HERBERT BLENNER SAID:
Would [you] mind explaining how reaming an elliptical hole changes the direction of its longer axis?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Beats me. You're apparently the "axis" authority. I really couldn't
care less about this trivial "axis" shit.
Instead, I'll rely on some good ol' CS&L [Common Sense & Logic]:
1.) A bullet went into JFK's upper back...
2.) That bullet struck nothing that could have possibly stopped its
forward progress...
3.) JFK had a bullet hole in his lower throat...
4.) JFK had no bullets or bullet fragments in his body (not counting
his head)...
Solution: The same bullet that struck him in the upper back exited his
lower throat.
And a bunch of double-talk about the "axis" of the wounds, etc., is
never going to change the above-mentioned facts, Herbert.
Now, tell me again how one bullet couldn't have gone through John
Kennedy's body. I love watching a CTer deny the obvious.
HERBERT BLENNER SAID:
If you believe that Humes stuck [his] chubby little finger into a bullet hole
with a 4 mm diameter, then I have a bridge with your name on the bill of sale.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
So, you think Humes didn't stick his "chubby little finger" into the
back wound at all then? Is that what you're saying?
Or would you like to pretend that the bullet hole seen in the picture
below was really a completely different size and/or configuration from
what is exhibited in this photograph (a picture that was determined by
the HSCA to be "unaltered in any manner")?
David Von Pein
November 1, 2008
