JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 73)


CONSPIRACIST WALT SAID:

>>> "The evidence that was intended to point to Oswald was planted. The spent shells were planted in the SN (smoker's nook) without regard to the actual shooting site(s). Who knows why the sixth-floor gunman planted the shells behind the EAST-end window but actually fired from the WEST-end window??" <<<


DAVID V.P. SAID:

Great. Walt KNOWS this happened, but he has no idea WHY the boobs who
he said did it would ever do it? He can only "speculate", as he's going to
say in just a second.

Gotta love it.

And ya gotta love those boobs who were framing Ozzie-Boy. Just toss
some shells down at the OPPOSITE end of the building and hope against
hope that nobody saw the REAL killer at the west end (Arce maybe?; ask
Donald Willis about this; you guys can write a new kookbook).

I love it.


>>> "Perhaps there were two men up there...and one planted the shells behind the east-end window, while the man in the west-end window was totally unaware that the other guy was planting the shells." <<<

Please, Walt...stop!!

My bladder! Remember the weakness of it!!

Next On The Kook Channel....

TWO BOOBS ON THE SIXTH FLOOR WHO HAD NO IDEA WHAT THE OTHER WAS DOING ON NOV. 22, EVEN THOUGH THE HEAD BOOB(S) WERE ATTEMPTING TO FRAME OSWALD *WELL IN ADVANCE OF NOV. 22*!!

Details at 11:00....if we can get the editor to stop laughing and edit the damn film!


>>> "There are several other possible reasons that the shells were planted behind the east window, but I wasn't there at the time, so I can only speculate." <<<

Yes, you do that very well. In fact, that's ALL you do--speculate.

Hilarious.


>>> "However I do know that the gunman that Brennan saw firing a hunting rifle, was firing from the WEST-end window." <<<

Goodie. Walt continues the "hunting rifle" lie. Try finding the word
"hunting" ANYWHERE on the webpages below:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan.htm

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/brennan2.htm

BTW, Walt, has anyone ever proven that the portions of a 5'9" man that
Howard Brennan said he saw in the Sniper's Nest window (on the east
side of the building, of course, not the west end) could actually be seen
from Brennan's 11/22 vantage point WHILE THE PERSON WAS STANDING?

I'm not like Walt The Kook, because I don't EXPECT to have a witness
get every last thing correct with 100% accuracy, right down to the
age, height, weight, and hues of clothing. But Walt seems to expect
this kind of accuracy from casual observers.

I know that Brennan definitely got some things wrong -- like Oswald's
precise age, his precise weight, and there's the differences in the
clothing colors. Plus, I know that Brennan was wrong when he said that
Oswald (and the fifth-floor Negroes) were "standing" in their
respective windows at certain times when Brennan observed them on
November 22nd, when we know for a fact that detail is incorrect,
because we know that Jarman, Norman, and Williams were kneeling and
not standing.

But Brennan was consistent regarding this inaccuracy....from the
Negroes to Oswald on the floor directly above J,N,&W.

But my earlier point is this -- I'm just wondering if any "tests" were
done to show how much of a 5-foot-9 man would indeed be visible from
Brennan's POV when looking through either the half-opened SN window or
(to make Walt happy) through a wide-open window on the west side of
the Depository?

My guess is that the man's face and head (and probably much more too)
would be located above the area of either a half-open or fully-open
window if the person was standing up erect, which would make
identifying any facial features of any such standing man quite
difficult on 11/22/63, seeing as how those windows look fairly dirty
(and there'd be DOUBLE the dirty window panes extending toward the top
portion of the window too). In fact, this photo (CE489) pretty much
proves that fact.

But Brennan, at SOME POINT on November 22, certainly was able to see
Lee Oswald's FACE at least once, in order to make a positive
identification. And this was almost certainly when Oswald was firing
his third and fatal shot from the Sniper's Nest. (Plus, Brennan
probably got a decent look at Oswald's face just after that last shot
was fired, and just before Oswald moved back away from the squatting
position that he was almost certainly in when he fired the rifle at
the President.)


>>> "The TSBD building owner (Dry Hole Byrd) had that WEST-end window removed and stored away as a historical artifact immediately after the assassination, because he knew that it was that WEST-end window from which one of the assassins had fired." <<<

Goodie! More "speculation" from a know-nothing kook!

Gotta love it!


>>> "Since thousands of highly intelligent people have recognized that the W.R. is a lie, I'd say that anybody who believes it is probably suffering from that incurable disease......" <<<

Funny, though, how the HSCA bought the Warren Commission's main
conclusion -- i.e., Oswald fired the only shots that hit any victim in
Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63, isn't it Walt?

Walt, therefore, thinks that ALL MEMBERS of the HSCA were rotten,
stupid shills. Right, kook?

Nice blanket coverage there. Not only was the WC rotten and worthless.
But the follow-up investigators (a totally different batch of many, many
people) were ALSO, per Mr. Kook, somehow either duped into buying
the WC's WRONG conclusions about Oswald or were ALSO the same type
of rotten (stupid) Govt. shills like every member of the WC & Staff was.

Go figure.

Blanket "cover-up" coverage--15 years apart!

Amazing anyone could believe that.

But Walt does. Because he's a moron.

David Von Pein
December 2007

LINK TO ORIGINAL POST (DECEMBER 1, 2007)