JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
JOHN CANAL SAID:
I'd ask DVP to post [a graphic] like that, but he uses Google and can't--so he's got an excuse for not showing how little he knows about the bullet's path through JFK's head, as it relates to the brain and windshield damage.
McAdams, meanwhile, is too smart to post something that would reveal to a three-year-old how stupid the cowlick entry hoax really is.
The bottom line here is...that not one of the three most active cowlick entry theorists [DVP, John Fiorentino, and Professor John McAdams] will post a graphic showing us their proposed bullet track.
Coincidence? Ya, right.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
What difference does it make if any of us posts a "graphic" or not, John?
Whether any of us posts a graphic or not, the entry wound in John Kennedy's head isn't going to suddenly move from the cowlick location to any other location on JFK's head.
And you will still never be able to fight the inconvenient fact that THIRTEEN DIFFERENT PATHOLOGISTS for the Clark Panel and the HSCA came to the SAME "COWLICK" ENTRY conclusion that you hate so much.
It's amazing to think that John Canal thinks he is superior to ALL THIRTEEN of those professional doctors, isn't it?
Just "for the record", let's have another look at what the four doctors for the Clark Panel said about the way the COWLICK entry wound in the scalp PERFECTLY LINES UP with the entry hole in the X-rays:
"There is an elliptical penetrating wound of the scalp situated near the midline and high above the hairline. The position of this wound corresponds to the hole in the skull seen in the lateral X-ray film #2. .... On one of the lateral films [X-rays] of the skull (#2), a hole measuring approximately 8 mm. in diameter on the outer surface of the skull and as much as 20 mm. on the internal surface can be seen in profile approximately 100 mm. above the external occipital protuberance. The bone of the lower edge of the hole is depressed."
Therefore, per Mr. Canal, not only is the famous color BOH photo totally misleading (due to the 3-inch "scalp-stretching" that Mr. Canal has invented for himself), but, incredibly, the autopsy X-ray of JFK's underlying SKULL is misleading too!
And--get this--those two photographic items are, incredibly, misleading in the EXACT SAME WAY -- i.e., the scalp photo is FALSELY showing the entry wound to be located in the cowlick....and the X-ray is FALSELY showing the entry wound to ALSO be in the cowlick area of JFK's head, per John Canal.
As I said -- Incredible. Not to mention impossible.
David Von Pein
May 29, 2009
Posted By: David Von Pein