ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
Wow!! Unsupported Assertions 'R Us, eh David?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Pot? We need a bigger kettle for Robert "Z285" Harris. He thinks I have engaged in "unsupported assertions" here. But let's take another look at the DVP quote that Bob Harris was responding to when he said I was a member of "Unsupported Assertions 'R Us":
"[James] Braden certainly wasn't a gunman who fired shots at JFK, because there's absolutely no evidence of that, and there's also no evidence whatsoever that any shots originated from the Dal-Tex Building." -- DVP; May 11, 2010
Now, Bob, just exactly what portion of that above DVP quote is "unsupported"?
The answer: None of it.
Don't you love it when a conspiracy theorist with a personal pet theory to peddle says that SOMEBODY ELSE is engaging in "unsupportable assertions"?
Holy hilarity.
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
How did you confirm that no such evidence exists?? And how did you confirm that Braden was not a shooter? Please be specific.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Bob Harris, of course, knows the answer to both of those inquiries already. But, like the true-blue conspiracist he is, he'll force me to beat that dead horse one additional time.
How do I know that no evidence exists of a Dal-Tex shooter?
Well, uh, let me think.....maybe because there's NO EVIDENCE of a Dal-Tex shooter in the National Archives (or anywhere else)?
That's pretty good--for starters. Isn't it Bob?
And can I confirm that James Braden wasn't a shooter?
Well, here's a pretty good place to start to confirm that fact (let's see if Robert Harris can add these images together properly):
+--+Number+Of+Shots.jpg)
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
And do you really believe that JFK first reacted just after the limo pulled in front of the west face of the Daltex building, purely by coincidence?? Or do you prefer to pretend that didn't happen, like you pretend that there were no reactions following 285?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
~sigh~
I can see that pot is colliding head-on with kettle yet again. (Don't you ever tire of that kind of embarrassing clash, Bob?)
Mr. Harris sure possesses some Kong-sized 'nads, I've gotta give him credit for that at least. For a person who fantasizes night and day about a make-believe gunshot a Zapruder Film frame #285, it takes a really large set of family jewels to write these words in a public forum:
"Or do you prefer to pretend that didn't happen, like you pretend that there were no reactions following 285?"
If you look in the dictionary under "irony", you'll likely find a reference to Bob Harris.
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
Once you start evading the facts and evidence David, you're in very big trouble.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Good heavens! Holy mackerel! And for Pete's sake! It looks like Bob truly doesn't care how many times he embarrasses himself via irony in one single post. Remarkable.
DAVID VON PEIN ALSO SAID:
If [David] Ferrie was involved in the assassination, why would he want to travel TO Texas from New Orleans on the night of the assassination? Being a pilot himself, Ferrie would have flown himself out of the country days earlier if he had been part of any plot.
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
What a preposterous argument. There is nothing Ferrie could have done that was more self incriminating than to leave the country.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
~chuckle~
So, Ferrie thought it would be a much better idea to make a pleasure trip TO THE STATE WHERE THE MURDER TOOK PLACE within hours of the MURDER HE CONSPIRED TO COMMIT.
Is that about the size of the situation, Robert?
~another chuckle~
ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
Let's talk about those issues that you've been dodging for so long, David. What are you afraid of?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The only thing I'm concerned about dodging right now is my cat (he's on the stairs right now, and I'm afraid I'm going to trip over him as I sprint for the bathroom, due to my weak bladder getting ready to explode after having read Bob Harris' last post).
Excuse me....
David Von Pein
May 11, 2010
May 12, 2010
