JOHN CANAL SAID:
If one PH [Parkland Hospital] witness said the BOH [Back Of Head] wound was the size of a quarter...
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
What Parkland witness ever said it was the size of a quarter?
And if there is such a "quarter"-sized witness, shouldn't that little
fact signal to you that there's a pretty good-sized discrepancy
between the people who were all in the same Parkland ER looking at the
same head of President Kennedy?
Let me guess----
You think it's okay to have a "size" discrepancy (and a huge "size"
discrepancy at that) amongst the Parkland witnesses who saw JFK's head
wound....but it's not okay to have a "location" discrepancy?
And, yes, even amongst the Parkland witnesses, there IS some discrepancy,
with not every witness placing the wound in the exact same location
(with Dulany, Peters, and Rike, in fact, placing the wound in a
virtually impossible location, seeing as how they could not possibly
have seen that portion of JFK's head in the ER on 11/22/63):
.jpg)
JOHN CANAL SAID:
...because our [Canal's & Bugliosi's] telephone exchanges began because of that misquote and are continuing (and are paying dividends).
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
~chuckle~
So, you're well on your way to convincing Vince Bugliosi of your silly
"BOH/LN" theory, eh John?
If so, then I guess you've also convinced Vince (somehow) to totally
ignore this X-ray too; right, John?:
And you've also convinced Vince (somehow) that the brightly-lit
autopsy photo shown below is totally misleading, with JFK's seemingly
totally undamaged scalp REALLY being quite damaged (per your theory).
And the reason we can't see any stitches or any visible scalp damage
at all is due to some fancy John Canal double-talk. Isn't that right,
John?
BTW, I forgot what your double-talk consisted of when referring to
this picture below, John. Please let me know what double-talk you
served up for Vince Bugliosi to explain away the TOTALLY UNDAMAGED
REAR SCALP of President Kennedy that is seen in this particular
photograph:
David Von Pein
January 5, 2009
