time of the postmortem examination."
And I want to know what person ordered "NO NECK WOUND EXAMINATION", per Ben's beliefs? Burkley? McHugh? Who?
Ben won't be able to tell me...because he doesn't know. And he's a kook. And as I just showed above, the neck wound was examined at the autopsy.
David Von Pein
March 17, 2007
