JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
PAUL DANZIG SAID:
Did Gerald Ford alter the Warren Commisson report about the shot that hit the president in the back?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
The conspiracy theorists who continually harp on the "change" made by Gerald Ford are always forced to ignore CE903, which proves for all time that the Warren Commission [Ford included] did not require a bullet to enter JFK's "neck" in order to support the Single-Bullet Theory.
CE903 shows the entry wound on the stand-in to be in the UPPER BACK, just exactly where the autopsy photo shows the wound to be on the real body of President Kennedy.
And nothing Gerald Ford said will alter the SBT perfection that exists in
GARY CRAIG SAID:
Is this before or after Ford moved the back wound?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Gary Craig just doesn't seem to catch the drift of my earlier post. (Do conspiracy theorists take multiple thick pills every day?)
Here's my 4-point "drift" (yet again):
1.) As everyone can plainly see, Arlen Specter's pointer/rod in Commission Exhibit No. 903 is pointing to the UPPER BACK (not the "neck") for the entry wound. If Specter had placed his pointer up into the "neck" of the JFK stand-in, the SBT trajectory would be ruined:
2.) As can also be seen quite clearly and plainly, Specter's "entry wound" location as seen in CE903 perfectly matches the location of JFK's real upper-back wound, as seen in this autopsy photograph [keeping in mind THIS built-in margin-of-error]:
3.) Hence, it's fairly obvious that the Warren Commission DID NOT require the entry wound in JFK's upper torso to be situated up in the "NECK" of the President in order for the Single-Bullet Theory trajectory to be accurate and viable.
4.) Therefore, conspiracy theorists who continue to insist that Gerald Ford "moved" President Kennedy's upper-back wound up into the "neck" in order to make the SBT plausible are simply misinformed and are just flat-out wrong. And CE903 proves that those conspiracists are wrong...for all eternity.
Let me now quote a fellow "LNer" (and a fabulous researcher):
"To my knowledge, [nobody] has ever explained how moving the back wound up to THE NECK supports the SBT. Nobody CAN support it, because moving the entry to the neck would destroy the WC's SBT trajectory, not strengthen it. Again I'll refer you to CE 903. Although Specter didn't drill a hole in the stand-in's body and drive the rod through it, had he done so, the entry would be in the upper back, not in the neck. There's a string on the wall above his hand that shows an angle of about 18 degrees -- that's the approximate angle measured by a surveyor during the re-enactment and the one the WC used for its SBT. If the rod is moved up to the neck, the bullet will exit well above the exit wound under JFK's Adam's apple. Or take a look at this photo of JFK:
"Try drawing a line of c. 18 degrees backward from the knot in JFK's tie. Where does it come out? Upper back, right? The claim that Ford's change "strengthens" the WC's SBT is simply not true. If I haven't made my point by now, I give up." -- Jean Davison; January 2, 2007
Jean Davison is a woman I respect tremendously. She is the author of the outstanding 1983 book about Lee Harvey Oswald, entitled "Oswald's Game".
David Von Pein
January 22-23, 2010
Posted By: David Von Pein
MY YouTube CHANNELS:
DVP's JFK CHANNEL
DVP's OLD-TIME RADIO CHANNEL
MY JFK BOOK:
"BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT"
THE ASSASSINATION OF
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY:
A LONE-GUNMAN VIEWPOINT:
DVP's VIDEO & AUDIO ARCHIVE: