"PAPA ANDY" SAID:
In the end, RH ["Reclaiming History"] contributes nothing to the controversy. If people read it...it may damage the LN cause as its slipshod reasoning is exposed.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Only a complete moron would post the above absurdly inaccurate paragraph regarding Vincent Bugliosi's incredibly well-reasoned JFK book.
It doesn't surprise me in the least, though, that a conspiracy theorist isn't satisfied with Vincent's "53 items of evidence".
Most of the CTers here wouldn't be satisfied with 8,853 solid pieces of evidence favoring Oswald's guilt (and probable lone guilt, too, of course, given Oswald's obviously-"solo" actions after 12:30 on 11/22/63).
No amount of hard evidence and regular common sense satisfies conspiracy-loving kooks.
With respect to the Single-Bullet Theory specifically, I truly believe that a rabid conspiracist wouldn't accept the SBT even if the bullet had been captured on film, showing the missile slicing methodically through both John F. Kennedy and John B. Connally.
In such a case, the standard CT-Kook reply would probably be -- "Nah, that SBT Film is fake too!"
David Von Pein
October 18, 2007
