DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/Was All Of This Evidence Planted?
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
There was plenty of evidence against Oswald. They [the Dallas Police Department] didn't need to frame him.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Exactly, Bob. That was kinda my point when I said this:
"Did the Dallas Police Department normally have a habit of officially charging suspects with TWO murders if they had no solid evidence against that suspect at all?" -- DVP; September 2014
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
Nothing was planted, David. There was no need to frame Oswald.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Again --- that's exactly correct.
(If you keep thinking this way, Bob, you'll be an LNer before you know it.)
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
The need was to make sure the world didn't know about his accomplices.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You were doing great before you made that last statement.
Re: the Katzenbach memo....Click Here.
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
That evidence [the three bullet shells found in the Sniper's Nest] is worthless unless you can prove they were fired that day.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
There were bullet fragments from THAT SAME GUN found in the President's car! Plus, the Carcano rifle was found on the same floor as the three empty shell casings. You don't think those little tidbits of information provide ample indication as to the DAY when those bullet shells were left in the Sniper's Nest?
How much more proof do you need, Bob? Do you think that bullet fragments from Oswald's gun somehow managed to get into the front seat area of President Kennedy's limousine at some point in time PRIOR to 12:30 PM CST on November 22, 1963? (That would be one wild theory that I doubt even most Internet conspiracy theorists would dare to put forth.)
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
Tell me David, have you ever in your life seen a single piece of evidence which supports the notion that Oswald acted alone?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Every single piece of evidence goes in the direction of Oswald acting alone, Bob. All of it. You know that. You just won't admit it. And all other conspiracy theorists who are aware of the evidence know it too. But they won't admit it either. And that's because they like the idea that unknown/unseen plotters were also involved in JFK's murder, despite the total lack of proof in that regard.
Put all of those "pieces" of evidence together, Bob. What does it add up to? That's the simple arithmetic that no conspiracy theorist ever seems to want to perform.
And please tell me how the TOTALITY of physical evidence in this case (which all points to Lee Harvey Oswald's guilt—and no one else's guilt!) somehow proves—or even remotely suggests—that "accomplices" were involved with Oswald in the assassination?
REPLAY....
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
There were bullet fragments from THAT SAME GUN found in the President's car!
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
We don't [know] for sure about that, David. Any evidence from the FBI [should] be taken with a large grain of salt.
OTOH, they might have come from Oswald's rifle.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The mentality exhibited above by Robert Harris concerning most of the evidence in this case is one of the main reasons why conspiracy theorists think it's okay to declare Lee Harvey Oswald innocent.
I.E.:
The conspiracy believers will simply state "We don't know for sure about that", even though the evidence is quite clear and ironclad that the two large bullet fragments recovered by the Secret Service from the front seat of President Kennedy's limousine positively came out of the barrel of one specific gun --- Mannlicher-Carcano rifle No. C2766, a gun that was owned and possessed in 1963 by a man named Lee Harvey Oswald.
And Oswald's ownership of the Carcano is, of course, yet another rock-solid fact that conspiracists continually want to turn into a mystery (as if it hadn't already been established several decades ago).
David Von Pein
November 6-12, 2016
