JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
JOHN CANAL SAID:
>>> "Don't you have any new arguments?" <<<
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Why would I need any new ones? The ones I've been using on your lame theory work just fine. And they always will....because the autopsy X-ray, the autopsy photos, the autopsy report, and the words of the autopsy doctors aren't going anyplace. That stuff's in place forever. Live with it. There's no large-sized BOH wound. Period.
>>> "This one has been debunked already." <<<
You haven't even come close to debunking it, John. You're in a dream world all your own.
>>> "Now where in the Hell did John Canal ever get that crazy idea?.....oh ya, of all places, it was hidden from the likes of DVP, Fiorentino, and McAdams...yup, it was in the autopsy report and in Humes' WC & HSCA testimony." <<<
Nope. Not even close.
There's nothing in the autopsy report or in the testimony of Humes that can possibly bolster the "BOH/LN" theory you've invented, John.
>>> "Brilliant, just brilliant. Not only did Dr. Zimmerman[,] who reads x-rays on a daily basis and has examined the originals[,] say the fractures looked "complete", but the autopsy docs also said they were....but that doesn't stop the doctor wanabe, DVP, from giving us his analysis of the copies of the x-rays." <<<
There's not nearly enough fracturing in the right-rear to make your "BOH/LN" fantasy come true. It's not even close.
>>> "I've already dignified your B/S more than I should have, wake
I'm fully awake. The proof is in the visual aids -- in TRIPLICATE, in fact --
1.) The Zapruder Film (which shows not a HINT of the "BOH" wound that John needs to make his fantasy come true).
2.) The autopsy photos (i.e., BOTH of the pictures that show the back of JFK's head...with neither picture providing anything even CLOSE to the kind of large-sized BOH hole or DAMAGE of ANY kind that would [or could] turn John Canal's fantastic theory into a reality).
3.) The autopsy X-ray of the right side of President Kennedy's head (which doesn't show nearly the type of fragmentation/fracturing of JFK's skull in the occipital [right-rear] part of the head that John requires in order for his dream theory to reach fruition).
Incredibly, John Canal thinks that his fantastic BOH/LN theory is TRUE....even though ALL THREE of the above hunks of photographic evidence (IN TANDEM, mind you!) are proving to John that his theory won't hold even an ounce of H2O.
John, you're amazing.
>>> "Wake up. VB has, on the entry and BOH wounds...ASK HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! " <<<
There isn't a chance in a billion that Vincent Bugliosi will do a complete about-face regarding the head wounds of President Kennedy, thus totally negating gobs of stuff he has already written in his impeccably researched "book for the ages" ("Reclaiming History"). Not a chance.
Because Vince has eyes too. And Vince can see, by merely taking one more good look (in tandem) at the THREE photographic items mentioned above (which include FOUR separate pieces of photo/film evidence, including two different autopsy pictures of the back of JFK's head), that John F. Kennedy did not at ANY TIME on November 22, 1963, have a great-big hole in the rear of his head.
People who have their own unique pet theories regarding various aspects of the events surrounding JFK's assassination are always a bit of a mystery to me. And John Canal, a man who has a lot of things right about the JFK case, is one such person.
But, sadly, Mr. Canal's unique pet BOH/LN theory is something that he's likely to cling to from now until doomsday. Because John has invested too much time and effort and computer keyboard strokes to back away from his impossible pet theory now.
John Canal is very much like the following JFK conspiracy theorists, who each has his or her own "pet theory" to peddle (each one just as silly as Mr. Canal's, of course; many of them much, much sillier):
Thomas "TWO HEAD SHOTS FROM THE REAR" Purvis;
David "JFK'S WOUNDS WERE ALTERED BEFORE THE AUTOPSY" Lifton;
James "THE ZAPRUDER FILM IS A COMPLETE FABRICATION" Fetzer;
Bonar "GEORGE HICKEY KILLED JFK BY ACCIDENT" Menninger;
John "THERE WERE TWO OSWALDS IN THE DEPOSITORY ON NOVEMBER 22" Armstrong;
Jim "OSWALD WAS SET UP IN ADVANCE AS A LONE PATSY EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE 5 GUNMEN FIRING AT JFK IN DEALEY PLAZA" Garrison;
Brian "A FAKE JFK POPPED UP OUT OF A SECRET COMPARTMENT IN THE LIMO" Andersen;
Joan "GARRISON WAS RIGHT AFTER ALL" Mellen;
Donald "DANNY ARCE KILLED JFK" Willis;
Jack "I NEVER MET AN ASSASSINATION-RELATED PICTURE THAT I DIDN'T THINK WAS FAKE" White;
Gary "BADGE MAN" Mack;
...etc., etc. to near infinity.
David Von Pein
March 31, 2009
Posted By: David Von Pein
MY YouTube CHANNELS:
DVP's JFK CHANNEL
DVP's OLD-TIME RADIO CHANNEL
DVP's CHANNEL #3
MY JFK BOOK:
"BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT"
THE ASSASSINATION OF
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY:
A LONE-GUNMAN VIEWPOINT:
DVP's VIDEO & AUDIO ARCHIVE: