MIKE WILLIAMS SAID:
In order to accept the SBT you have to ignore many reasons why it is incorrect.
Hell, many members of the WC did not even believe it.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
And you can bet your bottom dollar that none of those Warren Commission members (goofball Richard Russell being one of them) examined the Zapruder Film frames in a back-and-forth TOGGLING manner like we can easily do today on our home computers. If they had seen these toggling images over and over again, there wouldn't have been any WC members who disbelieved the obviously true Single-Bullet Theory (except perhaps Goofball Russell):
(2).gif)
MIKE WILLIAMS SAID:
You asked me to explain away all the reactions we see from JBC [John B. Connally], I ask you to prove those are reactions to a bullet, and not simply being startled.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You're living in an anti-SBT dream world, Mike Williams.
You think ALL of that stuff I just illustrated (which is ALL TOTALLY CONSISTENT WITH A BULLET HITTING CONNALLY, with Connally reacting in quick, reflexive, JERKY ways) was caused by JBC merely being "startled" by a shot that Oswald fired back at Z189 (per your theory of when the first shot occurred, which is also wrong, as Governor Connally's "right turn" at approximately Z164 indicates)?
As I said, you're dreaming.
I can't figure out people like Mike Williams and Mark Fuhrman (and, to a lesser extent, "Conspiracy Of One" author Jim Moore, who believes in the SBT, but at a much later time--Z235--which means Moore, too, was willing to totally ignore the early involuntary reactions of Connally). Those type people (Williams, Fuhrman) will endorse the "Oswald Alone" scenario, but they apparently want to be "different" in that they refuse to believe the obviousness of the SBT. A curious mindset amongst some LNers, to be sure.
MIKE WILLIAMS SAID:
I understand [Dr. John K.] Lattimer tried desperately to duplicate the lapel flip, to no avail. How unfortunate for the SBT supporters, because there is evidence in that film of a hit to JBC, and it comes oddly enough almost exactly when he said he was hit.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Good job, Mike. Keep ignoring all of those involuntary Connally reactions at Z224-Z235. Just pretend he was "startled" by the sound of Oswald's first shot....right down to his RIGHT WRIST being "startled" enough to want to rapidly move up then back down in the space of 3 or 4 Z-Film frames beginning at Z226....
Don't you wonder why Governor Connally's RIGHT ARM (the very same arm attached to the wrist that was fractured during the shooting) is moving around like it does at Z226, Mike? Just a coincidence?
MIKE WILLIAMS SAID:
Nietzsche tells us "One who quotes himself is weighed down with egotism more than he is enlightened by wisdom."
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Why should I be modest when it comes to this "SBT" issue (and other issues dealing with garden-variety common sense relating to the assassination of President Kennedy)? Some of my words on this subject are worth repeating (IMO). YMMV. So be it.
But, if you want some quotes from somebody else who knows all about the evidence in the JFK case, I'll give you a couple:
"The single-bullet theory...[is] so obvious that a child could author it."
-- Vincent Bugliosi; Page 302 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History: The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy" (c.2007)
"The "single-bullet THEORY" is an obvious misnomer. Though in its incipient stages it was but a theory, the indisputable evidence is that it is now a proven FACT, a wholly supported conclusion. .... And no sensible mind that is also informed can plausibly make the case that the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the upper right part of his back did not go on to hit Governor Connally." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Pages 489-490 of "Reclaiming History"
MIKE WILLIAMS SAID:
When you can prove to me that JBC is moving because of a gunshot, rather than being startled, then I will consider it.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Excellent job of continuing to ignore the obvious, Mike.
Keep it up. You'll soon be in bed with Mr. Fuhrman. Maybe you can collaborate with Mark on a sequel to his 2006 book. You can call it: "A Simple Act Of SBT Ignorance".
Lots more SBT talk here:
David Von Pein
March 25, 2010
