ROB CAPRIO:
>>> "I guess Davey doesn't understand for a bullet a 1/4 of a mile is no big deal. He also doesn't get it probably was a miss that hit the roof of the building. 8 blocks is NO real big deal and it was a closer miss." <<<
DAVID VON PEIN:
So, let me get this straight -- You think that TWO different non-Oswald
gunmen fired bullets at JFK's car (which was on ELM STREET), and that
one of these two bullets somehow ended up "embedded in the roof of a
building that was about 1/4 of a mile from the TSBD", while the other
bullet ended up "atop the Massey Building...about 8 blocks away from
the TSBD". Correct?
One logical question, therefore, needs to be asked at this point:
WHAT IN THE THE HELL WERE THOSE BLIND-AS-A-BAT GUNMEN AIMING AT?!
They surely weren't aiming their guns at John F. Kennedy if their
bullets ended up on the ROOFS of two different buildings many BLOCKS
from Dealey Plaza. They must have been aiming at some pigeons in the
area.
Or: Maybe those shooters were using rubber ("bouncing") bullets....the
kind that bounce onto rooftops after hitting the area on ELM STREET
where these goofs SHOULD be aiming their weapons.
Plus: The "Lester" bullet leads to another hilarious scenario, one
that would have to include some idiot (and also apparently blind)
rifleman firing a shot at JFK (who is on the STREET below) and somehow
having his spent bullet ending up on the railroad overpass, many feet
HIGHER than Elm Street.
Again, was it a bouncing bullet? Or maybe the gunman was aiming at
S.M. Holland or Austin Miller on the overpass, huh?
Footnote --- I shall be big enough to eat my share of crow with
respect to my previous post on this subject. In looking over that
post, I realized I erred when I asserted that the (supposed) gunmen
who fired those bullets that (supposedly/allegedly) ended up on nearby
rooftops many blocks from the Depository would have been "firing off
guns A QUARTER OF A MILE **AND** EIGHT BLOCKS AWAY from where the
proverbial patsy was located".
I was thinking in terms of only bullet SHELL CASES being (supposedly)
found on those nearby rooftops, not the bullets themselves, which
would mean (if only shell cases were found on the roofs) that the
gunmen themselves would have been firing FROM those rooftops.
But I now realize I goofed in that assertion, because (supposedly)
we're talking about where the actual spent bullets ENDED UP in these
instances, and not the (supposed) shooting location(s) from where they
originated.
But, even though I had the "origin"/"destination" thing mixed up, it's
still quite easy to shoot down the idea that any of these alleged
"other" bullets were actually involved in the assassination on
11/22/63, which I've already done above. Ordinary common sense (and
basic trajectory lines) destroy that idea right off the bat. (Unless
some CTers really DO want to believe that TWO bullets ended up on
ROOFTOPS after the dust had settled in Dealey Plaza. Sounds pretty
loony to me though.)
>>> "They were trying to kill JFK. The people who handled the planting of "evidence" took care of the patsy, LHO, not the shooters." <<<
But I know damn well that you think Oswald was being "set up" in
ADVANCE of 11/22. All rabid "Anybody But Oswald" kooks like you believe
in that scenario, right? This is due to your crazy beliefs that the Backyard
Photos are fakes and that there were imposter Oswalds running around
well prior to November 22, etc.
Therefore, via those kind of pre-11/22 beliefs, it must mean that some
of the "plotters"/"assassins" WERE, indeed, attempting to frame Mr.
Oswald as their lone patsy for the assassination.
Therefore, how much sense does it make to utilize several different
gunmen to kill JFK, firing from opposite directions and with different
types of guns (which could never be traced to the patsy in the TSBD)?
It's just stupid. And suicidal. And totally unnecessary, to boot, if
your killers are professionals, that is, which most of you kooks believe
was the case.
But, per these "other bullet specimens" we've been talking about here,
I guess maybe the kooks will have to retract that business about the
"real assassins" being "professional hit men".
Because, per the locations of those rooftop bullets, it seems to me that
those shooters might as well have stayed home on November 22, 1963.
Because they didn't come within a country mile of hitting John F. Kennedy
with their bullets.
David Von Pein
December 2007
LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (DECEMBER 29, 2007)
