JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 201)


PAT SPEER SAID:

>>> "Demonstrating that the previous solution was incorrect is
enough." <<<



DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Which is something that no conspiracy theorist (or group thereof) has
ever done.

Conspiracists THINK they've "demonstrated" that the official version
is wrong, but the unsupportable and forever-unprovable opinions of a
bunch of armchair theorists couldn't possibly matter less, IMO. (And
perhaps major news outlets like ABC and CBS, et al, feel the same
way.)

A brief look at the assassination inventory:

Conspiracy theorists have no non-Oswald guns, they have no bullets
other than those which came from Oswald's guns (or which were
consistent with coming from his guns), they have no bullet shells
other than those that go directly back into the two guns of Oswald's
(including the four Tippit shells), and they have no witnesses who saw
anyone other than Lee Harvey Oswald firing a gun at either JFK or J.D.
Tippit.

When assessing anything of a PHYSICAL nature, about the only thing I
can think of (offhand) that the conspiracy theorists possess in this
"physical" regard (and I'm including "witness observations" in this
definition of things "physical"; aka: Direct Evidence) would be the
several Parkland and Bethesda witnesses who said they saw a large
wound in the back of JFK's head.

But those witnesses (yes, ALL of them) are proven 100% incorrect/
mistaken by taking just a brief glance at the following
"unaltered" [HSCA determination] photograph, which proves beyond all
possible doubt that the "Wound In The Back Of The Head" witnesses
were wrong (no matter how many of those witnesses existed):



How can any conspiracy believer who thinks that JFK was shot in the
head from the front possibly explain away the above X-ray of President
Kennedy's cranium? How?


>>> "As far as your assessment of the TV programs you watch--please!!! If you can't see the bias of these programs then you really need to watch them again." <<<

This isn't always the case at all, IMO. For example, Robert Stone's
2007 PBS-TV documentary, "Oswald's Ghost", allows several pro-
conspiracy people to have their say--lots of "say", in fact--including
one of the "deans" of conspiracy, Mark Lane.

David Von Pein
April 25, 2008


================================


RANDOM PHOTO FROM
THE KENNEDY GALLERY: