JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
A CONSPIRACY THEORIST SAID:
[Nick Kendrick stated] that only two people in deely plaza [sic] said they heard gunshots from the grassy knoll.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You'd better learn to read better, because there's no possible chance that Nick ever said that.
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY BUFF THEN SAID:
Why is DVP defending Nick? How could he intimately know exactly what Nick wrote or didn't write? Oh that's right. They are the same person. [LOL.] David Von PEON indeed.
THEN ANOTHER EINSTEIN CHIMED IN WITH:
[It] couldn't be more obvious that the two frauds [Nick & DVP] are one and the same. Scum bags. Remember, according to Von Pein himself, he never takes his travelling circus show into the public domain because he has "a terrible case of stage fright." LOL!!! Chicken-hearted lying cowards.
THEN ANOTHER KOOK SAID:
Dave Von Pein--or whatever the hell his name really is--was actually kicked out of the room [i.e., "The Education Forum"] because he was not able to provide a picture of himself. LOL!!! Of course not -- that's because he's probably [Gary] Mack or [John] McAdams posting under a phoney alias.
FOLLOWED BY THIS QUOTE FROM A CTer WHO APPARENTLY HAS EVERYTHING FIGURED OUT:
Von Pein and this Slick Nick character were kicked off the JFK Lancer forum a few years ago for posting lies and playing little troll games with other posters.
DAVID VON PEIN THEN SAID:
In reality, we were both kicked out of Debra Conway's "JFK Lancer" nuthouse in late July of 2005 due to the fact that Nick had just joined the forum eleven days earlier, and the combination of common-sense-based and evidence-based posts from both Nick and myself became too much for the conspiracy-happy clowns at Lancer to bear. Therefore, we both had to go. And, therefore, on July 28, 2005, we were both banned from posting the actual evidence (and common sense) at the Lancer forum from that point forward.
And since our departure, I don't think there's been one single "LNer" to post on a regular basis at JFK-Lancer.com. Offhand, I can't even think of a single LNer that has posted even ONE post there in the last few years. There probably have been a few lone-assassin believers to post there once in a while; but I can't think of any right now. The place is saturated with nothing but conspiracy-seekers.
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY CLOWN ADDED:
There is really no moderation on this [IMDB] forum, so they can pretty much post all the lies they want freely. Put them on a serious discussion forum, and they fold quickly.
Their "job" is to create so much distraction with bogus arguments that newbies to this subject will either be discouraged from studying further, or will be duped into adopting the official story as their belief. I put the word "job" in quotation marks, as that is what Slick Nick described it as the other day. He said the CTers on this forum make his "job" easy. An admission that he is being paid to do this.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
I see the conspiracy-happy kooks are out in force today. It's just a shame that none of these kooks has any bullets from any non-Oswald gun(s) to show anybody. If a 3-gun, 6-shot assassination took place (as Oliver Stone insists was the case on 11/22/63), you'd think that there would be at least ONE non-Oswald bullet in the evidence pile someplace.
And to think that all of these bullets from non-LHO weapons that were supposedly GOING INTO THE VICTIMS could have been miraculously hidden from everyone's view at Parkland and Bethesda right after the shooting is a belief that only David Copperfield might try to embrace. Because to any non-magician, such sleight-of-hand with the bullets (and the WOUNDS IN THE VICTIMS too!) is just pure fantasy...and always has been.
The conspiracy kooks think they can realistically prop up the kind of "3-shooter" fantasy promoted by Stone and Garrison even though they have ZERO bullets or bullet fragments that can be said to have come from a gun other than Lee Oswald's.
And Garrison went on the Johnny Carson show in 1968 and actually hinted that there might have been as many as FIVE different guns being aimed at JFK in Dealey Plaza (even though, per Mega-Kook Garrison, Lee Harvey Oswald was being "sheepdipped" and framed as the LONE PATSY).
And yet when the dust settled, we have ONLY bullets and fragments that lead to Oswald's gun. But the conspiracy kooks aren't the least bit concerned about little details like that. They apparently think that it's to be EXPECTED to have found definitive proof of ONLY OSWALD'S gun after a shooting which nuts like Garrison and Stone say occurred as a result of multiple gunmen pumping the President full of bullets.
I honestly ask every conspiracy theorist -- Can it GET much sillier than that kind of 3-gun, 1-patsy scenario that is laid out in Oliver Stone's ridiculous movie?
If anyone answers "Yes" to my last question above, they should seek mental help asap. Because the only reasonable answer to my last question is a resounding "No, it cannot".
David Von Pein
May 8, 2009
Posted By: David Von Pein