BEN HOLMES SAID:
David Von Pein Hides Behind His Website....
David Von Pein is rightfully terrified of debate with knowledgeable critics, and has—in recent years—remained far away from real debate... preferring instead to cite his website.
That his website is filled with lies and unsupportable claims doesn't bother him... it shields him from looking stupid.
But only to people who are unaware of the other side of the argument.
BEN HOLMES ALSO SAID:
This "extra copy" doesn't demonstrate that anything at all was deposited...
I can create a "deposit slip" showing that I deposited 15.7 million dollars to my bank account.
And it would mean just as much as the exhibit that the Warren Commission accepted as evidence.
Tell us David, if I show you a unstamped deposit slip with a 15.7 million dollar deposit to my account, will you accept a 15 million dollar check to purchase your home?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The "extra copy" might not have even been sent to the bank by Klein's.
Alternatively, if the extra copy of the deposit slip did get sent to the bank by Klein's, how do you know there isn't a bank stamp on the back side of that deposit ticket? Can you prove there's not a bank stamp there?
BEN HOLMES SAID:
You're just a failure, David Von Pein... and perhaps that's why you're afraid to debate in an open forum with critics more knowledgeable than yourself.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Ben's a liar, lurkers. He knows the above statement is a lie, because he knows that I've debated various "critics" in "open forums" hundreds of times in the past. He knows this because I've debated him in "open forums" dozens of times in the past.
Ben is a chronic liar. (Surprise!)
BEN HOLMES SAID:
Sorry moron, I wasn't discussing the past. I stated "YOU'RE AFRAID TO DEBATE IN AN OPEN FORUM WITH CRITICS MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE THAN YOURSELF."
And that's a true statement.
I said nothing about the past. You've been schooled repeatedly in the past. (Hmm... perhaps I'll start reposting some of those, since you refuse to debate now.)
You illustrate it again in this post by running from EVERYTHING I stated.
Certainly you've been spanked and schooled in the past. But you've learned your lesson, and are now TERRIFIED of open debate.
You're *PROVING* that statement true RIGHT NOW!
And in addition to proving yourself a coward, you'll show your dishonesty by failing to post **THIS** post - as is - in your websites.
You can't... you've been outed as a liar and coward in this post.
The only one lying right now is you. Why is that, David?
If you're unwilling to defend it in open forum - why do you cite?
You just want to tell lies, and not pay the price?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
So, unless I respond to your cockeyed crap EVERY SINGLE TIME you desire a response, I'm a coward, eh? Is that the way it works in your silly little mind, Holmes?
I've "debated" virtually every JFK sub-topic with you (or other CTers) in the past, all of which are archived on my website. (Hint: That's the whole idea of putting them on one website---to "archive" past discussions, so that I don't have to repeat myself over and over again a million times. Why is such a concept so foreign to you, Ben Holmes?)
IN THIS 2011 ARTICLE, DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The fact that we have discrepancies like the "February 15" deposit slip existing in the record at all is, in my opinion, much more indicative of NO CONSPIRACY connected with items like that deposit slip than it is with the type of vast "Every Document Is Phony" plot that a lot of conspiracy theorists believe in today.
My last paragraph above is either pretty accurate...or: the alleged patsy-framers screwed up YET AGAIN with a piece of evidence in this case.
I wonder how many stupid, reckless, idiotic errors the conspiracy theorists are willing to allow their patsy-framers before they put on the brakes and realize that such discrepancies WOULD NOT EXIST AT ALL if there really had been a concerted effort by a band of plotters to doctor and manipulate all of the evidence in the JFK case?
BEN HOLMES SAID:
March 13 ... February 15...
Yeah, common mistake... anyone could make a mistake like that...
NOT!
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Ben's either lying (again), or he could just be misinformed about the dates. Ben's date comparison above should read like this....
March 15 ... February 15...
The "March 13" date doesn't apply when talking about the error on the extra copy of the Klein's deposit ticket, as I explain here.
Ben Holmes' year-round attempts to exonerate a double-killer named Oswald are always amusing. But, I guess it makes him happy and content to pretend that LHO didn't shoot anybody on November 22, 1963. I guess everybody needs a hobby.
DAVID HEALY SAID:
LMFAO! Can you prove LHO was in that window at 1230PM 11/22/63? What a bullshit artist!
"BORIS" SAID:
Jesse Curry couldn't.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
"BORIS" SAID:
Keep denying Curry ever said they couldn't place Oswald in that window with the rifle, pond waste.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Keep pretending that Curry was relying on ABSOLUTELY NOTHING (evidence-wise) when he said this about Lee Harvey Oswald on November 23, 1963, Mr. Conspiracy Fantasist....
"I THINK THIS IS THE MAN THAT KILLED THE PRESIDENT." -- Jesse E. Curry; 11/23/63
David Von Pein
April 16-17, 2019
