JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1043)


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

FYI / FWIW / STO [i.e., Stating The Obvious].....

Lousy proofreading and typing skills are most certainly not necessarily an indication of a lack of intelligence or brains or knowledge of the JFK case, because John McAdams' online posts are routinely riddled with typos and missing words. And Mr. McAdams definitely is not lacking in education (or in facts relating to the JFK assassination).

I, myself, am a fusspot when it comes to spelling and grammar and getting names spelled correctly, etc., so it always upsets me (a little) when I go back and read one of my old posts and find any kind of a typo.

So if anybody sees a typo in a post of mine (where edits are allowed), please let me know. Because I hate typos almost as much as I hate hearing about how Lee Oswald never fired a shot at anybody in the calendar year of nineteen sixty-three. :-)


GARRY PUFFER SAID:

I never said such things were an indication of a lack of intelligence. What they indicate is a disdain for the reader and a level of carelessness which also shows up in McAdams' thought process. He can't control himself long enough to suss out the truth of a situation before he's firing his gun wildly.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

No. Like all conspiracy theorists, you're reading way too much into things. (What makes CTers do that all the time?)

John McAdams' frequent typos, IMO, merely indicate that he's in a hurry most of the time and has to moderate hundreds of additional posts before he goes to bed. (With many of those "aaj" newsgroup posts being written by an assortment of crazed "Oswald Is Innocent" conspiracy hobbyists. And that kind of "Conspiracy Overload" could make any sane man blow a gasket while at the keyboard.)


GARRY PUFFER SAID:

That's what got him [John McAdams] fired. He is far too ready to jump to conclusions, which is, as you know, quite ironic. But it partly explains why he's the king of trolls. The other part is, shall we say, a matter of national security.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

What a nice load of nonsense and horse feces that is, Garry.

Do you think that I, too, am part of the national security apparatus (or something equally as nonsensical)?

What about Jean Davison? Is she Government controlled, too?

And Dale Myers?

And Gerald Posner?

And the late Gary Mack and Vincent Bugliosi?

And Jim Moore?

And Hugh Aynesworth?

And Patrick Collins?

And Dale H. Hayes, Jr.?

And Hank Sienzant?

And Bill O'Reilly?

And on and on....?


GARRY PUFFER SAID:

McAdams is a moron.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

I most emphatically disagree, Mr. Puffer.

John McAdams is one the best there is in this "online" world of ours at properly evaluating the evidence in the John F. Kennedy murder case.

Of, course, YMMV. (And obviously does vary---quite a bit.) :-)








"NICKNAME" SAID:

And like all LNers, you don't read enough into things...and strain to drum up a weak explanation in the process.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Nick,

And, therefore, you actually think Garry Puffer's explanation for why John McAdams makes a lot of typos in his Internet posts is a more reasonable explanation than the one I supplied?

Holy Christmas!

David Von Pein
October 3, 2015