JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1009)


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

This is a good documentary that even most conspiracy theorists should be able to appreciate. Lots of air time for conspiracy....

video

To see the entire 93-minute program, GO HERE.


ED CAGE SAID:

This documentary is a series of "What if" and "There's something fishy here" CT jargon. It offers no evidence of any material game-changing flaws with the WCR.

The reason the WCR and the SBT held up for 52 years was that they were correct and supported by the evidence.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I agree, Ed.

However, the '99 "Warren Commission" program is worthwhile because, if for no other reason, it gathers together for on-camera interviews so many different CTers and LNers for the same documentary. I've listed most of them (but not all) in this logo that I created to advertise this documentary on my sites:




TED RUBINSTEIN SAID:

Thanks David.

I saw this for the first time and found it balanced unlike almost all of the MSM coverage on the 50th. This program gave many good reasons to doubt the WC findings.

I can't see how one could watch this objectively and still have confidence in the lone nut conclusion.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I can, Ted. A lot of "CTers" get to have their say in the program, but in the final analysis, those CTers still don't have any solid evidence to back up their suspicions.

The LN (Oswald-Did-It) side has all the bullets and guns and paper sacks and shells and prints.

The CT side has great lip service---but beyond that, not very much. If only the conspiracists had a non-Oswald bullet fragment, or David Ferrie's fake eyebrows left behind in the Sniper's Nest, or....something. Anything! But, they don't.

David Von Pein
August 24-25, 2015