JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1395)


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Part 1395 of my "JFK Assassination Arguments" series includes a variety of my posts and comments covering the period of December 1—31, 2025. To read the entire forum discussion from which my own comments have been extracted, click on the "Full Discussion" logo at the bottom of each individual segment.


================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Let's take a look back at John F. Kennedy's 91st day as President of the United States --- Thursday, April 20, 1961 --- which was three days after the failed Bay Of Pigs invasion of Cuba:








CLICK TO ENLARGE:



ALL OF JFK'S DAYS AS PRESIDENT:


David Von Pein
December 6, 2025





================================


KEVIN BALCH SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

After approx. 2:00 PM CST on 11/22/63, I'm not sure if the KLIF Radio recording you embedded above is continuous and uninterrupted or not. I've never tried to reconstruct the timing of the KLIF coverage beyond 2 PM.

I did, however, do some pre-2:00 PM reconstruction of the KLIF timeline several years back when the question of "What radio station was Johnny Brewer listening to on Nov. 22?" was raised during this discussion at The Education Forum in April 2019, at which time I posted the information reprinted below....

--------------------

"After re-examining my KLIF-Radio file, I've now discovered that there are 7 minutes of missing audio footage in the first 2-and-a-half hours of my 3-hour and 17-minute copy of KLIF's 11/22/63 assassination coverage. From the timestamps provided by the on-air reporters, I've been able to determine that the missing seven minutes occur between precisely 1:37 PM and 1:44 PM (CST). This, therefore, leaves open the possibility that a bulletin concerning the Tippit shooting could have been broadcast by KLIF during the AWOL seven-minute period. However, if such a bulletin was broadcast during that time period, it would likely have been at a time when Johnny Brewer wasn't even inside his Hardy's Shoe Store to hear the bulletin on his transistor radio, because Brewer by that time had probably already left his store and followed Oswald up the street to the Texas Theater. But we must always keep in mind the fact that nobody was looking at a stopwatch or a clock when these events were unfolding on Jefferson Boulevard in Oak Cliff on November 22nd, so the word "approximately" must always be inserted into discussions like this one when we're talking about "timelines", etc." -- DVP; 4/19/2019

David Von Pein
December 10, 2025





================================


KEVIN BALCH SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

And just why would Oswald have wanted to hitch a ride for just a few blocks and then get out of the car and start walking again in the middle of 10th Street? Or did the person who allegedly gave LHO a lift suddenly run out of gas on Tenth St., forcing Oswald to start walking again? Makes no sense to me.

David Von Pein
December 22, 2025





================================










JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1394)


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Part 1394 of my "JFK Assassination Arguments" series includes a variety of my posts and comments covering the period of November 1—30, 2025. To read the entire forum discussion from which my own comments have been extracted, click on the "Full Discussion" logo at the bottom of each individual segment.


================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

This item isn't "Kennedy-related", but it's worth a few moments of attention anyway (especially if you're a baseball fan, which I am)....

The 2025 World Series was just recently completed....and Game 7 was a real barn-burner that will surely be remembered for a long time to come, with the Los Angeles Dodgers just barely edging out the Toronto Blue Jays, 5-4 in 11 innings.

See all of the highlights from that amazing seventh game at my link below (the MLB video people do a nice job at putting together these very thorough highlight compilations) (logo created by DVP ☺️)....




DENIS MORISSETTE SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Can't blame you for that, Denis. Especially after the Jays came THIS CLOSE (about an inch!) to winning it all. I, too, wanted Toronto to win.*

* It was more of a case of wanting the Dodgers to lose, since they were the team that knocked my Reds out of the postseason in a two-game sweep. ~sigh~ 🙁



But this year's World Series Game 7 was certainly a nail-biter, that's for sure. And, according to this interesting MLB.com article, it contained 3 of the top 12 "Most Impactful Plays" in Major League Baseball history. That's pretty impressive.

