WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
Agent [Henry] Sienzant is a liar, disinformant and stooge for the illegitimate national security state.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Reported [to Amazon.com moderators as an inappropriate post].
Message sent to Amazon by DVP:
"Repeatedly calling someone a "liar" is unacceptable behavior that should not be tolerated (especially habitually)."
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
David Von Pein only says that because he is a liar, a disinformant and stooge too.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Reported.
(It shouldn't take too many more abuse reports to get Whitten's despicable hind quarters permanently booted off of Amazon. Hopefully.)
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
Reported.
Von Pein is purposely attempting to force me off of Amazon because we are adversaries.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
LOL. Whitten can't get anything right, can he?
I'm trying to force you off of Amazon because you're disgusting. That's why. Nobody should have to read such tripe and unwarranted insults, post after post. Good riddance.
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
LOL.
So how is it that you, David Von Pein, who rarely post on the Amazon forums, have the right or the duty to attempt to have someone booted from Amazon? I have not merely "called" Agent Sienzant is a liar, disinformant and stooge for the illegitimate national security state. I am doing so for cause, because it is TRUE. He has proven it as well with his spurious rhetoric and prevaricating. He denies proofs that are simply undeniable. He plays word games and twists what others say into knots to serve his nefarious purposes.
You are the same type of operator yourself, Von Pein, and you seeking this great injustice of calling for my banishment from the sidelines is as despicable as any of your disinformant garbage you have spread in your venal career as a stooge.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Whitten,
Point me to just ONE Amazon post authored by DVP wherein I have called another Amazon.com poster a "liar". Just one will do.
You, Whitten, on the other hand, called Hank Sienzant a "liar" in 11 different posts today alone [September 2, 2016] (all on Page 251 of the discussion). And you think that type of behavior is acceptable at a moderated forum?
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
Don't make excuses for your vile behavior, Von Pein. Don't address me personally with your crap. I don't want to have anything to do with you.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The feeling is mutual. Slimy lizards aren't my bag. Bye-bye.
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
You are clearly harassing me, Von Pein. I am requesting that you desist in this childish behavior. Be a 'good boy' and run along now.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Cry me a river, Whitten.
Why do you keep changing your name [in your Amazon.com account], BTW? Are you ashamed of the name William (Willy) Whitten? Or is that a fake name as well?
Just curious.
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
There is a reason for this concerted effort by the stooge patrol, because they are regularly shown to be fools by yours truly. They cannot stand to have effective opposition to their cheesy propaganda.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
When does this "effective opposition" begin, Whitten? Next year perhaps? Next decade? I've seen none from you as of this date.
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
Where is Agent Hanky through all of this, Von Pein? Don't pretend you two didn't coordinate this attack on me.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
I hope Hank is as amused by Whitten's "coordinated attack" paranoia as I am. Fantastic level of paranoia. I love it!
HANK SIENZANT SAID:
lol. Date night — I saw the movie "Don't Breathe" and had dinner with the wife of 34 years.
You think I'm coordinating an 'attack' on you?
It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you, right?
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
Put it in your pantry with your cupcakes.
Just how does Sienzant's proffered alibi of a movie and dinner with his X-wife [sic] preclude a deal [having] Von Pein act as a henchman to attempt getting me banned from these forums?
Does anyone seriously doubt that Agent Sienzant would be delighted to have me out of the way? If the appearance could be made that he had no hand in the commission of the travesty, who could doubt that someone with Sienzant's treacherous MO would take advantage of it?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
CT Paranoia Disease (Round 2).
(I'm lovin' this.)
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
A concerted effort was made by Von Pein last night by a series of 'reports' that followed a series of 'reports' by the disingenuous Agent Sienzant earlier on the other JFK thread here.
So any pretense by the unscrupulous prevaricating Agent Sienzant, that he is not attempting to ban his opponents out of frustration at not having the juice to defeat them fairly on the board, is an obvious falsehood. A falsehood exquisitely exhibited by the stooge himself.
HANK SIENZANT SAID:
And if you get banned, it will be for posts like the above, where you once again call me a "stooge", and the dozen others, where you closed every post with "Agent Sienzant shows he is a disinformant and stooge for the illegitimate national security state" instead of simply discussing the case.
PS: It looks like you got nervous enough to go back and edit that out of those posts.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Yep, Whitten sure did get nervous last night. He was busy editing out most of the "liar" comments. But he missed at least two. We'll see if he slithers back to those posts to edit the ones he missed.
SWITCHING TO THE TOPIC OF "9/11"....
R. ANDERSON SAID:
There is a bit of a difference between me expressing my opinion (based on a career of experience) on 9/11 (which is what I assume you are talking about here)....and you claiming a key witness in the Tippit shooting was lying about something based on a source you refuse to name.
At least one of those differences are (among several): you will not produce this person(s)....and any doubts you have about my expertise....I've told you where we can settle them (i.e. Eng-Tips.com)....and that offer is on the table anytime you want it.
WILLY WHITTEN SAID:
I have challenged you [R. Anderson] to explain how the WTC [World Trade Center] was destroyed by simple office fires time and again here on this site. You REFUSE.
R. ANDERSON SAID:
Which is (of course) a lie. Click Here.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
I wonder how 9/11 conspiracy clowns try to explain away the raw ATC and NORAD audio, in which the hijackings of Flight 11, Flight 175, Flight 77, and Flight 93 are verified via real-time audio, along with the loss of radio contact with those planes and the subsequent disappearance of all four of those jetliners off of all Air Traffic Control radar screens?
I guess the conspiracy clowns must think the FAA and NORAD "faked" these real-time 9/11 tapes. LOL. ....
R. ANDERSON SAID:
No question on that.
And it all was concealed without a hitch. (Standby for Willy to say otherwise.)
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Mr. Anderson,
I don't go to any 9/11 forums or sites (except for my own, which I've created for archiving 9/11 video and audio), so I don't know what kind of idiocy the 9/11 CTers are gushing forth on those forums....
But can I assume that some of the JFK CTers on this Amazon board also think that no Boeing 767s and Boeing 757s hit the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?
Am I correct in that assumption?
R. ANDERSON SAID:
Yep, you got it. They were remote controlled cruise missiles to be precise. According to them, you can see the laser beam (of the guidance system) on the WTC just prior to impact. Of course, when you look at it, it's probably the biggest laser ever. (As big as a flood light. I think the Death Star used something similar.)
It's just further proof that these people will believe just about anything: faked phone calls (from people supposedly impersonating the airline passengers), controlled demo of the towers, remote controlled cruise missiles, etc.
You have to wonder: do they really believe all that stuff or are they just pulling our chain?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The fact that so many JFK conspiracy clowns are also 9/11 conspiracy clowns is a pleasant thing for LNers like myself to contemplate and evaluate (at least on a visceral level).
I.E.,
The fact that the same group of conspiracy clowns can be SO WRONG about something that is SO OBVIOUS (based on all kinds of different provable evidence)---the fact that three airplanes struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on 9/11---lends some credence to the basic notion that they can also be so obviously wrong about another alleged "conspiracy"---the JFK assassination.
And if we then add in the O.J. Simpson murder case.....well, I rest my case.
David Von Pein
September 2-3, 2016 [This forum link is no longer available.]
