JOHN BLUBAUGH SAID:
I have listened to this all very closely and it is clear to me that Rossley backed up just about everything he said with evidence and quoted page and verse of his references.
McAdams seems to have done the debate off the top of his head with nothing to back up his statements. The debate about parafin [sic] tests is a good example. I do not think McAdams was ready for someone as well prepared as Rossley was.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Oh, brother. Those blinders are very thick today, aren't they?
Let's take just a quick (off-the-top-of-my-head) inventory of some of Tom Rossley's debate points:
Rossley magically turned EVERY single verified ENTRY wound into an EXIT wound, and every verified EXIT wound into an ENTRY wound (by waving his hand and saying it was so)....and yet you think that Rossley "backed up just about everything he said with evidence"??
And Rossley performed this "wound magic" with respect to BOTH victims too -- including CONNALLY! Rossley actually said he thinks that Connally's huge, gaping chest wound was a wound of ENTRANCE!
And yet certain people actually think that Rossley won that radio debate, even though he spouted unbelievable fairy-tale beliefs like THAT?!
Come on! You must be dreaming!
Plus:
Rossley thinks it was Oswald in the doorway.
Rossley thinks all the autopsy photos are fakes.
Rossley thinks the backyard photos are fakes.
Rossley thinks numerous people lied like cheap rugs (for decades on end).
Rossley thinks Jack Ruby was "FORCED" to kill Lee Oswald BECAUSE OF SOMETHING THAT DAN RATHER SUPPOSEDLY SAID!
And yet ROSSLEY won that debate, huh?
(There must be a full moon this evening.)
David Von Pein
April 12, 2009