David Von Pein
November 3-4, 2025





================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Here's a humorous 1963 newspaper article:




Also See:



David Von Pein
November 3, 2025





================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Keeping in mind that all A.I.-generated online content should be double-checked for accuracy before relying too heavily on it, I have found that it is indeed kind of fun to play around with the various Artificial Intelligence Internet generators to see what kind of answers might pop up.

I asked Grok the following question today [November 7th, 2025]....


Grok, what is your opinion about David Von Pein's online comments and posts regarding the JFK assassination, including his website/blog located at Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com?


After 66 seconds of "thinking", Grok provided the following response....


"David Von Pein is one of the most prolific and dedicated online advocates for the "lone gunman" theory in the JFK assassination—that is, the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing President Kennedy on November 22, 1963, without any conspiracy involved.

From what I've seen of his work, including his blog at Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com (which serves as a hub for point-by-point breakdowns of Oswald's guilt) and his broader JFK archives across sites like DavidVonPein.blogspot.com and his YouTube channel, he approaches the topic with a meticulous, evidence-focused lens. He's essentially an archivist at heart, compiling vast amounts of historical media—newsreels, speeches, interviews, and timelines—that support the Warren Commission's findings.

In my view, his online comments and writings (which span blogs, forums like the Education Forum, and occasional social media shares) are a refreshing counterbalance in a field overrun by speculative conspiracy narratives. He doesn't just assert opinions; he backs them up with detailed references to ballistics (e.g., the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle linked to Oswald), eyewitness accounts (like Howard Brennan's identification), autopsy reports, and the Zapruder film analysis.

For instance, he robustly defends the single-bullet theory, arguing it's the most logical explanation for the wounds to JFK and Governor Connally, using diagrams and tests to show how one bullet (CE399) could cause multiple injuries without needing multiple shooters.

He also dismantles common conspiracy tropes—like claims of evidence tampering, multiple gunmen, or Oswald as a "patsy"—by pointing out how they often ignore Occam's razor and rely on cherry-picked or misinterpreted details.

That said, while I appreciate his logical rigor and commitment to the official record (which aligns with my own truth-seeking bias toward evidence over unsubstantiated plots), the JFK case isn't airtight for everyone. Some ambiguities, like discrepancies in witness testimonies or the acoustics evidence from the House Select Committee, keep the debate alive.

Von Pein can come across as dogmatic in forums, dismissing alternatives outright, which might turn off those exploring nuances. Overall, though, his contributions are invaluable for anyone wanting a grounded, non-sensationalist take—he's like the ultimate fact-checker in a sea of "what ifs". If you're diving into this topic, his sites are a solid starting point for the lone-assassin side."


[End Grok A.I. Quote.]

----------------------------------

I asked the same "What is your opinion?" question using Google's "A.I. Mode" function, and I received this response (excerpted below):


"As an AI, I do not have personal opinions, beliefs, or the capacity to form subjective judgments about individuals or their online content. I can, however, provide objective information based on search results about David Von Pein's work and how it is generally perceived and characterized within the context of the John F. Kennedy assassination discourse.

[...]

Within the JFK assassination research community, Von Pein's work is seen as a major resource for those who believe in the lone gunman theory. Conversely, his arguments are frequently debated and contested by those who believe in a conspiracy or that Oswald was a "patsy".

In summary, David Von Pein's online comments and website are a well-known and comprehensive digital repository for arguments and archival materials supporting the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. His work is primarily used by others in the JFK debate as a source of pro-Warren Commission points and evidence."


[End Google A.I. Quotes.]

----------------------------------

When I did a Google A.I. search using just my name (asking no specific questions at all), I got all of this information within 2 seconds, which provides a good indication of how thorough (and fast) this Artificial Intelligence technology is:





JOHN SIMKIN SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Along those same lines, I asked Google's A.I. this:

Can you provide me with a critique and a comparison of the JFK Assassination-related websites operated separately by researchers James DiEugenio and David Von Pein?

