A CONSPIRACY NUTCASE NAMED WALT SAID:
>>> "Why did you want to drag me into this debate? You know I'll just show you to be a lying ignoramus." <<<
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
This is kind of like a turtle saying to a rabbit: "Why bother racing
me, Mr. Rabbit? You know I'll just end up beating you by a mile."
(Does anybody really know if Walt The Kook ACTUALLY believes he has
defeated ANY LNer on this board [or any other board] with his make-
believe bullcrap? If he does, the word 'delusional' comes to mind
immediately.)
>>> "Brennan said he saw the gunman moving back and forth behind WINDOWS (plural) on the sixth floor." <<<
Lookie! Walt is skewing the evidence again! What a surprise!
Please provide a cite for your above lie, Walt-Kook.
>>> "Brennan was referring to the window where he had seen the LIGHT CLOTHING clad gunman BEFORE the motorcade's arrival. In his afidavit [sic] he DESCRIBED the window where he'd seen the WHITE CLOTHING
clad gunman aiming the rifle AT THE TIME of the shooting. The ONLY window that matches his DESCRIPTION was at the WEST end of the sixth floor." <<<
I'm certainly not going to once again type out the actual evidence
that proves "Walt The Ultra-Mega-Kook" to be dead-wrong (as per
usual). We've been over this multiple times previously...and I've
totally demolished Walt's ridiculous "BRENNAN WAS DESCRIBING
THE WEST-END WINDOW" bullshit several times over.
If anyone wants to see the kook's theory ripped to shreds by the real
evidence and testimony in the case, you can go HERE and HERE.
>>> "Hey Dumbass....The planted evidence was good enough to fool the suckers (as you readily demonstrate, by being a prime example)." <<<
Hey Kook! There's not a person in this asylum who doesn't realize that
you are the evidence-mangling king. You wear the title like it was a badge
of honor.
Go figure somebody actually being PROUD of performing the kind of
evidence-twisting Walt engages in, 24/7.
~shrugs at the thought~
David Von Pein
February 2008
LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (FEBRUARY 26, 2008)
