JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
David, the difference between being human and human sewage lies in whether you genuinely believe in your position. And if your belief is that you cannot defend your position but intend to pitch it anyway, then you fall squarely into the latter category.
And when you compound your lie by falsely claiming that you are capable of refuting an argument but will not do so because your adversary is a "kook", then you are not just a liar, but a joke.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Just to set things a little straighter:
Robert Harris thinks he is BETTER at finding the truth concerning the JFK assassination than all of the following official organizations:
The Warren Commission.
The Clark Panel.
The Rockefeller Commission.
The above four official organizations are all pure garbage and are totally worthless and useless, according to a person like Robert Harris. Because:
1.) Robert Harris thinks that a conspiracy existed in JFK's death (and Bob certainly doesn't believe in the HSCA's "4-shot" type of conspiracy, because the HSCA said that Lee Oswald was the only gunman to strike JFK with any bullets in Dealey Plaza).
2.) Robert Harris thinks that David Ferrie and Carlos Marcello were two of the key conspirators behind the assassination (which can never be proved, naturally).
3.) Robert Harris thinks that a frontal shot hit JFK in the head (which is a stance that is dead wrong, and provably so).
4.) Robert Harris thinks he has SOLVED the case.
Therefore, because of the above laundry list of unprovable conspiracy-oriented silliness, it's quite easy to label Mr. Harris a "kook", because he is a person who is forced to totally IGNORE virtually all of the BEST EVIDENCE in the case in order to promote his nonsensical theories and suppositions. And that "best evidence" is, of course: The autopsy report, the three autopsy doctors, and (most importantly) the autopsy photographs and X-rays of the late President Kennedy.
As for Harris' theory about a missed shot occurring at precisely Z285 of the Zapruder Film....
Bob has convinced himself, via totally-subjective analysis, that a gunshot did occur at Z285. And he is happy with that subjective analysis (which can never ever be proven, of course). Well, good for him.
So, Robert Harris sits up on his high horse of conspiracy and crows to anyone who will listen (on YouTube or any available Internet forum) about how he has solved the JFK assassination case, as he implies with glee that David Von Pein is nothing more than "human sewage", a "joke", and a "liar".
I always get a kick out of the CTers who claim mightily and superiorly that they have SOLVED the case, even though they've "solved" the case on nothing more than a whim, a fancy, pure speculation, and a digital copy of the Zapruder Film. Not a lick of hard evidence, of course, enters into Robert Harris' "solving" of the case. How could it, since every single piece of solid evidence, of course, points only to Oswald?
Such conspiracy theorists are the true "jokes" of the "assassination research community". It's just too bad they will never realize that fact.
Vincent Bugliosi said it very well when he said:
"The conspiracy community regularly seizes on one slip of the tongue, misunderstanding, or slight discrepancy to defeat twenty pieces of solid evidence; accepts one witness of theirs, even if he or she is a provable nut, as being far more credible than ten normal witnesses on the other side; treats rumors, even questions, as the equivalent of proof; leaps from the most minuscule of discoveries to the grandest of conclusions; and insists that the failure to explain everything perfectly negates all that is explained."
-- Vince Bugliosi; Page xliii of "Reclaiming History" (c.2007)
This portion of the above Bugliosi quote is always worthy of an instant replay (because of its 100% spot-on accuracy):
"The conspiracy community regularly...leaps from the most minuscule of discoveries to the grandest of conclusions; and insists that the failure to explain everything perfectly negates all that is explained." -- VB
As far as this comment made by Mr. Harris....
"And when you compound your lie by falsely claiming that you are capable of refuting an argument but will not do so because your adversary is a "kook", then you are not just a liar, but a joke."
....Harris knows full well, of course, that he and I have battled several times online in the past (concerning his "Z285" theory and his "Marcello/Ferrie" theory and his "Two Head Shots" theory).
Apparently the one dozen Internet battles linked in this post must have vanished completely from his memory. I guess I'm supposed to refute Bob's arguments anew on every single forum I visit from now until doomsday, otherwise Mr. Harris will continue to pretend we've never fought these battles in the past.
But, you see, this is exactly why I prefer to archive all of my past posts and messages in an easy-to-reach location for future reference, so that I won't have to spend untold hours rewriting a bunch of stuff that I've already written months or years ago.
David Von Pein
November 7, 2009
Posted By: David Von Pein