JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 395)


GIL JESUS SAID:

Nearly ALL of the autopsy witnesses interviewed by the HSCA agreed with the Bethesda witnesses [GIL THE SUPER-KOOK PROBABLY MEANT TO SAY "PARKLAND WITNESSES" HERE, UNLESS THE KOOK NOW THINKS THAT THE "AUTOPSY" WITNESSES AND THE "BETHESDA" WITNESSES ARE TWO DIFFERENT GROUPS OF PEOPLE; DUH!] that there was a large gaping wound at the rear of the skull.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Isn't it odd, though, how this X-ray totally destroys each and every witness who incorrectly placed that "large gaping wound" at the back of JFK's head?:



The X-ray must be a fake....right, Gilbert?

Just pretend that all 20+ members of the HSCA's photographic panel were all liars and idiots and WC/LN shills, too, Gil. It's your only recourse--of course. Because that X-ray--all by itself--completely demolishes every theory that has Kennedy's head being blown apart by a Grassy Knoll assassin.


GIL JESUS SAID:

The "official" autopsy photo F8 shows the gaping wound at the rear as well.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

LOL.

The F8 autopsy photo is, of course, essentially worthless as evidence. You might as well introduce an inkblot into evidence instead. It'd be about the same. Can't possibly tell "up" from "down".

Naturally, "Gil The Super Photo Analyst" can decipher F8 for us, though. And, guess what kids?! -- Gil's conclusion leads to "conspiracy"! Gee, what a surprise there!


GIL JESUS SAID:

It's obvious to anyone except those who refuse to see.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

LOL. Stop it, Gil!

My bladder!


DAN RATHER -- "About the head wound....there was only one?"

DR. HUMES -- "There was only one entrance wound in the head; yes, sir."

RATHER -- "And that was where?"

DR. HUMES -- "That was posterior, about two-and-a-half centimeters to the right of the mid-line posteriorly."

RATHER -- "And the exit wound?"

DR. HUMES -- "And the exit wound was a large, irregular wound to the front and right side of the President's head."

RATHER -- "Now can you be absolutely certain that the wound you describe as the entry wound was in FACT that?"

DR. HUMES -- "Yes, indeed, we can. Very precisely and incontrovertibly. The missile traversed the skin and then traversed the bony skull....and as it passed through the skull it produced a characteristic coning or bevelling effect on the inner aspect of the skull. Which is scientific evidence that the wound was made from behind and passed forward through the President's skull."

RATHER -- "This is very important....you say there's scientific evidence....is it conclusive scientific evidence?"

DR. HUMES -- "Yes, sir; it is."

RATHER -- "Is there any doubt that the wound at the back of the President's head was the entry wound?"

DR. HUMES -- "There is absolutely no doubt, sir."


video


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Just call Dr. Humes another one of the many liars in this case, Gil. You, of course, have to do that after reading the above comments by Humes.

David Von Pein
December 14, 2008