ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
The erased characters [on CE842] are the problem.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Robert, you can't prove any initials were "erased" on Commission Exhibit 842. You just want to believe that.
And even if something was erased, you can't prove that such action was conspiratorial in nature. Can you, Bob?
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
The chain of possession was deliberately altered.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
There is absolutely no evidence that there was any SECOND envelope containing a whole bullet from Governor Connally's leg. That's your overactive imagination at work again, Bob.
There is ample proof from Dr. Charles Gregory's testimony that no bullet was found inside Governor Connally's leg (or anywhere else in his body). If any bullet had fallen out and was picked up by a nurse, Gregory would certainly have known about it. Don't you think, Bob?
Bottom Line ---
There is ONE envelope (marked "bullet fragments") that was filled out by Audrey Bell. And that ONE envelope has not only Bell's own handwriting all over it, it also has Bobby Nolan's initials on it. Those two things are on the SAME ENVELOPE. And there's no evidence that Bell filled out a SECOND foreign body envelope.
Don't those two things (occurring in tandem on the same envelope)--Bell's handwriting and Nolan's initials--mean anything significant to you, Robert Harris? If not, why not?
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
We also know for a fact that one of the two bullets the FBI flew in from Parkland evaporated. To make that work, the initials of that nurse HAD to be gotten rid of.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The things that conspiracy kooks "know for a fact" are meaningless. Because, as we all know, conspiracy theorists get almost nothing right when it comes to the JFK case. Most of them (who post on the Internet anyway) can't even figure out that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and Tippit.
There positively was no second whole bullet flown to Washington from Parkland, because no such bullet existed in the first place, and no CTer can prove it ever did exist.
The discrepancy in the time log for when the FBI's Robert Frazier received Bullet CE399 was undoubtedly a simple bookkeeping error. Nothing more.
If it HAD been anything more than a simple, common bookkeeping error, then WHY ON EARTH WOULDN'T THE EVIL FBI HAVE ERADICATED THAT NOTATION IN THE LOG ABOUT A SECOND BULLET BEING RECEIVED BY FRAZIER?
Please explain the logic of your bumbling plotters (the FBI), Bob? They can cover up all kinds of stuff and eliminate all types of evidence, but they can't erase a "7:30" notation on a piece of paper?
Hoover's boys must have all attended "The Barney Fife And Goober Pyle School For Cover-Up Agents".
David Von Pein
May 19, 2010
