ROB CLARK SAID:
With the recent influx of LN's [at this JFK group on Facebook], Steve Roe, Kyle Gizas, David Von Pein, this post hasn't got an answer from any of them...why was the CIA so worried about Garrison's investigation? So much so to kill witnesses, interfere with witnesses, disregard Garrison's subpoenas, infiltrate and steal documents from his office, use the media to discredit him...or did Oswald come back from the grave and orchestrate it all?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Rob, you ACTUALLY believe the CIA killed witnesses?? That's total nonsense.
My guess is that the CIA showed a strong interest in Jim Garrison's worthless case against Clay Shaw because THEY THEMSELVES (the CIA) were being targeted as the murderers of President Kennedy. And such a notion is nonsense and the CIA knew it was nonsense.
If somebody were accusing you of something vile, absurd, and ridiculous, wouldn't you feel the urge to fight back in some way? Who wouldn't?
ROB CLARK SAID:
Um...no...This is America, where if a District Attorney has enough evidence to take a case to trial, it is not okay for the CIA to go on the offensive and kill its assets like David Ferrie. They are not supposed to operate inside the United States. Perry Russo was a rock solid witness in my opinion.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Oh Lord. Rob thinks Perry Russo, an admitted liar, was a "rock solid witness".
Unbelievable.
(No wonder Rob is a Garrison fan. He still supports Russo's lies.)
GRANT PURDY SAID:
I can't believe there are people naive enough to think that the CIA isn't capable of committing such heinous acts.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Did the CIA rub out Bobby Kennedy too? And MLK?
MURRAY GILKESON SAID:
RFK, quite possibly.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Great. Now the CIA is a suspect in RFK's death. And Sirhan was "programmed" to kill him, I suppose.
ROB CLARK SAID:
The CIA employees don't wear uniforms with nametags. They have assets, people they pay to perform duties, be it trusted mafioso or deniable scumbags. Your deflection of the facts into personal attacks to make us sound like know-nothing idiots is strong, but we see through it and your gaslighting techniques here. Might need to head back to Langley for a refresher course in your tactics, David Von Pein.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
And let's not forget about Ruth Paine (CIA vixen) planting Oswald in the Book Depository, right?
CT rule of thumb:
If you don't want to believe the evidence in a political assassination---just pretend everybody was working for the CIA. (Lovely.)
MICK DOHERTY SAID:
"I was in Dallas when we got the sonofabitch and I was in LA when we got the little bastard." -- Direct quote from David Sanchez Morales, Chief Operations Officer for the CIA's JM/WAVE facility.
When someone like Morales makes a statement like that then I think we need to take it seriously.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
I guess Morales used Oswald's rifle then, eh? (Or should I just ignore ALL the physical evidence in the case, as the CTers do?)
GRANT PURDY SAID:
No. Wallace used it, David.
MICK DOHERTY SAID:
Well, you ignore all the evidence that points to conspiracy, so I am sure it wouldn't be too much of a leap for ya.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
There is no evidence of a conspiracy. It's all interpretation. And Malcolm Wallace's print was not found on any TSBD boxes. That's CT myth #2334.
GRANT PURDY SAID:
No evidence of CIA involvement, David?!
So, E. Howard Hunt's confession (career CIA) doesn't provide any evidence?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
No, it sure doesn't. A blowhard who "confesses" (sans any solid proof to back up his inane "confession") doesn't mean much.
Just look at the James Files "confession". How many CTers actually believe that Files fired the fatal head shot into JFK's skull from the Grassy Knoll with a Fireball pistol, with Files then leaving his "calling card" up on the fence in the form of a spent bullet shell with Jimmy's teeth marks in it. (Yeah, real believable story there.)
[CLICK HERE for more of my thoughts about the insane theory pertaining to Jimmy Files.]
And didn't Carlos Marcello confess too?
How many "crying wolf" confessions do we have in this case anyway? It must be at least half-a-dozen or so. Are they ALL to be believed? Including the "Oscar Marino" Cuban story put on the movie screen in 2006 by the German filmmaker? Is that one also true?
Plus, not ONE of the people who have confessed can be tied (in even the slightest way) to the person who really did commit the assassination -- Lee Harvey Oswald. But that fact never seems to slow down the conspiracy theorists, does it?
David Von Pein
January 19, 2014