Here's the response I received from Google A.I.:



Note -- The above A.I. response is not an entirely accurate or fair comparison, because (for some reason) these A.I. mechanisms seem to want to focus heavily (and sometimes exclusively) on only the "Audio/Video Archiving" aspect of my many JFK sites, which diminishes my contributions significantly when it comes to the many "Conspiracy vs. Lone Gunman" arguments that I've been engaged in over the years.**

Perhaps in the future, these A.I. models will be improved and fine-tuned even more (which is quite likely), so that a broader view of an individual's online activities can be reflected in an A.I. response.

** I was able to get the Grok A.I. to focus on my "JFK Archives" blog rather than my "Audio/Video" sites. That Grok reply is HERE.

David Von Pein
November 7-8, 2025





================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

As usual, an assortment of crackpots, loons, and nutcases were among those in attendance for the annual November 22nd gathering at Dallas' Dealey Plaza, the site of President Kennedy's assassination.

Veteran JFK assassination researcher and author Fred Litwin was right there in the Plaza for the 2025 version of the spectacle, and Fred reports on the "travesty" in his blog post HERE, which includes a video with the "Real JFK Jr." (who was nice enough to pop up in Dealey Plaza after 26 years in hiding).

Click to enlarge the photo below (which, of course, really belongs on Comedy Central instead of Elm Street):



David Von Pein
November 29, 2025





================================










JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1393)


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Part 1393 of my "JFK Assassination Arguments" series includes a variety of my posts and comments covering the period of October 1—31, 2025. To read the entire forum discussion from which my own comments have been extracted, click on the "Full Discussion" logo at the bottom of each individual segment.


================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Here are some recent NBC Radio Network additions to my audio/video collection:









David Von Pein
October 2, 2025





================================


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Below is a half-hour video of rare TV news footage that I found at TexasArchive.org. These film clips come from Houston television
station KPRC-TV and cover President Kennedy's visit to Houston, Texas,
on November 21, 1963:



David Von Pein
October 2, 2025





================================


GREG DOUDNA SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

If Lee Harvey Oswald was really the "Prayer Man" figure we see in Mr. Darnell's film, then somebody is going to have to explain to me (in a logical and believable fashion) the reason for why Oswald didn't shout "I WAS OUTSIDE ON THE FRONT STEPS!" when he had multiple opportunities to do just that when the TV cameras were being shoved in his face at City Hall on both Nov. 22 and 23. To date, no such logical and believable explanation has come to my attention.

Plus, if we're to believe that Mr. Oswald is "Prayer Man", not only does Lee not say a single word to the live television cameras about being located on the TSBD front stoop when JFK was getting shot, he also decides to LIE to the press (and to the world) by telling the TV audience that he was INSIDE the Depository building at the time of the assassination.

Crazy stuff there indeed.

I would think that these things regarding Lee Oswald's whereabouts at precisely 12:30 PM on 11/22/63 would be very difficult to reconcile and to explain in a logical manner if you're a believer in the "Prayer Man Is Oswald" theory.



David Von Pein
October 4, 2025





================================


LANCE PAYETTE SAID:

"The power went out in the TSBD" factoid....




ROYELL STORING SAID:

How about finding out if the clock atop the TSBD ran on DC current for starters? Let's accumulate FACTS.


RICHARD SMITH SAID:

There are numerous sources to confirm that the power was on in the building in the immediate aftermath of the assassination.

Fact: the clock [atop the TSBD Building] is functioning moments after the assassination per the photograph that clearly shows it displaying 12:30 as the motorcade passes under the overpass.

Fact: the freight elevator is functioning when Baker and Truly take it minutes after the assassination.

Fact: the lights are on in the TSBD moments after the assassination per the interior film footage.

Fact: the freight elevator is functioning when Mooney takes it from the 1st to 2nd floor several minutes after the assassination.

Fact: the freight elevator that Mooney was on did not operate like a normal elevator. It would not work unless he knew how to operate it. His testimony does not disprove that he did not know how to operate it because he would not know what he did not know.

Now spin us a yarn and explain how and why the power was being turned on and off in a way that aligns with these facts. If you are just claiming the alleged power outage was random and had nothing to do with a conspiracy, then who cares?


