JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 1340)


A CONSPIRACY THEORIST SAID:

How do you explain that the DPD/FBI found no oil or instruments to clean a rifle at either Oak Cliff or Irving?


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

It proves nothing. That's nothing more than another one of the many, many very weak "chaff" arguments that have been dredged up by conspiracy theorists since 1963.

There's no rule in the "Assassin's Guidebook" that demands Oswald have oil or cleaning implements at his home(s) to use on his weapons.

The much BETTER evidence is: We know Lee Harvey Oswald owned and possessed both the Smith & Wesson .38 revolver and Mannlicher-Carcano rifle #C2766 in 1963. That's an undeniable fact...with or without a few cleaning supplies at the ready.

Plus: Why do CTers think that EVERY last question MUST be officially answered with ironclad certainty in order to arrive at a reasonable conclusion with respect to virtually every aspect of this murder case?

Can you think of ANY other case in history where the jury at a murder trial had to have EVERY SINGLE LAST QUESTION MARK associated with the whole case totally eradicated in order to arrive at a "Guilty Beyond Reasonable Doubt" verdict?

If the ultra-demanding criteria that conspiracy theorists insist be met by Lone Assassin believers regarding every last question in the JFK and J.D. Tippit murder cases were ever to be applied to a "regular" (non-"sensational") murder case anywhere else in the world, all prisons would be empty....because no killer could ever be convicted when utilizing the ridiculous "ALL QUESTION MARKS MUST BE COMPLETELY ELIMINATED" rules that are often imposed by JFK conspiracy theorists.

David Von Pein
September 25, 2007