JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Since you think John Connally wasn't touched by a bullet until Z237, I look forward to your explaining away all of the various visual signs of Connally being hit with a bullet between frames Z224 and Z235 (e.g., right shoulder driven forward and downward between Z223 and Z224.....JBC's open-mouth grimace (which begins at Z225; his mouth is closed at Z224).....the "lapel bulge/flip".....the very fast "shoulder hunching" that Connally engages in just after Z225....and THE BIGGIE: the "hat flip" of Connally's RIGHT arm beginning at precisely Z226, i.e., the exact arm that's attached to the wrist that was hit by a bullet, which is a bullet that Mike Williams says didn't strike JBC until ELEVEN FRAMES LATER.
A reasonable person who examines frames 223 through 235 of the Zapruder Film cannot possibly come to any conclusion other than the following one:
JOHN CONNALLY HAS BEEN STRUCK BY A BULLET PRIOR TO Z-FRAME 235.
Former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman came out with a book on the JFK assassination in May 2006 ("A Simple Act Of Murder"), and he tries to pull off the same kind of thing that Mike Williams is postulating -- i.e., Lee Harvey Oswald fired all the shots (three) from the Depository's sixth floor, but the SBT is wrong.
And I used the same reasoning when attacking Mr. Fuhrman's theory (which is really just pure speculation on Fuhrman's part, and nothing more; Fuhrman has absolutely no hard evidence to back up any of his anti-SBT beliefs). And, furthermore, Fuhrman is forced to literally completely IGNORE a whole bunch of SOLID evidence that works in favor of the Single-Bullet Theory being true, as I point out in detail in the book review linked below:
In short -- In order to argue against the validity of the Single-Bullet Theory, a person has no choice but to IGNORE the many, many things that indicate the SBT is correct.
David Von Pein
March 24, 2010
Posted By: David Von Pein