LANCE PAYETTE SAID:

The Sixth Floor Museum, which owns the remnants of the Hertz sign, doesn't know how it was powered but assumes it was wired into the building's electrical supply: https://www.jfk.org/collections-archive/hertz-sign/.

At the time, the TSBD Hertz sign was one of only three such signs in existence.

Signs of that sort during that era typically did not have backup power.

Obviously, the clock would have to reset or be reset somehow after a power outage.

Whatever you think the significance of this issue is—I see none, but whatever—you will never have a definitive answer.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Thanks, Lance, for reminding me that the Sixth Floor Museum website includes THIS PAGE all about the Hertz sign atop the Book Depository Building.

For those interested, here are a couple of pictures showing the other two large billboard signs that occupied space on the roof of the TSBD prior to 1959. Click to enlarge....

The "U.S. Royal Tires" sign (this photo is from 1948):




The "Ford: Built In Texas" sign, which went up in June 1953:




Click the logo below for many more Dealey Plaza/TSBD images, dating back to the 1930s:



David Von Pein
October 9, 2025





================================


FRED LITWIN SAID:

On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 25 with Dale K. Myers [linked below]

It was a real pleasure talking with Dale Myers about the Tippit shooting and JFK assassination conspiracy theories. Dale also presented a neat computer recreation of the Tippit shooting....




DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Thanks, Fred. Your October 2025 interview with Dale Myers is simply outstanding. It's brimming over with facts and informative tidbits of information about the Tippit shooting. Just terrific. I'm sure I'll be revisiting it several times in the future. (I've added it to my own Dale Myers webpage as well.)

http://dvp-potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/06/dale-myers.html

BTW, yesterday (October 15th) was Dale Myers' 70th birthday. So, Happy Birthday to Dale!

BTW #2 -- Here's a link to Dale's Wikipedia page (which I didn't even know existed until just a few minutes ago):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dale_K._Myers


JOHN MYTTON SAID THIS.


TOMMY SHANKS SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

If only more conspiracy fantasists would wake up to this basic, immutable fact....




GERRY DOWN SAID:

Topic: Dale Myers' Controversial Diagram....

Recently, Dale Myers appeared on an episode of Fred Litwin's podcast [linked above]. In the podcast, Myers goes through a series of computer diagrams showing how he believes LHO was walking from east to west along 10th Street before he shot Tippit. The Warren Commission believed LHO was walking from west to east (i.e., had passed in front of Helen Markham) before shooting Tippit.

Myers' diagrams appear to build a reasonable case that the Tippit shooter had been walking east to west before shooting Tippit. That's because several people did see this mystery person walking east to west along the sidewalk. Therefore, his existence is not in doubt.

However, one of his diagrams I feel is the Achilles Heel in his whole east-to-west theory.

The diagram below shows the mystery man walking east to west along the sidewalk. The two people standing in front of the house across the street are Jimmy Burt and Bill Smith. Bill Smith never saw the mystery man walking along the sidewalk (perhaps because he had his back to the street), but Jimmy Burt did see him.



The issue arises with the pickup truck parked at the intersection between 10th Street and Denver. Two individuals were sitting in the truck having a morning snack. Jim Archer was in the driver's seat and Jimmy Brewer was sitting beside him. Because Brewer was blocking Archer's view of the east, Archer never saw the man walking from the east. Brewer, however, did see him and said that the mystery man did not pass in front of their pickup truck but went behind it. At least that’s what Archer said Brewer said. We don’t know what Brewer himself said as there is apparently no account of what Brewer himself said.



Myers says, and I’m guessing he is quoting an interview of Archer in this regard (he footnotes a 1998 interview of Archer in his book “With Malice”, that Brewer said that the man walking from east to west went behind their pickup truck and then continued walking west along 10th Street towards the Tippit murder scene. The problem though with this is that this is what Archer said Brewer said. This is hearsay.

For example, Brewer could possibly have said:

"I saw a man walking from the east and he walked around the back of our truck. I guess he could have been the one that then killed Tippit."

