BEN HOLMES SAID:
David Von Pein says that there's no large wound on the back of JFK's head. That's an answer to my question.
I've repeated[ly] stated that David **HAS** answered my question. But neither Puddy [Bud] nor Chuckles [Chuck Schuyler] will answer, or agree publicly with David.
NO-ONE WILL PUBLICLY AGREE THAT DAVID'S ANSWER IS RIGHT!
Chuckles knows that David answered my question of whether or not there was a large wound on the back of JFK's head.
But Chuckles ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to publicly state he agrees with David... despite being asked a number of times.
Clearly, Chuckles must think that David is wrong, or that David simply lied when giving his answer. Those are the only possibilities.
David - are you going to allow your fellow believers to imply that you're a liar?
CHUCK SCHUYLER SAID:
I publicly agree that DVP's "take" on the BOH wound is correct.
BEN HOLMES SAID:
FINALLY!!! CHUCKLES ACTUALLY ANSWERS THE QUESTION!!! CHUCKLES NOW HAS CLAIMED THAT THERE WAS NO LARGE WOUND ON THE BACK OF JFK'S HEAD.
[...]
Now that you've made a claim, do you intend to support it by citing the evidence for your claim?
Are you going to explain what part of the occipital is *NOT* in the back of the head?
Do you have the courage to tell everyone what the measurements of the large head wound actually was?
Are you ready to show how such a wound can be put on JFK's head - without being in the back of his head?
Are you ready to explain the DOZENS of medical witnesses who dispute what you and David claim?
Are you ready to explain why you don't believe the Autopsy Report?
Or are you, as I FIRMLY predict, going to slink away like the coward you are after making your unsupported claim?
Watch folks, as Chuckles slinks away, unwilling to support his claim.
(I think I'll go buy a lottery ticket... I've been predicting these cowards for so long...)
BUD SAID:
The autopsy stated where the wound was and Ben keeps asking other people about it. This illustrates he is playing silly games.
"BORIS" SAID:
When 25 different doctors all witness the same identical thing, it's fact.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
http://jfk-archives/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1045
http://jfk-archives/index/JFK-Head-Wounds
"BORIS" SAID:
Put your shit website with its 1990s flash and clipped content away, Von Pissant.
Because I can do the same thing. And I can do it better:
http://assassinationweb.com/ag6.htm
http://paulseaton.com/jfk/boh/parkland-wound.htm
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You can't do it at all, Richard Head.
You can't even figure out the super-easy stuff. No Internet CTer can. You're all still struggling even with the Tippit case. And there's never been an easier case to figure out than that one.
But, keep pretending, Richard/"Boris". You're good at that at least.
"BORIS" SAID:
Very good, Von Trapped. Ignore 25 expert witnesses and in response lob a sugar-coated insult not fit for a five-year-old, you lowly mutt.
Is Tippit what is currently being discussed? I must have missed the seamless subject segue. Either that, or you're running from a blatantly obvious anomaly you CLEARLY have no explanation for, and have admitted having none.
This is why your book nets you pennies in annual royalties.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
I must've gotten a raise. Last year = Zip.
"BORIS" SAID:
There's **literally** more evidence of me having said [this] than there is Oswald shot at Walker.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
So Commission Exhibit No. 1 is a fake too, eh Richard?
~yawn~
~stretch~
"BORIS" SAID:
Your talking points are more dated than Betamax tapes. Least of all the entirely non-specific nature of its contents.
Stick to curating your YouTube channel. It's the only thing you're good at.
http://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57701
http://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=961
http://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62287
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
So you do think CE1 is a phony document. Got it.
(Gee, what a surprise that is.)
"BORIS" SAID:
Funny how you think me linking to some OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS equates with me believing CE1 is fake. I wonder why your mind would go there? Hmm...
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Well, since I'm talking to a silly ABO [Anybody But Oswald] Internet conspiracy fantasist, where else could my mind possibly go? You guys have no choice but to think everything pointing to LHO is fake/phony. Otherwise, he's guilty. And that will never do.
You even think Marina was framing her own husband (via all the "lies" you are convinced she told). Now that's wacky.
"BORIS" SAID:
Your mind would go exactly to what you *know* those documents indicate about CE1 but are too chickenshit to admit.
Marina never lied. Ever. Now...show me you have the balls to repeat that.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
What's your theory as to WHY the Dallas Police and FBI felt compelled to frame Oswald---AFTER HE WAS ALREADY DEAD---for a THIRD murder attempt (the Walker shooting)?
What was in it for the Dallas cops and the Feds when they decided to lay another attempted murder charge at Oswald's (dead) feet?
Why weren't TWO murder charges enough for the evil authorities?
"BORIS" SAID:
Every villain needs a backstory. If they wanted to frame Oswald in the first place, they would have used [a] 6.5mm bullet rather than a 30.06 caliber like what was found at Walker's.
It's as if the Walker shooting was thrown in as an afterthought. Likely it had something to do with adhering to Point 2 of the Katzenbach memo, regarding speculation as to Oswald's motive.
Maybe the better question is....is there ANY evidence linking Oswald to the shooting? At all?
A better question still might be...how did Oswald get away with that crime scot-free for nine months [sic], and yet on 11/22 he was caught in under an hour and a half?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Maybe it had a little something to do with the fact that he had to leave the Kennedy murder weapon behind in the Depository building, and the fact that he also killed a police officer in full view of various witnesses just 45 minutes after he shot the President.
Ya think?
"BORIS" SAID:
What I think is you completely ignored the points I raised. Every single one.
And you still can't publicly state that Marina didn't lie during the investigation. And you won't. Because you're a coward, but you're not stupid.
Well, you are. But not THAT stupid.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You lied (of course) when you said a 30.06 bullet was found at the Walker house. It was actually a Carcano bullet (of course).
But you (of course) think CE573 was a "plant" too. ~sigh~
BEN HOLMES SAID:
Those [DVP] websites don't answer any of the questions I raise.
So every time you post a STUPID link like that, I'll simply respond with Douglas Horne's five-volume set.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Brilliant move, Ben. It's akin to being the person who came up with "New Coke" and bragging incessantly about it.
Here's a humorous reminder of how insane Douglas "New Coke" Horne's theories can be....
And that's the guy Ben Holmes is proud to march beside.
Get me a New Coke, Ben. I'm thirsty after all that laughing.
"BORIS" SAID:
I see a well-written post by someone far more researched than you that 13 of 15 people felt added to the discussion.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
We're back to my "New Coke" comparison again, I see. (Thanks for making my point---again.)
What's next....CTers boasting about being a member of the 1962 Mets?
David Von Pein
May 2, 2019
