Part 1394 of my "JFK Assassination Arguments" series includes a variety of my posts and comments covering the period of November 1—30, 2025. To read the entire forum discussion from which my own comments have been extracted, click on the "Full Discussion" logo at the bottom of each individual segment.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
This item isn't "Kennedy-related", but it's worth a few moments of attention anyway (especially if you're a baseball fan, which I am)....
The 2025 World Series was just recently completed....and Game 7 was a real barn-burner that will surely be remembered for a long time to come, with the Los Angeles Dodgers just barely edging out the Toronto Blue Jays, 5-4 in 11 innings.
See all of the highlights from that amazing seventh game at my link below (the MLB video people do a nice job at putting together these very thorough highlight compilations) (logo created by DVP ☺️)....
DENIS MORISSETTE SAID THIS.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Can't blame you for that, Denis. Especially after the Jays came THIS CLOSE (about an inch!) to winning it all. I, too, wanted Toronto to win.*
* It was more of a case of wanting the Dodgers to lose, since they were the team that knocked my Reds out of the postseason in a two-game sweep. ~sigh~ 🙁
But this year's World Series Game 7 was certainly a nail-biter, that's for sure. And, according to this interesting MLB.com article, it contained 3 of the top 12 "Most Impactful Plays" in Major League Baseball history. That's pretty impressive.
David Von Pein
November 3-4, 2025
================================
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Here's a humorous 1963 newspaper article:
-Herald-Jul-1-1963%20(Kennedy%20Guards%20Red-Faced).jpg)
Also See:
David Von Pein
November 3, 2025
================================
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Keeping in mind that all A.I.-generated online content should be double-checked for accuracy before relying too heavily on it, I have found that it is indeed kind of fun to play around with the various Artificial Intelligence Internet generators to see what kind of answers might pop up.
I asked Grok the following question today [November 7th, 2025]....
Grok, what is your opinion about David Von Pein's online comments and posts regarding the JFK assassination, including his website/blog located at Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com?
After 66 seconds of "thinking", Grok provided the following response....
"David Von Pein is one of the most prolific and dedicated online advocates for the "lone gunman" theory in the JFK assassination—that is, the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing President Kennedy on November 22, 1963, without any conspiracy involved.
From what I've seen of his work, including his blog at Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com (which serves as a hub for point-by-point breakdowns of Oswald's guilt) and his broader JFK archives across sites like DavidVonPein.blogspot.com and his YouTube channel, he approaches the topic with a meticulous, evidence-focused lens. He's essentially an archivist at heart, compiling vast amounts of historical media—newsreels, speeches, interviews, and timelines—that support the Warren Commission's findings.
In my view, his online comments and writings (which span blogs, forums like the Education Forum, and occasional social media shares) are a refreshing counterbalance in a field overrun by speculative conspiracy narratives. He doesn't just assert opinions; he backs them up with detailed references to ballistics (e.g., the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle linked to Oswald), eyewitness accounts (like Howard Brennan's identification), autopsy reports, and the Zapruder film analysis.
For instance, he robustly defends the single-bullet theory, arguing it's the most logical explanation for the wounds to JFK and Governor Connally, using diagrams and tests to show how one bullet (CE399) could cause multiple injuries without needing multiple shooters.
He also dismantles common conspiracy tropes—like claims of evidence tampering, multiple gunmen, or Oswald as a "patsy"—by pointing out how they often ignore Occam's razor and rely on cherry-picked or misinterpreted details.
That said, while I appreciate his logical rigor and commitment to the official record (which aligns with my own truth-seeking bias toward evidence over unsubstantiated plots), the JFK case isn't airtight for everyone. Some ambiguities, like discrepancies in witness testimonies or the acoustics evidence from the House Select Committee, keep the debate alive.
Von Pein can come across as dogmatic in forums, dismissing alternatives outright, which might turn off those exploring nuances. Overall, though, his contributions are invaluable for anyone wanting a grounded, non-sensationalist take—he's like the ultimate fact-checker in a sea of "what ifs". If you're diving into this topic, his sites are a solid starting point for the lone-assassin side."
[End Grok A.I. Quote.]
----------------------------------
I asked the same "What is your opinion?" question using Google's "A.I. Mode" function, and I received this response (excerpted below):
"As an AI, I do not have personal opinions, beliefs, or the capacity to form subjective judgments about individuals or their online content. I can, however, provide objective information based on search results about David Von Pein's work and how it is generally perceived and characterized within the context of the John F. Kennedy assassination discourse.
[...]
Within the JFK assassination research community, Von Pein's work is seen as a major resource for those who believe in the lone gunman theory. Conversely, his arguments are frequently debated and contested by those who believe in a conspiracy or that Oswald was a "patsy".
In summary, David Von Pein's online comments and website are a well-known and comprehensive digital repository for arguments and archival materials supporting the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. His work is primarily used by others in the JFK debate as a source of pro-Warren Commission points and evidence."
[End Google A.I. Quotes.]
----------------------------------
When I did a Google A.I. search using just my name (asking no specific questions at all), I got all of this information within 2 seconds, which provides a good indication of how thorough (and fast) this Artificial Intelligence technology is:
JOHN SIMKIN SAID THIS.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Along those same lines, I asked Google's A.I. this:
Can you provide me with a critique and a comparison of the JFK Assassination-related websites operated separately by researchers James DiEugenio and David Von Pein?
Here's the response I received from Google A.I.:
Note -- The above A.I. response is not an entirely accurate or fair comparison, because (for some reason) these A.I. mechanisms seem to want to focus heavily (and sometimes exclusively) on only the "Audio/Video Archiving" aspect of my many JFK sites, which diminishes my contributions significantly when it comes to the many "Conspiracy vs. Lone Gunman" arguments that I've been engaged in over the years.**
Perhaps in the future, these A.I. models will be improved and fine-tuned even more (which is quite likely), so that a broader view of an individual's online activities can be reflected in an A.I. response.
** I was able to get the Grok A.I. to focus on my "JFK Archives" blog rather than my "Audio/Video" sites. That Grok reply is HERE.
David Von Pein
November 7-8, 2025