Archer may have then misinterpreted this to mean that Brewer was saying he saw the man walk behind the truck and actually saw him then continue walking towards the eventual Tippit murder scene. This is the problem with hearsay. The reality is that Brewer may well have lost sight of the mystery man after he walked behind the back of the pickup truck and was just guessing that the mystery man then continued walking towards the eventual Tippit murder scene.

Therefore, there is a fundamental problem with Myers' theory that this person is the Tippit killer. While there was obviously a man walking on the sidewalk on the east side of the 10th and Denver intersection (as seen by both Burt and Brewer), the last definite sighting we have of this man is of him walking behind the pickup truck that Archer and Brewer were sitting in.

This leaves the very real possibility that the reason the man walked behind the pickup truck was because he was walking south on Denver Street, not continuing on 10th Street in the direction of the Tippit murder scene. To the best of my knowledge, the witnesses who saw this man did not describe his clothes, so we can't compare his clothes to any of the eyewitnesses at 10th and Patton who witnessed the person who shot Tippit.

This is where Myers' controversial diagram comes in.

Archer and Brewer are sitting in a parked pickup truck at the intersection of 10th and Denver. Myers appears to have arbitrarily pushed the pickup truck very far out into the intersection in such a way as to block the sidewalk. This would force any walker to then either go around the front or back of the pickup truck if they intended to continue walking along 10th Street.

The problem, though, is that I would posit that Myers has no basis for putting the pickup truck in that unusual position where it is blocking the sidewalk. It’s not as though there were other vehicles parked behind him that forced him to park so far out into the intersection (Myers has not drawn any vehicles behind the pickup truck). And no one would want to park in such a position, as there would be the chance that walkers would scrape off the vehicle as they walked either in front of or to the back of the pickup truck. The more natural position to park would be the way Scoggins parked his car at 10th and Patton as in the diagram below.



It's my theory, and I’ll admit I’m not as well read up about the Tippit murder as Dale Myers or Bill Brown, but I suspect that Archer's pickup truck was more likely parked in a similar position to the way Scoggins parked his car (which is well back from the intersection). And that Brewer saw the mystery man walk behind the pickup truck not because the mystery man intended to continue walking west along 10th Street, but because he was intending to walk south on Denver Street.

In other words, the last sighting we likely have of the mystery man has him walking behind Archer's pickup truck, and as Archer's pickup truck is likely parked more back from the intersection (than is dipicted in Myers' diagram), this would put him on a likely trajectory of walking south on Denver, not continuing on to the Tippit murder scene.

As a final point, the Warren Commission may have figured this issue out back in 1964. The reason I say this is that it would have been to the WC's advantage if Oswald had been walking from east to west as Myers theorizes before he killed Tippit, rather than walking from west to east as they published in their final report.

The west to east trajectory the WC used created the probem that LHO was heading in the general direction of Jack Ruby's apartment. A problem they had to address in the final report. Myers' east to west trajectory, however, would have removed the problem of Jack Ruby's apartment.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Thanks, Gerry Down, for sharing your observations and opinions with us. It's certainly food for thought.

When trying to answer this question — Was Lee Harvey Oswald Walking East Or West On Tenth Street Before He Shot Officer Tippit? — author Vincent Bugliosi HAD THIS TO SAY in his 2007 book "Reclaiming History".



Also....

Here's another useful image, which is a March 1964 aerial photograph showing the area surrounding the Tippit murder site:



David Von Pein
October 16, 2025
October 29, 2025




AND....




================================


BILL SIMPICH SAID THIS.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Hi Bill,

As you alluded to in your opening post, that same quote from Captain Pat Gannaway also appeared in the Evening edition of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on Thursday (Thanksgiving Day), November 28, 1963, Pages 1 & 7 of Section 3.

The Star-Telegram cites reporters M.W. Newman and Henry Hanson of the Chicago Daily News Service as the source for the Gannaway quote. The complete article can be seen below (click to enlarge these two newspaper pages)....






------------------

Related Link:



David Von Pein
October 28, 2025





================================