DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
60-PART JFK SERIES IS BEING RE-RELEASED THROUGH DVP HOME ENTERTAINMENT, KOOK BATTLERS, INC., AND THE CS&L FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA......
"DEBATING THE JFK CASE: THE COMPLETE SERIES"
All sixty common-sense-filled volumes have now been electronically packaged in one space-saving Mega-Set (below).
This series touches on virtually all of the various assassination sub-topics -- from the SBT...to the WC...to the HSCA...to the TSBD...to the BOH...to "I'm just a patsy"...to Badge Man...to Umbrella Man...to the Tippit murder...to Oswald's many lies...to Dr. Humes...to Wesley Frazier...to the "Anybody But Oswald" conspiracy theorists...and, of course, to Vincent "Reclaiming History" Bugliosi.....
All of that "LN vs. CT" wrangling and squabbling, and lots more, can be found (somewhere) within this 60-volume Super-Set!
So sit back, select a volume of your choice, and watch with joy as you observe one conspiracy theory after another crumble into dust via "DEBATING THE JFK CASE: THE COMPLETE SERIES BOXED SET"! .....
CHRIS SAID:
I have to applaud all the work that must have gone into those volumes. .... [But] if the full volume set is like the 'part 78' of arguments, I wouldn't want to go through a complete set while constantly finding bad arguments. It interrupts my reading.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Well, Chris, I guess you won't ever have a desire to read any of Vincent Bugliosi's book then -- because Vince uses the exact same argument that I have utilized to explain the "BOH" Parkland witnesses. Here's what Vince said in his 2007 book:
"Dr. Michael Baden has what I believe to be the answer, one whose logic is solid. [Quoting Baden] "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said. They were wrong," [Baden] told me. "That's why we have autopsies, photographs, and X-rays to determine things like this. Since the thick growth of hair on Kennedy's head hadn't been shaved at Parkland, there's no way for the doctors to have seen the margins of the wound in the skin of the scalp. All they saw was blood and brain tissue adhering to the hair. And that may have been mostly in the occipital area because he was lying on his back and gravity would push his hair, blood, and brain tissue backward, so many of them probably assumed the exit wound was in the back of the head. But clearly, from the autopsy X-rays and photographs and the observations of the autopsy surgeons, the exit wound and defect was not in the occipital area. There was no defect or wound to the rear of Kennedy's head other than the entrance wound in the upper right part of his head." [End Baden quote]." -- Pages 407-408 of "Reclaiming History" by Vincent T. Bugliosi
-------------
Therefore, Chris now is forced to say that both Vincent Bugliosi and Michael Baden have come up with "bad arguments" when it comes to trying to explain why the Parkland personnel said they saw something that we know they could have never seen on 11/22/63 (i.e., a great-big hole in the occipital portion of John F. Kennedy's cranium).
BTW, Chris, when focusing on the Parkland witnesses, you might want to try and evaluate the unbelievable and ridiculous comments made by the doctor who had the best view of JFK's head among all the people who saw the President at Parkland Hospital -- Dr. Robert McClellend.
I've recently posted some of my thoughts about McClelland's 11/22/63 observations, including the excerpt below:
"[Dr.] McClelland has obviously never even once thought about how silly and impossible his theory is. Because if he ever stopped to think about it for any length of time at all, he could never even begin to believe that a bullet could have created a massive blown-out exit wound in the occipital area of a human skull and yet leave the scalp in that same occipital area totally free of any injury. And yet that is EXACTLY what Dr. McClelland said he believes happened."
-- David Von Pein; December 31, 2011
More on McClelland's goofiness here and here.
David Von Pein
January 25, 2012
